Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06VATICAN51
2006-03-27 15:56:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Vatican
Cable title:
HOLY SEE CONCERNED BY US-INDIA NUCLEAR COOPERATION, IRAN
how-toVZCZCXRO3031 PP RUEHBC RUEHDE RUEHKUK RUEHMOS DE RUEHROV #0051 0861556 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 271556Z MAR 06 FM AMEMBASSY VATICAN TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0285 INFO RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 0005 RUCNIRA/IRAN COLLECTIVE RUEHROV/AMEMBASSY VATICAN 0313
C O N F I D E N T I A L VATICAN 000051
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 3/27/2016
TAGS: PREL PARM ENRG VT IR
SUBJECT: HOLY SEE CONCERNED BY US-INDIA NUCLEAR COOPERATION, IRAN
REF: VATICAN 0029
CLASSIFIED BY: Christopher Sandrolini, Deputy Chief of Mission,
EXEC, State.
REASON: 1.4 (d)
C O N F I D E N T I A L VATICAN 000051
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 3/27/2016
TAGS: PREL PARM ENRG VT IR
SUBJECT: HOLY SEE CONCERNED BY US-INDIA NUCLEAR COOPERATION, IRAN
REF: VATICAN 0029
CLASSIFIED BY: Christopher Sandrolini, Deputy Chief of Mission,
EXEC, State.
REASON: 1.4 (d)
1. (C) Summary. Ambassador discussed India and Iran with Holy
See deputy foreign minister Parolin on March 15. Parolin was
critical of the US-India nuclear cooperation agreement as an
unhelpful signal (i.e., to Iran). While conveying the Holy
See's deep concern over the present confrontation with Iran,
Parolin pressed for caution in dealing with Iran, and expressed
worry about possible military conflict. End summary.
India
--------------
2. (C) Ambassador raised with Parolin recent Echo Chamber points
on India civil nuclear cooperation agreement. Parolin
questioned whether the deal could be considered a "good thing",
making clear that he does not think so, in light of the Iran
situation. He said the Holy See doubts the wisdom of this move,
calling it a "wrong signal". The ambassador responded that
"containment" deals like the India agreement, as well as other
efforts at non-proliferation and "commercial only" solutions for
nuclear fuels, offer the most practical and verifiable chance of
reducing the unwarranted or malicious use of nuclear fuel or
weapons.
Iran
--------------
3. (C) Ambassador suggested Iran should accept the Russian
offer. Parolin emphasized the need for good signals in both
directions on nuclear nonproliferation, as well as on nuclear
disarmament; this would defuse tensions. (He appeared to be
suggesting that US and other nuclear powers need to be more
committed to reducing/eliminating nuclear stockpiles.) He
described the Holy See's deep concern about the situation and
alluded to a recent troubling article in the Italian daily Il
Corriere della Sera (possibly thinking of a recent Washington
Post article alleging that the USG intends to overthrow the
Iranian regime, or to recent USG remarks on "consequences" to
Iran of misbehavior). Ambassador noted that disarmament is
great but perhaps idealistic, as opposed to focusing a united
effort behind non-proliferation programs.
4. (C) The ambassador characterized Iran as unfit to have access
to nuclear weapons. Parolin agreed, noting that Iran had not
complied with the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Still, he said
confrontation should be avoided, and every effort should be made
to find a way out of the situation. He asked the ambassador if
he thought a peaceful solution was possible (the reply was yes).
Parolin noted that Iranian opinion was solidly in favor of the
current course, and observed that Iran has a right to a civilian
nuclear program, as do all NPT members. The examples of
Pakistan and India could not be overlooked. The entire
international community should work together; there should be no
attempt to humiliate Iran. Parolin mused that conflict, such as
airstrikes, would be truly terrible in Iran. Don't isolate
Iran, he urged; open a dialogue. Ambassador agreed.
5. (C) Parolin recalled his February conversation (reftel) with
DCM pointing out that the Holy See had told Iran to comply, to
be transparent, to pursue confidence-building measures, and to
consider a moratorium on uranium enrichment. Parolin urged the
USG to multiply its contacts in Iran and strengthen civil
society, especially moderates.
ROONEY
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 3/27/2016
TAGS: PREL PARM ENRG VT IR
SUBJECT: HOLY SEE CONCERNED BY US-INDIA NUCLEAR COOPERATION, IRAN
REF: VATICAN 0029
CLASSIFIED BY: Christopher Sandrolini, Deputy Chief of Mission,
EXEC, State.
REASON: 1.4 (d)
1. (C) Summary. Ambassador discussed India and Iran with Holy
See deputy foreign minister Parolin on March 15. Parolin was
critical of the US-India nuclear cooperation agreement as an
unhelpful signal (i.e., to Iran). While conveying the Holy
See's deep concern over the present confrontation with Iran,
Parolin pressed for caution in dealing with Iran, and expressed
worry about possible military conflict. End summary.
India
--------------
2. (C) Ambassador raised with Parolin recent Echo Chamber points
on India civil nuclear cooperation agreement. Parolin
questioned whether the deal could be considered a "good thing",
making clear that he does not think so, in light of the Iran
situation. He said the Holy See doubts the wisdom of this move,
calling it a "wrong signal". The ambassador responded that
"containment" deals like the India agreement, as well as other
efforts at non-proliferation and "commercial only" solutions for
nuclear fuels, offer the most practical and verifiable chance of
reducing the unwarranted or malicious use of nuclear fuel or
weapons.
Iran
--------------
3. (C) Ambassador suggested Iran should accept the Russian
offer. Parolin emphasized the need for good signals in both
directions on nuclear nonproliferation, as well as on nuclear
disarmament; this would defuse tensions. (He appeared to be
suggesting that US and other nuclear powers need to be more
committed to reducing/eliminating nuclear stockpiles.) He
described the Holy See's deep concern about the situation and
alluded to a recent troubling article in the Italian daily Il
Corriere della Sera (possibly thinking of a recent Washington
Post article alleging that the USG intends to overthrow the
Iranian regime, or to recent USG remarks on "consequences" to
Iran of misbehavior). Ambassador noted that disarmament is
great but perhaps idealistic, as opposed to focusing a united
effort behind non-proliferation programs.
4. (C) The ambassador characterized Iran as unfit to have access
to nuclear weapons. Parolin agreed, noting that Iran had not
complied with the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Still, he said
confrontation should be avoided, and every effort should be made
to find a way out of the situation. He asked the ambassador if
he thought a peaceful solution was possible (the reply was yes).
Parolin noted that Iranian opinion was solidly in favor of the
current course, and observed that Iran has a right to a civilian
nuclear program, as do all NPT members. The examples of
Pakistan and India could not be overlooked. The entire
international community should work together; there should be no
attempt to humiliate Iran. Parolin mused that conflict, such as
airstrikes, would be truly terrible in Iran. Don't isolate
Iran, he urged; open a dialogue. Ambassador agreed.
5. (C) Parolin recalled his February conversation (reftel) with
DCM pointing out that the Holy See had told Iran to comply, to
be transparent, to pursue confidence-building measures, and to
consider a moratorium on uranium enrichment. Parolin urged the
USG to multiply its contacts in Iran and strengthen civil
society, especially moderates.
ROONEY