Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06WELLINGTON10
2006-01-08 18:43:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Wellington
Cable title:  

PARLIAMENT'S COMMITTEE RESTRUCTURING REDUCES

Tags:  PGOV PREL NZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHWL #0010/01 0081843
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 081843Z JAN 06
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2225
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHJJAA/JICPAC HONOLULU HI
UNCLAS WELLINGTON 000010 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/ANP
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISA LIZ PHU
PACOM FOR J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
NSC FOR VICTOR CHA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL NZ
SUBJECT: PARLIAMENT'S COMMITTEE RESTRUCTURING REDUCES
LABOUR'S CLOUT

UNCLAS WELLINGTON 000010

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/ANP
SECDEF FOR OSD/ISA LIZ PHU
PACOM FOR J2/J233/J5/SJFHQ
NSC FOR VICTOR CHA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PREL NZ
SUBJECT: PARLIAMENT'S COMMITTEE RESTRUCTURING REDUCES
LABOUR'S CLOUT


1. (SBU) Summary: As a result of the National Party's
strong showing in New Zealand's September elections, the
ruling Labour Party's MPs face far stronger opposition in
Parliament's select committees, which review proposed
legislation. There are signs that National is trying to
make life especially difficult for Labour in the Foreign
Affairs and Defense Select Committee, which has potential
policy implications for us. The new select committee
configurations are also likely to reduce Labour's ability to
pass ambitious legislation during this term. End Summary.


2. (SBU) Select Committees are an important part of New
Zealand,s parliamentary process as they are the principle
means by which legislation is scrutinized. Despite their key
role, New Zealand parliamentary committees have traditionally
been more sedate and far less public than their U.S.
Congressional counterparts. When it comes to influencing
policy direction, NZ political parties tend to allocate more
resources to floor debates rather than select committees.
However, after the 2005 election and a subsequent
reconfiguration, Labour has lost its dominance in select
committee membership across the board. Opposition MPs are
therefore more likely to begin to use the committees to
increase their influence, and this will make it harder for
the Labour Government to promote its legislative agenda.

What's Changed
--------------


3. (SBU) The 2005 election resulted in a reduced majority
for Labour, a surge in support for the National party, and a
diminished standing for most minor parties. As a result,
National has a far greater representation in the new
Parliament and nearly all 18 select committees are now
divided equally between Labour and National. This will
enable National to more easily disrupt Labour's attempts to
pass new legislation. The prominent Foreign Affairs and
Defense Select Committee (FASC) is a case in point.


4. (SBU) FASC was previously led by United Future leader
Peter Dunne, a center right politician with close ties to
Labour. The new chair is Dianne Yates, a Labour stalwart
with strong ties to the party's left. Yates is joined by
fellow Labourites Jill Pettis, HV Ross Robertson, and Paul

Swain, who was most recently Minister of Immigration. But
Labour's taking over the chair will not likely bring any
benefit to the Government. For one thing, National now has
an equal number of MPs on the Committee. They are: Deputy
Chair Georgina TeHeuheu, Tim Groser, John Hayes, and Murray
McCully. Nor can Labour expect support from the committee's
ninth member, the Green Party's Keith Locke, despite the fact
that the Greens strongly favor Labour over National. Locke
is a noted radical on foreign affairs issues, who among other
things has criticized New Zealand's military involvement in
Afghanistan. He is treated with considerable wariness and
reservation by nearly all sitting MPs.


5. (SBU) In addition to having the numbers to make life more
difficult for Labour, the National MPs on the committee
include policy heavyweights Groser and Hayes, both former
ambassadors with considerable field experience. They will
bring intellectual and practical heft that has been long
absent from the committee. McCully lacks foreign policy
expertise, but has been given the position of National's
foreign affairs spokesman because he is a pugnacious debater
skilled in the art of the attack. His target? NZ First
leader Winston Peters, who holds the unorthodox position of
Foreign Minister outside of Cabinet.
National's Cunning Plan
--------------

6. (SBU) National regards the unpredictable Peters and his
position outside Cabinet as the chink in the Governing
arrangement's armor. The party has made no secret of it's
strategy to question both the suitability of Peters as
Foreign Minister and the delicate arrangement that allows him
to hold the position. Most of National's attacks have been
during floor debates in the House. While few Kiwis seem to
have become interested in the issue before Parliament's
summer recess, they may become more engaged once Peters
returns to New Zealand from a long series of foreign trips,
and once Parliament is back in session and members of the
media return to work. In order to boost its attacks on
Peters, it's very possible that National will take a

parallel, more policy-oriented strategy within the FASC by
providing greater and more exacting scrutiny of the
Government,s foreign affairs policies and proposed
legislation.


7. (SBU) Indeed, National has apparently already set in
motion a more muscular approach to contesting policy via the
committee. Prior to the election, the previous FASC members
conducted hearings on the 2002 Terrorism Suppression Act.
This legislation complies with UNSC resolutions 1267 and

1373. Because there was some controversy - on human rights
grounds - when the legislation was passed, a provision was
included requiring a FASC review of the Act's key provisions.
The review was to be reported back to Parliament by December
1, 2005. In order to meet this deadline, the new FASC
members were hurriedly briefed by officials and asked to
finalize the report. National party committee members were
critical of the report, with McCully leading the offensive by
publicly arguing that it rang alarm bells both about the
legislation and the way it is being used (or not used) by the
New Zealand authorities. Although the issue received scant
coverage in the national media and did not substantially
bruise the Government, it could signal a more aggressive
strategy by FASC,s National party members.

Comment
--------------


8. (SBU) Labour can always limit its travails in the FASC by
limiting its foreign policy initiatives this term. Both the
potential for dust-ups in the committee on the one hand, and
the potential for stagnation on the other, could have policy
implications for us. The Embassy will continue to monitor
the committee closely. FASC aside, the Government will have
to choose to fight at least some battles within the select
committees, or risk relative impotence during this third
Labour term.
Burnett