Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06TASHKENT326
2006-02-14 01:49:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Tashkent
Cable title:  

TAJIBAYEVA - NOT A RUN-OF-THE-MILL SHOW TRIAL

Tags:  PHUM PREL PGOV PINR UZ 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO5714
PP RUEHDBU
DE RUEHNT #0326/01 0450149
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 140149Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY TASHKENT
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5160
INFO RUEHEK/AMEMBASSY BISHKEK 2253
RUEHTA/AMEMBASSY ALMATY 7616
RUEHDBU/AMEMBASSY DUSHANBE 2145
RUEHAH/AMEMBASSY ASHGABAT 1728
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TASHKENT 000326 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR SCA/CEN AND DRL

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/14/2016
TAGS: PHUM PREL PGOV PINR UZ
SUBJECT: TAJIBAYEVA - NOT A RUN-OF-THE-MILL SHOW TRIAL

CLASSIFIED BY AMB. JON R. PURNELL, FOR REASONS 1.4 (B, D).

REF: TASHKENT 261

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TASHKENT 000326

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR SCA/CEN AND DRL

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/14/2016
TAGS: PHUM PREL PGOV PINR UZ
SUBJECT: TAJIBAYEVA - NOT A RUN-OF-THE-MILL SHOW TRIAL

CLASSIFIED BY AMB. JON R. PURNELL, FOR REASONS 1.4 (B, D).

REF: TASHKENT 261


1. (C) Summary: In a dramatic departure from Uzbekistan's recent
Soviet-style show trials, human rights activist Mutabar
Tajibayeva and her attorneys are putting up a spirited defense
in her criminal trial. The judge has opened the proceedings to
outside observers: journalists, diplomats and NGO monitors have
come to watch. The attorneys tell us that the presence of
monitors has made a sharp difference in the tone of the trial.
They acknowledge it will likely not affect the verdict, though
Tajibayeva is eligible for amnesty if convicted. Also in
contrast to earlier trials, witnesses and the prosecution have
spoken of foreign journalists and human rights NGOs in a neutral
or positive light, rather than as a cabal of intriguers seeking
to overthrow the legitimate government. End summary.


2. (C) The trial of human rights activist Mutabar Tajibaeva was
opened to outside observers on February 8. Tajibayeva faces
several charges, including extortion of money from clients of
her fishing farm, polluting the environment, and attempting to
sow panic and public disorder through her human rights advocacy
(reftel). According to her lawyers, the court initially closed
the trial on the bizarre pretext that Tajibayeva's relatives
might pose a physical threat to outside observers. Neither
observers nor attorneys could explain why the court decided to
open the trial to the public in the second week of proceedings.


3. (C) The venue - a court in the rural village of Dustobod, a
90 minute drive from Tashkent - seemed deliberately chosen to
limit public access. Police blocked the town's one road and
checked identification of all who entered. A Human Rights Watch
staffer reported that, during the first week of the trial, he
and other observers were turned away by police. On February 8,
police tried to convince poloff that the trial had ended. On
February 9, however, inspections were minimal. Still, the two
dozen armed Interior Ministry troops guarding the court far

outnumbered the handful of trial observers. (Note: While mostly
for show, the security presence was sometimes intrusive. An
Uzbek national employee of the Swiss Embassy told poloff that
after attending the trial on February 8, two guards from the
court followed him back to Tashkent and tailed him for more than
two hours while he ran errands. End note.)


4. (C) Tajibayeva has pleaded not guilty to all charges and
hired three private lawyers - including her sister - who have
actively advocated her case to Western embassies and human
rights groups. Shortly before the trial began, the lawyers
reported that Tajibayeva attempted to commit suicide by slitting
her wrists. However, as observers filed into the courtroom, she
appeared healthy and cheerful, greeting visitors with smiles and
conversation. She sat alone in a cage in the cramped courtroom,
frequently studying her case notes, which were scattered around
her in folders. During testimony, she appeared animated, taking
notes and occasionally standing to contest witness' statements.
Her lawyers actively questioned the judge and prosecuting
attorneys on substance and procedure.


5. (C) On February 8 and 9, two witnesses testified. The first
was a man who claimed to have done business with Tajibayeva
buying and selling livestock. He said that he had accumulated a
business debt to Tajibayeva, who in turn demanded that he repay
her a far higher sum. The second witness, Mansur Ruziboyev,
said he was a friend of Tajibayeva who was familiar with her
human rights work. Following initial testimony and cross-
examination by the judge and prosecution, both witnesses claimed
they were ill, and the judge excused them from the court before
the defense could take its turn to cross-examine. Tajibayeva
and her lawyers responded with impassioned complaints that the
judge was violating Tajibayeva's right to defend herself. The
defense also requested more time to study the case materials.
Tajibayeva and her attorneys claimed that she has examined only
a fraction of the 5,500 pages of case documents, and that the
lawyers have not had enough time to work with her to develop a
defense strategy.


6. (C) Tajibayeva's lawyers thanked observers for appearing at
the trial. They said that when the trial was closed, it was
very one-sided, with the judge and prosecution dismissing
questions and protests from the defense team outright, and
showing callous disrespect for Tajibayeva. With observers
present, they said, the entire tone of the proceedings had
changed to be more balanced.


7. (C) One attorney noted that if Tajibayeva was found guilty,
this would be her first criminal conviction. She would,
therefore, be eligible for amnesty under a Senate resolution

TASHKENT 00000326 002 OF 002


passed in early December. If Tajibayeva had pleaded guilty, she
could have qualified prior to the trial. However, as she
pleaded not guilty, she will be eligible for amnesty only after
she is convicted. The attorney said there is little hope for
acquittal, but that Tajibayeva's prison sentence could be
reduced under the amnesty.


8. (C) In previous Andijon-related trials, state prosecutors
portrayed a plot by foreign journalists and independent human
rights groups to slander the GOU and destabilize the country.
In Tajibayeva's trial, in contrast, while human rights
activists, journalists, and "foreigners" are mentioned, it has
so far been in a neutral or positive light. For example,
witness Mansur Ruziboyev discussed meeting Marat Zakhidov, a
well-known human rights and political activist whose
organization Tajibayeva had joined, and praised Zakhidov as "a
man of vision." The printed indictment notes Tajibayeva
received a $5,620 grant from USAID, and $200 from the French
Embassy for her human rights work (reftel). Prosecutors did not
fault her for receiving the money, but only for "misusing" it.
In the trial, two of the three judges asked witness Mansur
Ruziboyev whether Tajibayeva received foreign support, but he
responded only that he had heard about a grant of roughly
$5,000, but did not know where it had come from.


9. (C) COMMENT: This is no run-of-the-mill Soviet-style show
trial. In the Supreme Court trial of Andijon terrorist suspects
in late 2005, defendants delivered prepared speeches professing
their guilt and begging for mercy, while defense attorneys
remained quiet and submissive. Tajibayeva, in contrast, has
seized on her international exposure to proclaim her innocence,
and is working in concert with her activist attorneys to use
court procedure to her own advantage. To be sure, the defendant
in an Uzbek court has no advantages, and essentially no hope for
acquittal. But this has not diminished Tajibayeva's courage or
her energy.

PURNELL