Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06THEHAGUE1185
2006-05-24 16:08:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy The Hague
Cable title:  

NETHERLANDS/EU: DUTCH REMAIN SKEPTICAL ON

Tags:  PREL EU NL 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6375
PP RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHTC #1185/01 1441608
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 241608Z MAY 06
FM AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5827
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 THE HAGUE 001185 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/23/2016
TAGS: PREL EU NL
SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/EU: DUTCH REMAIN SKEPTICAL ON
CONSTITUTION AND ENLARGEMENT

REF: THE HAGUE 976

Classified By: Political Counselor Andrew Schofer; reasons 1.4 (b) and
(d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 THE HAGUE 001185

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/23/2016
TAGS: PREL EU NL
SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/EU: DUTCH REMAIN SKEPTICAL ON
CONSTITUTION AND ENLARGEMENT

REF: THE HAGUE 976

Classified By: Political Counselor Andrew Schofer; reasons 1.4 (b) and
(d)


1. (C) Summary: Following the May 2005 "no" vote on the EU
Constitution, the Dutch government instituted a one-year
period of reflection. The GONL last week presented to
Parliament the results of this reflection and made a
recommendation for the next year: continue to reflect. The
GONL has failed to explain the benefits of EU enlargement and
integration to the public. Dutch policy makers are likely in
the coming election year to become decreasingly receptive to
moving forward on enlargement and other potentially
contentious issues. End summary.

EU CONSTITUTION: "NO" STILL MEANS "NO"
--------------


2. (U) Nearly a year after Dutch voters rejected the EU
Constitution, the Dutch government has completed an internet
survey of popular attitudes and delivered a cabinet analysis
to Parliament. The cabinet also commissioned a major study
by a government affiliated think tank, the Scientific Council
for Governance (WRR). On May 19, Foreign Minister Ben Bot
and State Secretary Atzo Nicolai recommended to Parliament
that the one-year reflection period - to conclude this month
- be extended for another year. They made clear that the
current government would not renew debate on the
Constitution. Bot and Nicolai repeated GONL policy (reftel)
that the EU should focus on economic growth, employment,
security and energy. They urged greater EU decision making
transparency and a continued EU-wide debate on enlargement.


3. (C) Professor Wim van de Donk, Chairman of the
GONL-affiliated think tank WRR May 19 with Poloff and EUR/ERA
Director Peter Chase. WRR is drafting a report, at the
Cabinet,s request, that analyzes in more detail what went
wrong in the referendum and how best to proceed. WRR,s
research, according to van de Donk, shows that Dutch voters
rejected the EU Constitution for three reasons. First, many
Dutch voters, particularly the poor, mistakenly believed that
the EU presents no economic benefit for The Netherlands.
They saw that the Dutch were (and are) net contributors and
failed to understand the benefits of the open market.


4 (C) Second, the Dutch were concerned about a loss of
sovereignty. Popular perception was/is of a Brussels elite
making decisions over Dutch heads. The Dutch public was/is
also acutely aware that it has gone from being a founding
member - one of six - to just one small member state among
twenty-five. Again, the public, according to van de Donk,
failed to understand that the EU is not a zero-sum game.


5. (C) Finally, according to the WRR research, Prime Minister
Balkenede,s decision not to campaign strongly for the
Constitution doomed the vote. Van de Donk thought this
ironic. Balkenende, he said, avoided a forceful campaign out
of fear of a protest vote against his government. WRR,s
research, however, indicates that a strong government
campaign might have resulted in a much higher yes tally. On
immigration - another touchy issue both then and now - Van de
Donk felt that the GONL could have made a convincing case for
the benefits of immigration in an era of globalization. He
believes that the current Dutch debate has gone in the wrong
direction and that the political elite have abdicated their
responsibilities to educate the public.


6. (C) Van de Donk did not contain his criticism to
Balkenende. He feels that the entire Dutch political class
failed to do its job. His colleague, Monika Sie Dhian Ho,
added that the Dutch elite are themselves uncertain about the
future of the EU. Van de Donk agreed, noting that Dutch
history has periods in which the nation has been open to the
world, but that it likewise has periods in which it has been
closed. Offering the inter-war years (1918-1939) as an
example, he suggested that The Netherlands might now be
retreating to a more closed posture.

MFA: GOING SLOW ON ENLARGEMENT TOO
--------------


7. (C) Poloff spoke May 24 with Stefan van Wersch, MFA Head
of External Policy, European Integration Department. Van
Wersch explained that, while the GONL remains committed to
the EU vision, the Constitution is too sensitive an issue at
the moment. A renewed debate would not yield a result that
the GONL feels would be in The Netherlands, interests. Van
Wersch emphasized that The Netherlands will continue to take
an active and forceful role on EU external policy.
"Including, whether you like it or not, on WTO," he lightly
added.

THE HAGUE 00001185 002 OF 002




8. (C) On GONL support for January 2007 Romanian and
Bulgarian accession, Van Wersch gave a qualified yes. He
repeated the MFA,s view (reftel) that a delay in accession
would have negative consequences in Bulgaria. He believes
that, with a positive decision in October, formalities can
still be completed by January 2007. Surprisingly, and in
contradiction with previous statements he and other officials
have made, van Wersch said that Foreign Minister Bot had been
the first EU official to float the idea of delaying a
decision on Bulgarian accession. He explained that Bot,s
rationale was that a decision in June would have taken the
pressure off Bulgaria to complete its reforms.

COMMENT:
--------------


9. (C) Dutch parliamentary elections are scheduled for May
2007 but could come early; the formation of a new coalition
government after elections could, if history is any guide,
then take anywhere from three months to a year. This
effectively means that there will be no serious discussion of
the EU Constitution within the next 1 - 2 years. The current
CDA-led government is also clearly failing to explain the
benefits of enlargement and integration to the public --
probably a reflection of its own ambivalence and reluctance
to engage in contentious debates in an election year. As the
election campaign heats up, Dutch policies are likely to be
decreasingly receptive to movement on enlargement and
integration issues.
ARNALL