Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06USUNNEWYORK1283
2006-06-29 13:34:00
UNCLASSIFIED
USUN New York
Cable title:  

SECURITY COUNCIL DEBATES INTERNATIONAL LAW

Tags:  AORC KJUS UNSC 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0001
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUCNDT #1283/01 1801334
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 291334Z JUN 06
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9453
INFO RUEHGG/UN SECURITY COUNCIL COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHTC/AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE IMMEDIATE 8811
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA IMMEDIATE 2189
UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 001283 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

PLEASE PASS TO IO/UNP: JROBERTSON AND L/UNA:MMATTLER

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC KJUS UNSC
SUBJECT: SECURITY COUNCIL DEBATES INTERNATIONAL LAW

REF: 06 STATE 103574

UNCLAS USUN NEW YORK 001283

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

PLEASE PASS TO IO/UNP: JROBERTSON AND L/UNA:MMATTLER

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: AORC KJUS UNSC
SUBJECT: SECURITY COUNCIL DEBATES INTERNATIONAL LAW

REF: 06 STATE 103574


1. BEGIN SUMMARY: Security Council members joined by 16
other representatives of UN Missions debated the topic of the
Security Council and international law on June 22, 2006.
Nicolas Michel, Under-Secretary-General for Legal Affairs,
and President of the International Court of Justice (ICJ),
Rosalyn Higgins, also spoke at the meeting, which Danish
Foreign Minister Per Stig Moller chaired. Delegations
addressed three themes set out in a discussion paper the
Danish Presidency circulated beforehand: (1) promoting the
rule of law in conflict and post-conflict situations; (2)
ending impunity for international crimes; and (3) enhancing
the efficiency and credibility of UN sanctions regimes.
Ambassador Bolton delivered the U.S. statement, and Danish
Foreign Minister Moller read a Statement on behalf of the
Council on international law after the debate (reftel).
Statements, as available, have been sent electronically to
IO/UNP and L/UNA. END SUMMARY.


2. Danish Foreign Minister Moller opened the Security
Council's debate on international law June 22 by saying
discussion should aim to provide a forum to consider how the
Council could further contribute to, strengthen, and develop
an international order based on the rule of law. In her
presentation, ICJ President Higgins argued that early
recourse to third party settlement, including through the
ICJ, could resolve at least some of the problems the Danes
had identified in framing the debate. To mobilize the ICJ's
potential, she suggested the Council consider whether to
develop a policy under which, in all political disputes that
threaten peace and where assertions of legal entitlement are
made, the Council would indicate strongly to the parties that
they are expected to have recourse to the ICJ. She also
urged the Council to use Article 36(3) of the Charter as a
central policy tool. Article 36(3) provides that in making
recommendations for the settlement of disputes the Council
"should also take into consideration that legal disputes as a
general rule should be referred by the parties to the
International Court of Justice."


3. In his remarks, Legal Counsel Michel summarized the
Secretary-General's recent letter to the Security Council

SIPDIS

providing views on the appropriate minimum standards for the
Council's sanctions committees to follow in listing and
de-listing individuals and entities. Michael set out four
minimum elements for ensuring that the sanctions committees'
procedures are equitable and transparent, arguing that the
designated person/entity should have the right to review by
an "effective" review mechanism. (Comment: USUN has
stressed to Michel and his staff that Council members -- not
the Secretary-General -- should determine procedures for the
UN sanctions committees and that the Secretary-General should
provide views only if the Security Council requested them.
End comment.)

The Role of the Security Council in International Law
-------------- --------------


4. Several Security Council delegations cited the Council's
central role in forming and applying the rules of
international law, consistent with its mandate under the UN
Charter to secure international peace and security, while
several non-Council members asserted the General Assembly's
primacy. For example, Liechtenstein, Mexico, Egypt, and
Venezuela cautioned the Council against encroaching on the
authority of the General Assembly. Liechtenstein and Mexico
also highlighted their initiative to include an item on "the
rule of law at the national and international levels" on the
agenda of the 61st General Assembly. (Comment: Mexican
Deputy PermRep Gomez Robledo will chair the Sixth Committee
in the 61st General Assembly. End comment.) If the Council
is to realize its full potential to strengthen international
law and to help instill the rule of law, South Africa said
comprehensive reform is necessary to address the Council's
composition and working methods.

The Rule of Law in Conflict/Post-Conflict Situations
-------------- --------------


5. Most delegations stressed the importance of
re-establishing the rule of law in post-conflict states, and
some proposed ways the UN could enhance its efforts to do so.
Denmark said the Council promotes the rule of law in
post-conflict national societies to ensure the stability and
legitimacy of those societies. The UK, Argentina, Tanzania,
and Austria (speaking on behalf of the EU) advocated the
establishment of a rule of law assistance unit in the
Secretariat. Japan said the UN should compile a collection

SIPDIS

of best practices relating to establishing the rule of law,
and Switzerland recommended that the Council adopt a body of
practices concerning the authorization of the use of force.
Slovakia and Greece called on the Security Council to mandate
peacekeeping and peacebuilding operations to address
transitional justice and rule of law activities. Similarly,
Tanzania said the Council must strengthen mechanisms to
protect civilians in armed conflicts and post-conflict
situations.


6. Most delegations also emphasized the role of the Security
Council in preventing conflict and promoting the peaceful
settlement of disputes. In this regard, the UK, Greece, and
Peru urged states that have not done so to accept the
compulsory jurisdiction of the ICJ and resort to the ICJ more
frequently.

Ending Impunity
--------------


7. Delegations emphasized the need for the Security Council
to end impunity, and many called for leadership to ensure
that efforts to secure peace and justice do not become
mutually exclusive. Argentina, France, Greece, Tanzania, the
UK, and Canada (speaking also on behalf of Australia and New
Zealand) cited the International Criminal Tribunal for the
Former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for
Rwanda, or the Special Court for Sierra Leone as mechanisms
the Council uses to fight impunity. France also said it
looked forward to the conclusion of an agreement between the
UN and the Lebanese government to establish a tribunal of an
international character to try those responsible for the
assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri.
In contrast, Russia expressed discomfort at the Council's
increasing resort to Chapter VII to promote the rule of law,
saying the Council should act under Chapter VII only when
there is a threat to international peace and security and it
has exhausted all other measures. Various delegations also
called for the Security Council to continue to cooperate with
and support the International Criminal Court and urged states
that have not yet done so to become a party to the Rome
Statute.

UN Sanctions
--------------


8. Delegations stressed the need for fair and effective
procedures in applying UN sanctions and expressed support for
the 1267 Committee's efforts to revise its listing and
de-listing guidelines. The UK, Austria, and Greece welcomed
the Brown University Watson Institute's paper on
strengthening targeted sanctions, which the governments of
Sweden, Switzerland, and Germany commissioned. Greece also
associated itself with the Secretary-General's proposals,
while Qatar lamented that the sanctions committees' existing
procedures do not ensure due process. Ghana supported the
creation of an appeal or review mechanism and said it would
"examine favorably" France's proposal to establish a focal
point in the UN for transmitting listing and de-listing
requests. In an indirect reference to the U.S. proposal for
revising the 1267 Committee's listing and de-listing
procedures, Slovakia said permitting individuals and entities
to submit de-listing petitions to any member of the Security
Council seems "reasonable." Slovakia then appeared to temper
its support for the U.S. proposals, mentioning that an
external process to review sanctions committees' decisions
could be useful.


9. Delegations also commented generally on UN sanctions
regimes. China and Nigeria both said strict standards and
timelines must be set for sanctions to mitigate their
negative humanitarian effects, and China reiterated its
position that the Security Council must apply sanctions
cautiously and avoid "double standards." Venezuela argued
that the Council should employ sanctions only when diplomacy
fails and said the Council's increasing resort to sanctions
targeting individuals exceeds its authority under the UN
Charter. Although many delegations emphasized the need to
strengthen the efficacy of UN sanctions, Canada made the most
forceful statement, advocating improving and strengthening
experts' panels and other mechanisms to monitor sanctions
implementation.


10. Comment: In a testament to the Danes' careful planning,
the debate ran smoothly, with most delegations making
measured statements. Despite Denmark's high-level
representation, only eight other Council members' permanent
representatives attended even part of the time. The
remaining countries were represented by DPR's or below. End

comment.
BOLTON