Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06THEHAGUE417
2006-02-24 15:10:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy The Hague
Cable title:
EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY WORRIED THAT SHUTTLE PHASE-
how-toVZCZCXRO7996 RR RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHHM RUEHIK RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHPB DE RUEHTC #0417 0551510 ZNR UUUUU ZZH R 241510Z FEB 06 FM AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4924 INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE RUEHZN/ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COLLECTIVE RUEHAT/AMCONSUL AMSTERDAM 0420 RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
UNCLAS THE HAGUE 000417
SIPDIS
CODEL
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: TSPA ETTC NASA TSPL OREP NL
SUBJECT: EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY WORRIED THAT SHUTTLE PHASE-
OUT WILL LEVE THEM GROUNDED
UNCLAS THE HAGUE 000417
SIPDIS
CODEL
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: TSPA ETTC NASA TSPL OREP NL
SUBJECT: EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY WORRIED THAT SHUTTLE PHASE-
OUT WILL LEVE THEM GROUNDED
1. During a February 21 meetin with Jeff Bingham, Staff
Director for the Senat Subcommittee on Science and Space,
European Spae Research and Technology Centre (ESTEC)
representatives said there was growing concern among
European space authorities about the future of the
International Space Station (ISS). ESTEC's Head of Program
Integration, Manuel Valls Toimil, and Head of Development,
Alan Thirkettle, said the planned termination of NASA space
shuttle flights in 2010 was a particular concern for the
future of the ISS, given the key role the shuttle plays in
delivering supplies and astronauts to the station. They
also expressed anxiety that funding NASA's Vision for Space
Exploration, announced by President Bush in January 2004,
would severely limit U.S. budgetary resources for future
shuttle flights.
2. They stressed that, in ESTEC's view, the joint commitment
to the ISS was not just to build the station, but also to
operate and maintain the ISS as long as it proves useful.
Valls and Thirkettle emphasized the frustration of European
governments with delays in launching their Columbus
laboratory module to the ISS. Valls acknowledged that the
U.S. was spending much more money on ISS missions than the
Europeans, but pointed out that both the U.S. and the E.U.
had already spent roughly twice what they initially planned
to spend and that the Europeans so far have not been able to
get Columbus to the ISS, nor staff it with European
astronauts. Both felt that setting an arbitrary end date to
Shuttle flights would be counterproductive and would impair
the completion and operation of the ISS. They said that the
spirit of the commitments to the ISS was not currently being
met and that the European Space Agency would be hesitant in
the future to enter into any cooperation agreements in which
it played such a dependent role on other space agencies.
Bingham assured the ESTEC directors that the USG and NASA
intend to fulfill our commitments to the ISS.
3. Valls and Thirkettle also complained about U.S. export
control rules, specifically the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (ITAR). They said that, in addition to
hurting U.S. companies, ITAR controls were hindering
potential cooperation between U.S. and European scientists.
Valls said that the ITAR requirements and paperwork were so
onerous that ESTEC now is going out of its way not to buy
components or technology from U.S. companies.
Blakeman
SIPDIS
CODEL
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: TSPA ETTC NASA TSPL OREP NL
SUBJECT: EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY WORRIED THAT SHUTTLE PHASE-
OUT WILL LEVE THEM GROUNDED
1. During a February 21 meetin with Jeff Bingham, Staff
Director for the Senat Subcommittee on Science and Space,
European Spae Research and Technology Centre (ESTEC)
representatives said there was growing concern among
European space authorities about the future of the
International Space Station (ISS). ESTEC's Head of Program
Integration, Manuel Valls Toimil, and Head of Development,
Alan Thirkettle, said the planned termination of NASA space
shuttle flights in 2010 was a particular concern for the
future of the ISS, given the key role the shuttle plays in
delivering supplies and astronauts to the station. They
also expressed anxiety that funding NASA's Vision for Space
Exploration, announced by President Bush in January 2004,
would severely limit U.S. budgetary resources for future
shuttle flights.
2. They stressed that, in ESTEC's view, the joint commitment
to the ISS was not just to build the station, but also to
operate and maintain the ISS as long as it proves useful.
Valls and Thirkettle emphasized the frustration of European
governments with delays in launching their Columbus
laboratory module to the ISS. Valls acknowledged that the
U.S. was spending much more money on ISS missions than the
Europeans, but pointed out that both the U.S. and the E.U.
had already spent roughly twice what they initially planned
to spend and that the Europeans so far have not been able to
get Columbus to the ISS, nor staff it with European
astronauts. Both felt that setting an arbitrary end date to
Shuttle flights would be counterproductive and would impair
the completion and operation of the ISS. They said that the
spirit of the commitments to the ISS was not currently being
met and that the European Space Agency would be hesitant in
the future to enter into any cooperation agreements in which
it played such a dependent role on other space agencies.
Bingham assured the ESTEC directors that the USG and NASA
intend to fulfill our commitments to the ISS.
3. Valls and Thirkettle also complained about U.S. export
control rules, specifically the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (ITAR). They said that, in addition to
hurting U.S. companies, ITAR controls were hindering
potential cooperation between U.S. and European scientists.
Valls said that the ITAR requirements and paperwork were so
onerous that ESTEC now is going out of its way not to buy
components or technology from U.S. companies.
Blakeman