Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06USUNNEWYORK344
2006-02-24 00:27:00
CONFIDENTIAL
USUN New York
Cable title:  

HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: GA PRESIDENT PRESENTS NEW

Tags:  PHUM KUNR UNGA PREL 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0011
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUCNDT #0344/01 0550027
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 240027Z FEB 06
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8058
INFO RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 1922
C O N F I D E N T I A L USUN NEW YORK 000344 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

FROM AMBASSADOR BOLTON

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/23/2016
TAGS: PHUM KUNR UNGA PREL
SUBJECT: HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: GA PRESIDENT PRESENTS NEW
TEXT

REF: A. USUN 293

B. USUN 108

C. USUN 166

D. USUN 257

E. STATE 2397

F. MEHRA-WOLFF/ZACK E-MAIL OF FEBRUARY 17

Classified By: Ambassador John R. Bolton, U.S. Representative to the Un
ited Nations, for reasons 1.4(b) and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L USUN NEW YORK 000344

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

FROM AMBASSADOR BOLTON

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/23/2016
TAGS: PHUM KUNR UNGA PREL
SUBJECT: HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: GA PRESIDENT PRESENTS NEW
TEXT

REF: A. USUN 293

B. USUN 108

C. USUN 166

D. USUN 257

E. STATE 2397

F. MEHRA-WOLFF/ZACK E-MAIL OF FEBRUARY 17

Classified By: Ambassador John R. Bolton, U.S. Representative to the Un
ited Nations, for reasons 1.4(b) and (d).


1. (C) Summary and Comment: General Assembly (GA) President
Eliasson presented February 23 to the GA his final text on
the HRC (septel). As foreshadowed in earlier reporting
(reftels),Eliasson settled on arrangements for the HRC that
fall short of U.S. positions on all key points:

-- size: Eliasson text: 47; U.S. position: initially 20,
now up to 45; current Commission: 53;

-- voting threshold: Eliasson text: individual absolute
majority of 96 for each candidate; U.S. position: 2/3
majority for each candidate; current Commission: majority of
present and voting (and de facto vote by acclamation); and,

-- membership criteria: Eliasson text: hortatory standards
and theoretical suspension mechanism; U.S. position:
exclusions for countries under UNSC sanctions for human
rights or terrorism reasons; current Commission: no criteria.


In addition to these key elements, we have highlighted in
paras 5-6 where Eliasson's new text disregards U.S.
positions, where he has improved language over the previous
text, and where he has introduced new elements.


2. (C) The negative elements of the current text are
compounded by the major setback for western interests
introduced in Eliasson's previous text (and retained in the
current one) whereby the adoption of "equitable geographic
distribution" reduces the number of WEOG seats (from ten to
seven) on the proposed Council -- and with it the number of
available seats for which the U.S. could vie. Under the new
Council, Africa would get 13 seats, Asia 13, GRULAC 8, WEOG 7
and Eastern Europe 6, ensuring a permanent majority for Asia
and Africa.


3. (C) UN Secretary General Annan has publicly endorsed the
current text, and most like-minded delegations (including the
EU, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand) have signaled that
their capitals are likely to accept Eliasson's text, not so

much because they are happy with it (the UK told us the text
crossed some of their red lines),but because they fear a
vacuum without it. From where we sit, we see modest
improvements over the Commission in this text (e.g., direct
elections of each member, establishment of the principle of
suspension, stronger language on human rights principles)
outweighed by those elements that do not improve -- or even
diminish -- the Commission's effectiveness and credibility
(e.g., fewer Western seats, term limits, no binding mechanism
to improve quality of membership). Ultimately, this new
Council will be judged by the composition of its membership
and its ability to admonish human rights violators.
Eliasson's text does not guarantee either. End Summary and
Comment.


4. (C) Action Request: Eliasson intends to move for adoption
of his draft resolution next week and foresees no further
negotiations. We request instructions to reopen February 24
objectionable provisions in direct intergovernmental
negotiations. End Action Request.


5. (C) Additional Points Regarding the New Text follow:

-- PP1: maintains the February 1 text regarding "developing
friendly relations among nations based on respect for the
principle of equal rights and self-determination of
peoples..." (U.S. sought deletion or less prominent
placement in the text.)

-- PP 2: maintains language "reaffirming" the Vienna
Declaration (U.S. sought "recalling" vice "reaffirming")

-- PP 7: is a new paragraph "Affirming the need for all
States to continue international efforts to enhance dialogue
and broaden understanding among civilizations, cultures and
religions and emphasizing that States, regional
organizations, non-governmental organizations, religious
bodies and the media have an important role to play in
promoting tolerance, respect for and freedom of religion and
belief." (Note: This is in response to Pakistan/OIC


proposals to address the issue of respect for religions and
cultures, but is not the original proposed language.)

-- PP 12 and OP 4: maintain references to the right to
development (U.S. sought deletion)

-- OP 5(d): continues to read "promote...the follow-up of the
goals and commitments related to the promotion and protection
of human rights emanating from United Nations conferences and
summits" (U.S. sought deletion of the paragraph, or to insert
"relevant" before "UN conferences and summits.")(Note: The
December 19 Co-Chairs text referred to "all" UN conferences
and summits.)

-- OP 5(e): maintains language on the universal periodic
review. A new sentence has been added to say "The Council
shall develop the modalities and necessary time allocation of
the universal periodic review mechanism within one year after
the holding of its first session."

-- OP 5(f): Language is changed to read "the prevention of
human rights violations and respond promptly to human rights
emergencies" (vice February 1 text "respond promptly to
deteriorating human rights situations). (The U.S. had
proposed a reference to responding to "emergencies" in this
paragraph for an earlier draft of the text.)

-- OP 5(i): maintains language from the last text "make
recommendations with regard to the promotion and protection
of human rights" (This text neither specifies to which
bodies recommendations might be made, as we might have hoped,
nor does it call for recommendations to or through the
General Assembly, as many delegations had requested, but
which we opposed.)

-- OP 6: Text still decides that the HRC will assume, review
and where necessary improve and rationalize all mandates,
mechanisms functions and responsibilities of the CHR "in
order to maintain" a system of special procedures, expert
advise and individual complaint procedure. Language remains
unchanged from the February 1 text, except for the deletion
of the word "individual" in reference to the CHR's complaint
procedure and now calling for completion of the review
"within" one year after the first HRC session. (U.S. sought
to make the language, particularly "in order to maintain
them," less strong.)

-- OP 7: Size of the HRC in the new text is 47 (vice 45 in
the February 1 text),and members are to be elected by the
majority of members of the General Assembly (vice two-thirds
or simple majority of the members present and voting). The
allocation of seats to the regional groups "based on
equitable geographic distribution" is therefore modified,
with the African Group getting 13, the Asian Group 13, the
Eastern European Group 6, GRULAC 8 and WEOG 7. (The new text
maintains the language that HRC members shall be elected
"directly and individually by secret ballots.")

-- OP 8: OP 8 has been changed. The GA President's February
23 text includes a new sentence which reads: "The General
Assembly, by a two-thirds majority of the members present and
voting, may suspend the rights of membership in the Council
of a member of the Human Rights Council that commits gross
and systematic violations of human rights." The new text
deletes the third sentence of the February 1 text (which had
called for Member States, when electing HRC members, to take
into account whether there are any situations that constitute
systematic and gross violations of human rights or any agreed
measures currently in place at the United Nations against a
candidate for human rights violations). The second sentence
also has been modified slightly in the new text to read "When
electing members of the Council, Member States shall take
into account the candidates' contribution to the promotion
and protection of human rights and their voluntary pledges
and commitments made thereto."

-- OP 9: Text was strengthened to read Members elected to
the Council "shall uphold" the highest standards in the
promotion and protection of human rights (vice February 1
text "shall be guided by" the highest standards).

-- OP 10: The text calls for "not fewer than" three sessions
(vice "meetings") per year, including a main session for a
total duration of no less than 10 weeks. Special sessions
can be held at the request of an HRC member with the support
of one-third of the HRC membership. (There is no provision
for the additional possibility of meetings to be called by
the High Commissioner for Human Rights or the
Secretary-General, as we preferred. U.S. also called for

SIPDIS
meetings to be agreed by a simple majority of the Council.)




6. Other small modifications to the text:

-- PP 10: Small modification to refer to strengthening the
capacity of Member States to comply with their human rights
obligations for the benefit of all "human beings" (vice
February 1 text referring to "all rights holders.")

-- P 5(a): Modification for providing technical assistance
and capacity building "in consultation with and with the
consent of the Members States concerned" (vice February 1
text "in consultation and with the consent of Member States).

-- OP 13: Small modification to the date for abolishment of
the CHR on June 16 (vice June 15 in February 1 text)

-- OP 15: Small modification to the date for the first
meeting of the Council to be held on June 19 (vice June 16 in
February 1 text).
BOLTON