Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06USUNNEWYORK1224
2006-06-16 19:45:00
CONFIDENTIAL
USUN New York
Cable title:  

DEVELOPMENT RESOLUTION NEGOTIATIONS SHIFT INTO NEW

Tags:  EAID EFIN KUNR UNGA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0013
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUCNDT #1224/01 1671945
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 161945Z JUN 06
FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK
TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9357
C O N F I D E N T I A L USUN NEW YORK 001224 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/16/2016
TAGS: EAID EFIN KUNR UNGA
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT RESOLUTION NEGOTIATIONS SHIFT INTO NEW
MODE AS FACILITATOR DEPARTS

REF: USUN 1079

Classified By: Ambassador Terry Miller, Reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L USUN NEW YORK 001224

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/16/2016
TAGS: EAID EFIN KUNR UNGA
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT RESOLUTION NEGOTIATIONS SHIFT INTO NEW
MODE AS FACILITATOR DEPARTS

REF: USUN 1079

Classified By: Ambassador Terry Miller, Reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)


1. (u) The current phase of negotiations on the development
resolution in follow-up to the World Summit Outcome ended at
midnight Thursday (6/16-17) without an agreed text.
Facilitator Paul Lolo of Nigeria will no longer be available
and responsibility for further progress will revert back to
the Co-chairs of the process, Ambassadors Verbeke (Belgium)
and Diarra (Mali). No further negotiations are scheduled at
this time, but we expect a renewed effort next week, perhaps
at a more senior level.

State of the text.


2. (c) Approximately 50 of the approximately 80 paragraphs
remaining in the text are fully agreed, though there is no
agreement on the placement of many of the paragraphs or the
overall structure of the resolution. Most of the core
economic issues that are normally the most difficult in
negotiations of this type, such as ODA levels and targets,
trade, debt, investment, innovative sources of financing, and
globalization, have been agreed. Several of the remaining
issues (e.a. governance or policy space) have agreed text in
the draft but are not agreed for inclusion as delegations
struggle over the balance of the overall text. Other
outstanding issues include:

-- G-77 proposal to add a reaffirmation of the "commitments"
of UN conferences and summits in the first preambular
paragraph. This crosses the US redline concerning
reaffirmation of the Durbin racism conference, Beijing
women's conference, and Cairo population conference. US is
holding out for reaffirmation of the "development goals and
objectives" of the conferences, the formulation used in the
summit.

-- Monitoring: This issue appears in several places where
the G-77 is attempting to create new monitoring mechanisms
within the UN. All other delegations are resisting strongly.
The fault lines are whether G-77 as well as donor
commitments should be monitored, the extent of UN
involvement, and the extent to which new mechanisms are
needed.

-- Power of the G-77 in the Bretton Woods Institutions: G-77
is attempting to move beyond the summit language to call for

"effective measures" in this regard. All other delegations
are resisting strongly.

-- Duty free market access for least developed countries -
G-77 is trying to remove the "work towards" caveat. US and
JUSCANZ are resisting. US has offered "commitments related
to duty free access" as a compromise, but G-77 has not moved.

--Reaffirmation of Beijing Declaration - US is isolated in
insisting on a direct quote of the summit language. Main
proponents of stronger language are the EU and CANZ.

-- Climate change - US is in a centrist position between EU
and CANZ. Most interesting dynamic here is Canada's change
in position from the summit (they can no longer accept
references to the Kyoto Protocol) as a result of their change
in government. G-77 has entered the debate late with a
request for a spoiler reference to "special and differential
treatment."

-- Agricultural development - G-77 is trying to amend summit
language to remove any responsibility by the developing
countries to do anything in this area and place all of the
responsibility on the "international community." All others
are resisting.

-- Strengthening the role of the General Assembly - G-77 has
introduced language from GA resolution 57/270B (one of many
attempts by the G-77 to import language from this resolution
rather than the summit outcome document into the text)
calling for strengthening the role of the GA in conference
follow-up. All others are resisting, with the US pointing
out that the paragraph in 57/270B was followed by specific
measures to accomplish this strengthening, all of which have
already been accomplished. US and others are proposing
summit language on "the central position of the GA" as an
alternative.

--UNCTAD - G-77 is insisting on quoting para 27(a) of 57/270B
on the role of UNCTAD. US and others are resisting, noting
that there is no mention of UNCTAD in the outcome document.
This is an area where we might have some flexibility.

--System wide coherence and the High-Level Panel - An EU
proposal supported by the US is being rejected by the G-77



--Corporate environmental and social responsibility - G-77,
supported gently by JUSCANZ, is insisting on these
references. US, supported by EU, is insisting on the summit
formulation of "corporate responsibility and accountability."

Negotiation dynamics


3. (c) This negotiation has moved by fits and starts, and
has proceeded in a highly unusual way. The typical pattern
in recent days has been to make rapid progress in the
morning, including significant agreement on normally
difficult issues, building a lot of momentum. Then,
following G-77 coordination meetings at lunchtime, the
negotiation freezes in place as the G-77 stonewalls on all
remaining issues for the rest of the day. Afternoon sessions
have also occasionally included either India or Cuba
replacing South Africa as the G-77 spokesperson, though South
Africa remained in the room. China and Venezuela are
increasingly attending the informals. Issues that are
normally easily resolved or which have obvious solutions from
the facilitator's point of view (and ours) remain rigidly
locked. The facilitator has told us that "there are dynamics
and issues beyond what is present in the room" at work. Our
judgment is that remaining issues could be readily resolved
through use of agreed language if the political will to do so
were present. Interestingly, Pakistan has for brief periods
been called upon to replace the facilitator. On the EU side,
at least 15 EU members are now sending representatives daily
to support/monitor the negotiations, up from 6-8 regular
attendees at the negotiations' midpoint. Representatives from
countries in EU accession negotiations have also started to
appear.

Next steps


4. (u) The process now reverts to the control of the
Co-chairs, and perhaps President Eliasson himself. We would
expect negotiations to resume in some format at some point
next week, despite the intense preparations now underway for
the summer ECOSOC session. Many delegations have noted their
desire to complete the (frozen in place) ECOSOC reform
resolution before the summer session starts on July 3, but
that appears increasingly unrealistic with each day.


BOLTON