Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06THEHAGUE1441
2006-06-28 12:15:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy The Hague
Cable title:
NETHERLANDS/UN: UN REFORM AND LIFTING THE BUDGET
VZCZCXRO3151 RR RUEHFL RUEHKR RUEHLA RUEHMRE DE RUEHTC #1441 1791215 ZNR UUUAA ZZH R 281215Z JUN 06 FM AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6172 INFO RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA 0571 RUEHTH/AMEMBASSY ATHENS 0272 RUEHBW/AMEMBASSY BELGRADE 0627 RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 1608 RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN 4028 RUEHSL/AMEMBASSY BRATISLAVA 0196 RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS 8940 RUEHBM/AMEMBASSY BUCHAREST 1127 RUEHUP/AMEMBASSY BUDAPEST 0166 RUEHCH/AMEMBASSY CHISINAU 0110 RUEHCP/AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN 6608 RUEHDL/AMEMBASSY DUBLIN 0213 RUEHHE/AMEMBASSY HELSINKI 1846 RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KIEV 0430 RUEHKR/AMEMBASSY KOROR 0001 RUEHLI/AMEMBASSY LISBON 0487 RUEHLJ/AMEMBASSY LJUBLJANA 0257 RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 1556 RUEHLE/AMEMBASSY LUXEMBOURG 5157 RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID 4999 RUEHNC/AMEMBASSY NICOSIA 0662 RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 5060 RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 1292 RUEHPG/AMEMBASSY PRAGUE 1103 RUEHRK/AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK 0021 RUEHRA/AMEMBASSY RIGA 0166 RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME 1971 RUEHVJ/AMEMBASSY SARAJEVO 0091 RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 1337 RUEHSQ/AMEMBASSY SKOPJE 0437 RUEHSF/AMEMBASSY SOFIA 0426 RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM 4645 RUEHTL/AMEMBASSY TALLINN 0169 RUEHSI/AMEMBASSY TBILISI 0104 RUEHTV/AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV 2852 RUEHTI/AMEMBASSY TIRANA 0492 RUEHVT/AMEMBASSY VALLETTA 0259 RUEHVI/AMEMBASSY VIENNA 0655 RUEHVL/AMEMBASSY VILNIUS 0181 RUEHWR/AMEMBASSY WARSAW 1991 RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON 0313 RUEHVB/AMEMBASSY ZAGREB 1855 RUEHLA/AMCONSUL BARCELONA 0019 RUEHFL/AMCONSUL FLORENCE 0012 RUEHMRE/AMCONSUL MARSEILLE 0355 RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 4122
UNCLAS THE HAGUE 001441
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL AORC EU EUN UNGA UNGA NL
SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/UN: UN REFORM AND LIFTING THE BUDGET
CAP
REF: STATE 105146
UNCLAS THE HAGUE 001441
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL AORC EU EUN UNGA UNGA NL
SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/UN: UN REFORM AND LIFTING THE BUDGET
CAP
REF: STATE 105146
1. (SBU) Poloff delivered demarche on UN management reform
and lifting the budget cap to Alain Ancion at the Dutch MFA's
Office of UN Management Reform Office on June 27. Per
instructions, Poloff also provided a copy of the draft
resolution for the MFA to review.
2. (SBU) Ancion was supportive of the U.S. initiative but
pessimistic that it would succeed. He said he was
disappointed some of the proposed Dutch reforms -- such as a
consolidated peace-keeping budget -- did not make it into the
draft resolution, but recognized this was probably due to
Japanese sensitivities. Ancion expected stiff resistance to
point 9 of the draft resolution, particularly from Russia.
3. (SBU) Ancion expressed surprise that some countries with a
history of working closely with Australia and Japan -- i.e.,
New Zealand and Canada -- had not participated more actively
in drafting the the resolution. He felt it was a missed
opportunity for further consultations in finding more
resolutions. Ancion conceded, however, that the draft
resolution was probably the most logical outcome of the
consultations.
4. (SBU) Finally, Ancion argued that the G-77 will remain
highly suspicious of the EU, US, and UN, and predicted the
group would take a minimalist approach while seeking a broad
negotiation of the resolution. The Dutch, on the other hand,
view the link between UN reform and the budget cap as an
ideal way to make progress in UN management reform. Getting
any resolution, he concluded, would be a good thing, but the
process will clarify the limits of what sort of reforms in UN
management can be achieved in the current environment.
BLAKEMAN
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL AORC EU EUN UNGA UNGA NL
SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/UN: UN REFORM AND LIFTING THE BUDGET
CAP
REF: STATE 105146
1. (SBU) Poloff delivered demarche on UN management reform
and lifting the budget cap to Alain Ancion at the Dutch MFA's
Office of UN Management Reform Office on June 27. Per
instructions, Poloff also provided a copy of the draft
resolution for the MFA to review.
2. (SBU) Ancion was supportive of the U.S. initiative but
pessimistic that it would succeed. He said he was
disappointed some of the proposed Dutch reforms -- such as a
consolidated peace-keeping budget -- did not make it into the
draft resolution, but recognized this was probably due to
Japanese sensitivities. Ancion expected stiff resistance to
point 9 of the draft resolution, particularly from Russia.
3. (SBU) Ancion expressed surprise that some countries with a
history of working closely with Australia and Japan -- i.e.,
New Zealand and Canada -- had not participated more actively
in drafting the the resolution. He felt it was a missed
opportunity for further consultations in finding more
resolutions. Ancion conceded, however, that the draft
resolution was probably the most logical outcome of the
consultations.
4. (SBU) Finally, Ancion argued that the G-77 will remain
highly suspicious of the EU, US, and UN, and predicted the
group would take a minimalist approach while seeking a broad
negotiation of the resolution. The Dutch, on the other hand,
view the link between UN reform and the budget cap as an
ideal way to make progress in UN management reform. Getting
any resolution, he concluded, would be a good thing, but the
process will clarify the limits of what sort of reforms in UN
management can be achieved in the current environment.
BLAKEMAN