Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06THEHAGUE1894
2006-08-29 12:55:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy The Hague
Cable title:  

CHINA IPR WTO DISPUTE: DUTCH PREFER DIALOGUE AND

Tags:  ECON ETRD AORC KIPR EURM WTRO USTR CH NL 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6044
PP RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ
DE RUEHTC #1894 2411255
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 291255Z AUG 06
FM AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6662
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 1952
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY 0370
UNCLAS THE HAGUE 001894 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

USTR FOR POSNER (OGC),WINTER (CHINA),MCCOY (IPR)
STATE FOR EB/TPP/BTA (SAEGER),EB/TPP/IPE (FELSING)
STATE ALSO FOR EUR/UBI (REITER),EAP/CM (CRANE)

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD AORC KIPR EURM WTRO USTR CH NL
SUBJECT: CHINA IPR WTO DISPUTE: DUTCH PREFER DIALOGUE AND
POLITICAL PRESSURE

REF: STATE 126703

THIS MESSAGE IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE HANDLE
ACCORDINGLY.

UNCLAS THE HAGUE 001894

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

USTR FOR POSNER (OGC),WINTER (CHINA),MCCOY (IPR)
STATE FOR EB/TPP/BTA (SAEGER),EB/TPP/IPE (FELSING)
STATE ALSO FOR EUR/UBI (REITER),EAP/CM (CRANE)

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ECON ETRD AORC KIPR EURM WTRO USTR CH NL
SUBJECT: CHINA IPR WTO DISPUTE: DUTCH PREFER DIALOGUE AND
POLITICAL PRESSURE

REF: STATE 126703

THIS MESSAGE IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE HANDLE
ACCORDINGLY.


1. (U) On August 18, Econoff shared reftel points concerning
a possible USG request for WTO dispute settlement
consultations regarding aspects of China's protection of
intellectual property rights (IPR) with Dutch Ministry of
Economic Affairs (MEA),Innovation Department officials
Brigitte Spiegeler, Senior Policy Advisor on Intellectual
Property, and Angela van der Meer, Advisor. Econoff also
shared reftel points August 23 with the Dutch Ministry of
Foreign Affairs (MFA) Policy Officers Dorine Wytema,
responsible for EU External Affairs and WTO issues, and
Robert Dresen, responsible for China Affairs in the MFA's
East Asia Division.


2. (SBU) Spiegeler said the Netherlands intends to follow the
EU approach of using dialogue and "soft power," as opposed to
a formal WTO complaint process. He said Dutch Minister for
Foreign Trade Karien Van Gennip would lead a trade mission to
China in October and hold an IPR seminar aimed at improving
IPR enforcement. While van Gennip might use that forum to
"say something at an individual level," Spiegeler said the
"focus is on political pressure." The EU "is telling them,
and they are paying attention," Spiegeler noted. Van der Meer
added that "China is an important partner," and the Dutch had
concerns about China viewing a formal complaint as "China
bashing."


3. (SBU) MFA officials repeated the Dutch preference for the
EU approach and a focus on discussions. Dresen argued that
China's formulation of a national IPR strategy was a
"significant step forward." Wytema added that the September 9
EU-China summit in Helsinki would include an IPR dialogue
where these issues will be addressed.


4. (SBU) Econoff stressed the US focus on value and volume
thresholds, the importance of cooperation and standing
together, and the impact of piracy and counterfeiting on US
and EU economies. Van der Meer responded that IPR violations
are "very serious," especially in the area of medical safety.
Spiegeler agreed that Chinese infringement of IPR was a
"serious political issue," and that she would raise our
request with Minister van Gennip. The Dutch officials agreed
to share reftel points with their superiors and inform post
of any reactions and actions taken.
BLAKEMAN