Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06TASHKENT345
2006-02-15 02:06:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tashkent
Cable title:  

UNHCR PRESSING FOR UZBEK RATIFICATION OF REFUGEE

Tags:  PREF PHUM PREL PGOV UZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7409
PP RUEHDBU
DE RUEHNT #0345/01 0460206
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 150206Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY TASHKENT
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5176
INFO RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ALMATY 7621
RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE 2150
RUEHAH/AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT 1733
RUEHEK/AMEMBASSY BISHKEK 2258
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 6544
RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL 1293
RUEHKB/AMEMBASSY BAKU 0460
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0663
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TASHKENT 000345 

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR SCA/CEN, PRM, AND DRL

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/14/16
TAGS: PREF PHUM PREL PGOV UZ
SUBJECT: UNHCR PRESSING FOR UZBEK RATIFICATION OF REFUGEE
CONVENTION

CLASSIFIED BY AMB. JON R. PURNELL, FOR REASONS 1.4 (B, D).

REF: 05 TASHKENT 602

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TASHKENT 000345

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR SCA/CEN, PRM, AND DRL

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/14/16
TAGS: PREF PHUM PREL PGOV UZ
SUBJECT: UNHCR PRESSING FOR UZBEK RATIFICATION OF REFUGEE
CONVENTION

CLASSIFIED BY AMB. JON R. PURNELL, FOR REASONS 1.4 (B, D).

REF: 05 TASHKENT 602


1. (C) Summary: UNHCR's Deputy Country Representative
asked for U.S. support in encouraging the GOU to sign the
1951 Convention on Refugees and its 1967 Protocol.
Uzbekistan is the only CIS state not to have signed the
documents. There are currently 1,816 refugees, mostly
Afghan, registered with UNHCR in Uzbekistan. In lieu of
signing the UN instruments, the GOU has so far abided by a
"gentleman's agreement" on non-refoulement. The GOU
reportedly declined to send delegates to a UNHCR refugee
law training seminar in St. Petersburg in November. It is
hard to believe that the GOU would seriously consider
signing either document now, especially as it blames UNHCR
for helping to remove Uzbek refugees from Kyrgyzstan
following May events in Andijon. End summary.


2. (C) In a meeting with poloff, UNHCR's deputy country
director, Asako Nozawa, asked that the U.S. encourage the
GOU to ratify the 1951 Convention on Refugees and 1967
Protocol on the Status of Refugees. To date, 143 states
have signed the Convention, which defines the legal status,
rights, and obligations of refugees. The 1967 Protocol
removes geographical and time limitations from the
Convention. Uzbekistan is the only former Soviet state
that has not signed the instruments. Instead, in 1999, the
GOU and UNHCR reached an unwritten "gentleman's agreement"
under which the GOU has agreed not to refoule mandated
refugees on Uzbek territory (i.e., repatriate them to a
country where they fear persecution). Nozawa added that in
2005, the UNHCR did not succeed in an effort to formalize
the agreement in writing. The GOU does not legally
recognize refugees, who are treated as illegal aliens under
Uzbek law and cannot legally hold jobs in the country. In
2000, however, the Ministry of Education agreed to provide
free primary education to refugee children. According to
Nozawa, the GOU lacks administrative structures and
legislation for determination of refugee status.



3. (C) According to UNHCR figures, 1,816 refugees are now
registered in Uzbekistan, of whom 1,808 are from
Afghanistan, seven from Azerbaijan, and one from
Turkmenistan. (Note: Most of the Afghans have been in
Uzbekistan for over ten years, and fear to return home
because of their connection to Afghanistan's former
Communist government. End note.) Nozawa said that the GOU
restricts freedom of movement for refugees, requiring them
to inform UNHCR of any travel plans. The GOU requires
UNHCR to provide the Foreign Ministry and Office for Visas
and Registration (OVIR) with a list of registered refugees.
UNHCRQs Tashkent office has registered 381 asylum seekers,
who are awaiting a determination of refugee status. The
number of asylum seekers in Uzbekistan has been on a
downward trend in recent years. (Comment: This may be
because Uzbekistan is now a less attractive destination for
asylum seekers, particularly as the situation in
Afghanistan improves and that in Uzbekistan declines. End
comment.)


4. (C) Nozawa said that over the past five years UNHCR has
participated in a working group drafting a law on
migration. Others in the group include the OSCE, Ministry
of Labor, and the Institute for Monitoring Active
Legislation, an NGO that was shut down in 2005. She said
that UNHCR strongly pushed for including provisions on
refugee rights, using language from the 1951 Convention,
but without success.


5. (C) UNHCR supports a network of six local NGO
implementing partners located in Tashkent (reftel),Termez,
Nukus, and Kokand, which provide support, training and
counseling to refugees. In 2005 UNHCR conducted training
on refugee law for GOU officials, journalists and students.
UNHCR is awaiting an EU decision on whether to fund further
training in 2006. Nozawa told poloff that the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs had declined a UNHCR invitation to send GOU
officials to an international refugee law training seminar
in St. Petersburg in November 2005. Also, Nozawa said that
the Head of the GOU's Human Rights Center, Senator Akmal
Saidov, strongly criticized UNHCR during its annual

TASHKENT 00000345 002 OF 002


Executive Committee meeting in Geneva in October 2005.
Saidov specifically denounced UNHCR's handling of the
Andijon refugees by its Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan offices.


6. (C) Nozawa told poloff that there had been disagreement
between UNHCR's Tashkent office and Geneva headquarters
over whether to monitor the Andijon trials. Tashkent-based
staff were reluctant to monitor the trials, believing it
fell outside their mandate. However UNHCR management in
Geneva insisted that its staff monitor the trial after it
became apparent that one of the defendants had been
returned from Kyrgyzstan.


7. (C) Comment: In the current environment it is impossible
to believe that the GOU would even consider signing on to
the document, much less entertain any representations from
the U.S. on the subject. The government is still smarting
from UNHCRQs role in removing Uzbek refugees from
Kyrgyzstan following the Andijon events. The irony of
asking the GOU to sign an agreement not to refoule refugees
to countries where they might face persecution is palpable
as Uzbeks in Russia, Kyrgyzstan, and Kazakhstan fight
extradition back to an uncertain future here.

PURNELL