Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06USUNNEWYORK2046
2006-10-26 20:07:00
UNCLASSIFIED
USUN New York
Cable title:  

UN LEGAL COUNSEL REPORTS ON EFFORTS TO CONCLUDE

Tags:  UNSC PGOV PREL PTER KCRM SY LE 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0001
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUCNDT #2046/01 2992007
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 262007Z OCT 06
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0578
INFO RUEHLB/AMEMBASSY BEIRUT IMMEDIATE 0823
RUEHDM/AMEMBASSY DAMASCUS IMMEDIATE 0312
UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 002046 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

FOR IO:KSILVERBERG, L/AN:LJACOBSON, NEA/ELA:ADONICK

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: UNSC PGOV PREL PTER KCRM SY LE
SUBJECT: UN LEGAL COUNSEL REPORTS ON EFFORTS TO CONCLUDE
TEXTS ESTABLISHING HARIRI TRIBUNAL

REF: A. STATE 166376

B. USUN 1366

UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 002046

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

FOR IO:KSILVERBERG, L/AN:LJACOBSON, NEA/ELA:ADONICK

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: UNSC PGOV PREL PTER KCRM SY LE
SUBJECT: UN LEGAL COUNSEL REPORTS ON EFFORTS TO CONCLUDE
TEXTS ESTABLISHING HARIRI TRIBUNAL

REF: A. STATE 166376

B. USUN 1366


1. (SBU) BEGIN SUMMARY: Legal Adviser John Bellinger and
Ambassador Wolff met with UN Legal Counsel Nicolas Michel and
his deputy, Larry Johnson, October 25, to discuss Lebanese
and key Council members' views on the draft statute and
agreement to establish a tribunal to try those responsible
for the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq
Hariri. Michel said the Russians had presented extensive
objections to the texts, arguing among other things that the
tribunal should exercise jurisdiction only over Hariri's
assassination and sentences should be served in the
defendants' states of nationality. After consulting with the
Lebanese and the Secretary-General, the Office of Legal
Affairs (OLA) has decided to wait to send the texts
officially to the Lebanese until the P-5 have reached
agreement. Stressing the need to conclude the texts soon,
Bellinger and Wolff urged OLA go back to the Russians
promptly to answer Russian questions about the texts, to
offer edits where possible, and to stress that OLA would not
accept all of Russia's proposed changes. Finally, Michel
summarized his October 25 discussions with the Syrians and
their UK lawyer, Philippe Sands. END SUMMARY.


2. (SBU) At an October 25 meeting, UN Legal Counsel Michel
updated Legal Adviser Bellinger and Ambassador Wolff on his
consultations with the Lebanese, the P-5, Japan, and Qatar,
concerning the draft texts to establish the Hariri tribunal.
Michel said the Lebanese had assented unofficially to the
texts. Russia, France, the U.S., and Japan provided
comments, with Russia expressing extensive concerns about the
draft texts, and indicating that its list of concerns was
"preliminary." Japan focused its comments on financing, but
said the tribunal should only exercise jurisdiction over
Hariri's assassination. (Comment: USUN believes Japan has
some flexibility on the jurisdictional question and will not
block the texts if OLA does not amend the language. End
Comment.)

--------------

Russia's Objections
--------------


3. (SBU) Reading from Russia's five-page response to OLA,
which provided Russia's "preliminary" views, Michel
identified 12 Russian objections or concerns:

--Jurisdiction (Article 1 of Statute): Russia called the
references to the "terrorist attack" and "terrorist attacks"
in this article "prejudicial." Russia said this provision
should be narrowed to limit the tribunal's jurisdiction to
the Hariri case. Russia argued that extending jurisdiction
to the "other related terrorist attacks of a similar nature
and gravity which occurred in Lebanon between 1 October 2004
and 12 December 2005 or any later date decided by agreement
of the Parties and the consent of the Security Council"
exceeds the Secretariat's mandate under UN Security Council
Resolution 1664 (2006).

--Applicable Law (Article 2(c) of Statute): Russia
questioned the inclusion of this paragraph, which refers to
"the provisions of international law applicable to Lebanon in
relation to the prosecution and punishment of the crimes
referred to" in Article 2(a). Bellinger said the United
States also did not understand the need for this provision.
Michel argued that the provision was necessary to preserve
the tribunal's "international character."

--Individual Criminal Responsibility (Article 3 of Statute):
Russia questioned the inclusion of language concerning
vicarious liability that would cover any person who
"otherwise participated in the planning, preparation or
execution of a crime," and make such persons individually
responsible for a crime. The Russians apparently argued that
there was no need for any such provision and that the issue
of vicarious liability should be governed by existing
Lebanese law.

--UNIIIC/Tribunal: Russia questioned the relationship
between the tribunal and the International Independent
Investigation Commission, questioning the need to establish
the tribunal before the Commission has completed its mandate
and arguing that the prosecutor should not conduct another
investigation. Russia also said the tribunal's judges should
have discretion to review evidence collected by the
Commission and then decide whether to admit it.

--Trials in Absentia (Article 22 of Statute): Russia


complained that no other tribunal statutes permit trials in
absentia.

--Election of Officials (Articles 9 and 11 of Statute):
Judges and prosecutors should be elected by the Security
Council, not appointed by the Secretary-General, Russia said.
Only governments should nominate candidates.

--Defense Office (various provisions of Statute and GOL/UN
Agreement): The defense office should have the same status
as the prosecutor's office, apparently meaning that the
defense would have the same authority to compel documents and
testimony as the prosecution.

--ICTY/ICTR (Articles 24, 26, 28 of Statute): Russia
cautioned against letting the tribunal be guided by the
practice of the International Criminal Tribunals for the
Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda; instead, the tribunal should be
guided by the norms and standards of the UN.

--Enforcement of Sentences (Article 29 of Statute):
Convicted defendants should serve their sentences in their
countries of nationality or permanent residence.

--Russia opposes the establishment of a Management Committee
(Article 6 of GOL/UN Agreement).

--Entry into Force (Article 19 of GOL/UN Agreement): Michel
did not elaborate on Russia's concerns.

--Termination (Article 21 of GOL/UN Agreement): The
agreement and statute should terminate automatically in three
years, unless the Security Council and the Lebanese agree to
extend the tribunal.

--------------
Syrian Reactions
--------------


4. (SBU) Michel also said he met with Syrian PermRep
Ja'afari and the Syrian legal adviser, along with Philippe
Sands, a professor of international law at University College
London who is representing Syria, on October 25. According
to Michel, Sands dominated the discussion and referred
specifically to all of the previous draft texts OLA had
prepared. Among other things, Sands questioned the deletion
of the "crimes against humanity language," arguing that
eliminating that language would dilute the tribunal's
international character. The Syrian ambassador made three
political points: 1) the tribunal's jurisdiction should be
limited to the Hariri case, 2) judges representing the state
of nationality of the accused should be appointed; and 3) the
criminal law of a defendant's state should apply.

--------------
Next Steps
--------------


5. (SBU) Michel, Bellinger, and Wolff then discussed how
best to conclude the texts soon. Once OLA has secured key
Council members' agreement on the texts, OLA intends to
provide the texts officially to the Lebanese, who would then
indicate their preliminary official consent. The Lebanese
would send the texts to the Cabinet of Ministers and
Parliament only after the Security Council has approved the
texts, however. Michel said he had wanted to send the drafts
formally to the Lebanese this week, but after consulting with
the Lebanese and the Secretary-General had decided to try to
reach consensus among the P-5 first. He said the French have
demarched the Russians in Moscow, and as a result, Moscow has
instructed the Russian Mission to show "flexibility,"
particularly on the question of expanding the tribunal's
jurisdiction beyond Hariri, though it remains to be seen
exactly how this greater flexibility will translate.


6. (SBU) Michel said the Secretary-General is prepared to
convene the P-5 ambassadors in an effort to work out an
agreement, but Bellinger and Wolff advised OLA to go back to
the Russians first. They recommended that OLA edit the texts
where possible and then provide the Russians detailed
responses to some of the other comments they had raised. For
example, they suggested that OLA could modify the text to
require the Council to undertake a review of the tribunal
within three years. The tribunal would not be terminated
automatically unless the Council and the Lebanese agreed
following that review. But OLA also would tell the Russians
that OLA could simply not make all of the changes the
Russians seek. Michel said he would meet the Russians on
October 25 or 26.



--------------
P-3 Meeting
--------------


7. (SBU) Later on October 25, Bellinger briefed French Legal
Adviser Edwige Belliard and UK Legal Adviser Daniel Benjamin
on the U.S. meeting with Michel. Both were scheduled to meet
with Michel (on October 25 and 26, respectively) and agreed
that OLA should work with the Russians without conceding much
ground. All agreed that the French would likely have the
most diplomatic leverage over the Russians.

BOLTON