Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06YEREVAN1524
2006-10-31 04:07:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Yerevan
Cable title:  

PROSECUTOR-GENERAL'S TIP-MISCONDUCT INVESTIGATION

Tags:  PGOV PREL KTIP KWMN KCRM HSTC AM 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4653
RR RUEHDBU
DE RUEHYE #1524/01 3040407
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 310407Z OCT 06
FM AMEMBASSY YEREVAN
TO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE
RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA 1139
RUEHAD/AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI 0044
RUEHDE/AMCONSUL DUBAI 0054
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 YEREVAN 001524 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR G/TIP, DRL AND EUR/CARC

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/30/2016
TAGS: PGOV PREL KTIP KWMN KCRM HSTC AM
SUBJECT: PROSECUTOR-GENERAL'S TIP-MISCONDUCT INVESTIGATION
DISAPPOINTS

REF: A) YEREVAN 1091 B) YEREVAN 1161 C) YEREVAN 484

YEREVAN 00001524 001.2 OF 002


Classified By: CDA A. F. Godfrey for reasons
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 YEREVAN 001524

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR G/TIP, DRL AND EUR/CARC

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/30/2016
TAGS: PGOV PREL KTIP KWMN KCRM HSTC AM
SUBJECT: PROSECUTOR-GENERAL'S TIP-MISCONDUCT INVESTIGATION
DISAPPOINTS

REF: A) YEREVAN 1091 B) YEREVAN 1161 C) YEREVAN 484

YEREVAN 00001524 001.2 OF 002


Classified By: CDA A. F. Godfrey for reasons 1. 4 (b, d).

--------------
SUMMARY
--------------


1. (C) An internal probe of allegations of misconduct with
human traffickers by two investigators in the Prosecutor
General's (PG) Office is apparently over, and the
investigators reportedly cleared of all charges. No results
have been released publicly. Sources within the PG's Office
and some NGO members of a special PG task force called the
probe a farce. This result is discouraging, but unsurprising
given the PG's attitude during an August 8 meeting with the
Ambassador, DCM and Poloff (ref A). We have scheduled a
series of meetings with GOAM officials to pursue the TIP
issue, and will report the results septel. END SUMMARY.

--------------
INTERNAL INVESTIGATION TASK FORCES
--------------


2. (C) The PG launched the internal investigation in late
August as a direct result of our meeting with him (ref A).
We presented allegations by three alleged trafficking victims
that, among other things, two investigators in the PG's
Office had pressured them to change their testimonies, and
that an investigator slapped one of them during questioning.


3. (C) The PG created two task forces to review the
allegations: an internal probe and a commission of outside
NGO representatives. The internal commission included the
head of the PG's Office's Anti-Corruption Department and the
PG's senior aide, who had also been involved in the earlier,
cursory investigation into allegations against Yeremyan. Two
investigators were the subject of the internal probe:
Aristakes Yeremyan, who had been the subject of a February
internal investigation into similar allegations (ref C),and
Armen Gasparyan.


4. (C) Two NGO leaders also sat on the internal commission as
observers: Julieta Amirkhanyan, the president of "Femida"
NGO, who admitted to us that she had no experience in

anti-TIP work, and Edik Baghdasaryan from the Association of
Investigative Journalists. The PG also had attempted to
involve Yenok Shatvoryan of Hope and Help, the NGO that first
brought the alleged victims' charges to our attention.
Shatvoryan told us he declined because he felt his proper
role in the original investigation (the case of the three
alleged TIP victims the investigators were accused of
pressuring) was that of a witness, not a watchdog.
Shatvoryan told us that he was never questioned by the
commission's investigators. Another NGO leader who had
originally been involved in the commission told us she had
quit because she felt it was a conflict of interest to work
both with trafficking victims and with law enforcement.
(COMMENT: Amirkhanyan is a personal friend of the PG,
Baghdasaryan may be considered neutral, and Shatvoryan is a
TIP activist clearly skeptical of the PG's intentions. END
COMMENT.)


5. (C) The second commission created by the PG was an NGO
task force whose job was ostensibly to monitor the overall
work of the PG's Anti-TIP Unit. The task force included five
members -- the two observers from the internal investigation
commission, Hope and Help's Shatvoryan, a representative from
the Association of Audio-Visual Reporters NGO, and the leader
of Democracy Today NGO, who had quit the internal
investigation commission.


6. (C) Armen Boshnaghyan (please protect),a senior
investigator in the Anti-TIP Unit, said the PG instructed his
staff to think about the NGO task force's mandate only after
it had been convened. NGO task force members told us the
task force met only once, at its initial meeting. (COMMENT:
Boshnaghyan seems to be trying to do the right thing, and is
abashed by Yeremyan,s misbehavior. END COMMENT.)

--------------
THE INVESTIGATION
--------------


7. (C) While the probe was underway, the officials under
scrutiny remained in charge of the original investigation,
into the alleged human trafficking case, whose victims had
accused them of misconduct in the first place. Boshnaghyan

YEREVAN 00001524 002.2 OF 002


told us the PG's Office did not have an ethics code to
exclude such practice, nor a separate division to conduct
internal investigations. He said the PG convened an ad-hoc
commission for each investigation. Boshnaghyan told us he
was skeptical about the investigation and predicted that it
would meet the same fate as the previous investigation (ref
C). Boshnaghyan reiterated a warning he has given us several
times: that the PG seems determined to keep Yeremyan in the
Anti-Tip Unit, despite protestations of Yeremyan's repeated
requests to be transferred.


8. (C) According to journalist Baghdasaryan, the internal
investigators met more than once with two of the three
alleged victims. One of them, who had initially complained
that Yeremyan had slapped her while questioning, withdrew her
testimony at one of the meetings. The commission members did
not call in Hope and Help to testify as witnesses.
Baghdasaryan told us that he was called to the PG,s Office
September 28 to see the written results of the investigation,
and to sign the document, which he refused to do. He told us
he disagreed with the results, which cleared the
investigators of all charges of wrongdoing, and that he sent
his own observations to the PG's Office in writing on October

2. (NOTE: Baghdasaryan's credibility with respect to the
Prosecutor's office was called into question in the past,
when he published allegations in a high-profile series
alleging corruption in that office, and refused all
entreaties (including ours) to produce the evidence he
claimed to have. END NOTE.)


9. (C) Task force member Amirkhanyan -- the PG's friend --
told us that while she thought the PG intended to protect his
investigators from allegations of wrongdoing, she was certain
the victims' allegations were groundless. She told us she
had based her opinion on a taped phone conversation she heard
at the Prosecutor's Office, during which the victim
tells the pimp who had allegedly trafficked her to Turkey
that she would rescind her testimony if the pimp paid her.

--------------
COMMENT
--------------


10. (C) Judging from the information we have received so far,
the investigation seems a concerted attempt to convey the
appearance of an objective and thorough probe, but without
any of the effort that would actually render the results
meaningful. We have planned a series of meetings with senior
GOAM officials to raise this matter.
GODFREY