Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06USUNNEWYORK1079
2006-05-26 19:37:00
CONFIDENTIAL
USUN New York
Cable title:
DEVELOPMENT NEGOTIATIONS PAUSE AS G77 DEPARTS FOR
VZCZCXYZ0015 PP RUEHWEB DE RUCNDT #1079 1461937 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 261937Z MAY 06 FM USMISSION USUN NEW YORK TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9170
C O N F I D E N T I A L USUN NEW YORK 001079
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/26/2016
TAGS: EAID EFIN KUNR UNGA
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT NEGOTIATIONS PAUSE AS G77 DEPARTS FOR
NAM SUMMIT
REF: (A)USUN 1034 (B)STATE 85232
Classified By: Ambassador Terry Miller. Reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)
C O N F I D E N T I A L USUN NEW YORK 001079
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/26/2016
TAGS: EAID EFIN KUNR UNGA
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT NEGOTIATIONS PAUSE AS G77 DEPARTS FOR
NAM SUMMIT
REF: (A)USUN 1034 (B)STATE 85232
Classified By: Ambassador Terry Miller. Reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)
1.(SBU) Informal negotiations on the Development Follow-up
Resolution have paused until June 5, when the G-77 team will
be back in New York and ready to engage. The facilitator for
these negotiations has noted his intention to move into daily
sessions at that time to meet an informal deadline of June 15
laid out by the President of the General Assembly. The US has
asked for meetings to resume earlier -- even in a small group
format -- if the G-77 can field a negotiating team. Many
delegations have noted that working past mid-June on this
resolution or on the ECOSOC Reform resolution will become
impossible due to the intense preparations expected to be
underway for the ECOSOC Summer Session, which opens July 3 in
Geneva.
2.(SBU) Ambassador Miller will be meeting with G77 Chair
Ambassador Kumalo June 2 on his return from a Non-Aligned
Movement (NAM) meeting in Kuala Lumpur to intensify the
dialogue on the economic and development issues contained
within the non-paper referenced in ref (B).
3.(C) Per ref (B),we also met with the Co-chair for the
Development Follow-up resolution, Ambassador Verbeke of
Belgium, to request re-circulation of the Co-chairs' draft
resolution from January. Amb Verbeke acknowledged that the
negotiations needed a fresh start, but felt that
re-circulation of the Co-chairs' text would be seen by the
G-77 as "provocative." He and Ambassador Miller discussed
alternative ways to generate momentum, including the
possibility of a new Co-chairs' text and the likelihood that
the Co-chairs would need to take control of the negotiating
process from the facilitator at some point.
BOLTON
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/26/2016
TAGS: EAID EFIN KUNR UNGA
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT NEGOTIATIONS PAUSE AS G77 DEPARTS FOR
NAM SUMMIT
REF: (A)USUN 1034 (B)STATE 85232
Classified By: Ambassador Terry Miller. Reasons 1.4 (B) and (D)
1.(SBU) Informal negotiations on the Development Follow-up
Resolution have paused until June 5, when the G-77 team will
be back in New York and ready to engage. The facilitator for
these negotiations has noted his intention to move into daily
sessions at that time to meet an informal deadline of June 15
laid out by the President of the General Assembly. The US has
asked for meetings to resume earlier -- even in a small group
format -- if the G-77 can field a negotiating team. Many
delegations have noted that working past mid-June on this
resolution or on the ECOSOC Reform resolution will become
impossible due to the intense preparations expected to be
underway for the ECOSOC Summer Session, which opens July 3 in
Geneva.
2.(SBU) Ambassador Miller will be meeting with G77 Chair
Ambassador Kumalo June 2 on his return from a Non-Aligned
Movement (NAM) meeting in Kuala Lumpur to intensify the
dialogue on the economic and development issues contained
within the non-paper referenced in ref (B).
3.(C) Per ref (B),we also met with the Co-chair for the
Development Follow-up resolution, Ambassador Verbeke of
Belgium, to request re-circulation of the Co-chairs' draft
resolution from January. Amb Verbeke acknowledged that the
negotiations needed a fresh start, but felt that
re-circulation of the Co-chairs' text would be seen by the
G-77 as "provocative." He and Ambassador Miller discussed
alternative ways to generate momentum, including the
possibility of a new Co-chairs' text and the likelihood that
the Co-chairs would need to take control of the negotiating
process from the facilitator at some point.
BOLTON