Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06TOKYO596
2006-02-02 09:04:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Tokyo
Cable title:  

ITER: MORE ON FINALIZATION

Tags:  PREL ENRG ITER TRGY KSCA JA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0011
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHKO #0596/01 0330904
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 020904Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8209
INFO RUCNITN/ITER COLLECTIVE
RHMCSUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS TOKYO 000596 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

OES/SAT FOR MAXSTADT
EAP/J FOR WINSHIP
STAS FOR REYNOLDS
DOE FOR HARDING AND M.ROBERTS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL ENRG ITER TRGY KSCA JA
SUBJECT: ITER: MORE ON FINALIZATION

REF: A. STATE 16118


B. TOKYO 502

C. STATE 13967

UNCLAS TOKYO 000596

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

OES/SAT FOR MAXSTADT
EAP/J FOR WINSHIP
STAS FOR REYNOLDS
DOE FOR HARDING AND M.ROBERTS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL ENRG ITER TRGY KSCA JA
SUBJECT: ITER: MORE ON FINALIZATION

REF: A. STATE 16118


B. TOKYO 502

C. STATE 13967


1. (U) This is an action request. Please see paragraph
seven.


2. (SBU) On February 2, EST M/C and ESToff met with the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) International Science
Cooperation Office Director Kozo Honsei and others and
delivered reftel demarche. Honsei thanked EST M/C for the
clear USG commitment to use the IOIA for ITER as conveyed in
the talking points which were left as a non-paper. Honsei
said that it might be helpful to use the Record of Discussion
document in Barcelona (as mentioned previously),but that
Tokyo would talk with the other partners to see if it is
indeed necessary or not. Honsei elaborated that some of the
partners may have a preference to not produce a Record of
Discussion from the Barcelona meeting. He said that the
partners could work out how they would like to do this --
whether in the form of a Record or press release or something
else -- at that meeting. In response to EST M/C's request
for confirmation, Honsei agreed that the U.S. offer as
described in reftel was sufficient to meet the GOJ's earlier
request for a tangible confirmation.


3. (SBU) Honsei also thanked Washington for the quick
response to MOF's questions. MOF has some additional
questions that are listed in paragraph six. Honsei asked for
a response to the inquiry as soon as possible, but noted that
the responses were not/not a precondition for the Barcelona
meeting. He said that the answers were necessary to "fix the
P&I agreement" because MOF will have to think about
reciprocity when U.S. researchers come to Japan. He
explained that all of the questions were due to the fact that
this was the first time in Japan's experience that the IOIA
agreement was being used in such a small organization. EST
M/C reassured Honsei that the U.S. has managed to have the
mechanism successfully work in other small international
organizations that Japan may not be a part of in the past.


4. (SBU) Turning away from P&I, Honsei then offered some
additional points for consideration. He said that Tokyo
faced another "headache" because of the Russian delegation's
request for budget tables and definition of rules. Regarding
a timetable, MOFA will still need to ask the legal department
in the Cabinet Office to process the entire ITER agreement
including the questions posed by the Russians. EST M/C
underscored the importance of completing this process as soon
as possible because of Congressional requirements and
deadlines in the United States. Honsei then asked if it
would be possible to get an explanation of the 120-day
timetable in the United States.


5. (SBU) Finally, Honsei said that the USG timetable to
initial the agreement sometime in April is too quick for the
GOJ. After the Barcelona meeting, MOFA will have to run the
agreement through the interagency process in Tokyo especially
in regards to the budget. He explained that it will be
important to get a clear commitment from MOF because of the
35-year time frame and the large investment involved with the
ITER project. ESToff asked if Honsei could offer a date by
which Tokyo could initial the agreement, but he responded
that he would need to further discuss the timing with MOFA's
treaty division. Honsei assured EST M/C that the GOJ would
do its best to find some way forward to finalize the text so
that the U.S. timetable would not need to slip. He said that
Japan would talk to the U.S. and others about this in
Barcelona.


6. (SBU) Additional Questions from the Ministry of Finance

-- Regarding USG response A: do their "legal residents" in
this context mean US nationals and permanent residents of the
United States?

-- According to USG response C, "the purpose of the tax
reimbursement agreement is to prevent double taxation." If
there is no "internal tax" system inside a certain IO whose
staff enjoy exemption of income tax, only U.S. national staff
will be levied a U.S. national income tax. In that case, we
understand that the USG will not reimburse the amount of
their national income tax levied to U.S. national staff of
the IO. Is this understanding correct?

-- If the response to the above question is yes, is another
purpose of the tax reimbursement agreement equalization
between U.S. staff and others inside the IO?

-- According to USG response D, our understanding is that the
U.S. has concluded a tax reimbursement agreement with the
IAEA. Is this correct?

-- When the United States concludes the tax reimbursement
agreement with an IO, does the U.S. government reimburse all
amounts of their national tax levied to US national staff?


7. (SBU) Action requested: Please provide responses to
Japanese MOF questions as soon as possible.
SCHIEFFER