Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06USUNNEWYORK1880
2006-09-29 20:37:00
UNCLASSIFIED
USUN New York
Cable title:  

61ST UNGA LAUNCHES GLOBAL COUNTER-TERRORISM

Tags:  PTER UNGA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0012
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUCNDT #1880 2722037
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 292037Z SEP 06
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0302
INFO RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA 1134
RUEHLB/AMEMBASSY BEIRUT 0789
RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO 0735
RUEHHE/AMEMBASSY HELSINKI 0445
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID 6191
RUEHMKA/AMEMBASSY MANAMA 0061
RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE 1896
RUEHTV/AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV 1243
UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 001880 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PTER UNGA
SUBJECT: 61ST UNGA LAUNCHES GLOBAL COUNTER-TERRORISM
STRATEGY

REF: USUN 01816

UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 001880

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PTER UNGA
SUBJECT: 61ST UNGA LAUNCHES GLOBAL COUNTER-TERRORISM
STRATEGY

REF: USUN 01816


1. On September 19, the UN launched the "Global
Counter-Terrorism Strategy" at a meeting chaired by General
Assembly President Khalifa. The "launch" attracted a number
of Foreign Ministers and Ambassadors. The strategy, called
for in the 2005 World Summit Outcome document was the result
of several months of negotiations. It sets forth a strategic
framework for increased cooperation among member states, the
UN Secretariat and other relevant international organizations
to counter terrorist activities.


2. When the General Assembly adopted the Strategy on
September 8, it decided to introduce the plan at a
high-level meeting during its sixty-first session. GA
President Sheikha Al Khalifa opened the program and called
for states to translate their words into actions. Deputy
Secretary Mark Malloch Brown delivered a statement on behalf

SIPDIS
of the Secretary General which echoed that sentiment saying,
"If future generations are to live in a world free from
terrorism and its inhumane tactics, Member States must embark
without delay on the journey they have mapped out so
carefully; they must start translating their commitments into
reality at once." Statements by the Ministers of Singapore
and Spain, whose Permanent Representatives had chaired the
negotiations, followed. Finland (as EU President),Egypt,
Israel, Turkey, Japan, Philippines, Lebanon, Switzerland,
Australia (speaking as representative of the CANZ),the U.K.,
Yemen and the Russian Federation also spoke.


3. Many of the statements stressed global cooperation,
de-legitimization of the killing of civilians, and ensuring
that the Strategy stayed a "living document" that could
respond to future challenges. All speakers mentioned the
need to both ratify and enforce the various international
anti-terrorism agreements.


4. The Finnish Foreign Minister said that the consensus
adoption of the strategy sent a strong political signal which
showed the Assembly's resolve to unite behind the shared goal
of combating terrorism. She also stressed that it is
imperative that all measures against terrorism comply with
international law. The Turkish Deputy Foreign Minister said
the launch of the CT Strategy was a landmark development that
needed to be recognized by all.


5. The Egyptian Foreign Minister noted that the strategy
would provide the UN with an opportunity to step out of a
narrow perspective when dealing with international terrorism
towards a global unified perspective. He said that,
"Undoubtedly, the convening of this high-level meeting
responds to the initiative launched by President Hosni
Mubarak to hold such a meeting under the auspices of the
United Nations reaffirms the Egyptian vision that the success
of national efforts to counter-terrorism is bound by vast
international cooperation including the engagement of the
United Nations and its main bodies......". (Comment. When
asked later whether Egypt considered the strategy launch to
be a substitute for the meeting they have proposed, the
Egyptian Mission Legal Adviser said that was not their
intention. End Comment.)


6. For the most part, comments were general in nature and
did not delve into detailed explanations of positions
regarding elements of the document. Only Israel singled out
other countries by name (Iran and Syria) for criticism. An
attempt by Lebanon to reply to the Israeli comments was
thwarted by the Chair who, having previously closed the
speakers list, concluded the meeting.
BOLTON