Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06TAIPEI546
2006-02-22 07:14:00
CONFIDENTIAL
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Cable title:  

TAIWAN RE-REQUESTS ASSISTANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL

Tags:  ECON IO PREL TW 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4524
OO RUEHCHI RUEHFK RUEHHM RUEHKSO RUEHPB
DE RUEHIN #0546/01 0530714
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 220714Z FEB 06
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 8636
RUEHHI/AMEMBASSY HANOI PRIORITY 3000
INFO RUEHZU/APEC COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHGZ/AMCONSUL GUANGZHOU PRIORITY 8985
RUESLE/AMCONSUL SHANGHAI PRIORITY 8382
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 000546 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/21/2031
TAGS: ECON IO PREL TW
SUBJECT: TAIWAN RE-REQUESTS ASSISTANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL
ORGANIZATIONS

Classified By: AIT Acting Director David Keegan,
Reasons: 1.4 (b/d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 000546

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/21/2031
TAGS: ECON IO PREL TW
SUBJECT: TAIWAN RE-REQUESTS ASSISTANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL
ORGANIZATIONS

Classified By: AIT Acting Director David Keegan,
Reasons: 1.4 (b/d)


1. (C) Summary: In a February 21 meeting Taiwan's Ministry
of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) appealed to AIT ADIR for U.S. help
in upgrading and systematizing the conditions for its
participation in WHO and in reinforcing with 2006 APEC host
Vietnam the importance of providing Taiwan with treatment
equivalent to that provided to any other APEC member. MOFA
also indicated that the visit of its Vice Minister to
Washington for "bilateral consultations on Taiwan's
strategies for WHO participation" would be delayed, and
briefly discussed its desire for a U.S.-Taiwan FTA and its
priorities with the EU. Action request para 4 and para 7.
End summary.

WHO
---


2. (C) MOFA Department of International Organizations
Director General John Chen discussed with AIT ADIR Keegan
Taiwan's concerns about the nature of its current
participation in WHO. Chen recognized that formal observer
status would be difficult to achieve in the near future.
Within the existing ad hoc arrangement for Taiwan's
substantive participation in WHO, Chen identified three major
problems that he requested U.S. help in addressing: First,
since Taiwan was required to apply for WHO approval prior to
every WHO meeting it wished to attend, there was often little
lead time between the approval notice and the start of the
meeting, making logistics and preparations difficult. This
was compounded by the fact that the WHO secretariat has no
process for informing Taiwan of upcoming events. Second,
Chen noted that there was a lack of transparency and
standards in the approval process, which made it difficult to
predict whether Taiwan would be allowed to attend any
particular meeting. This further compounded the difficulty
caused by the short lead time. Third, because of the ad hoc
nature of Taiwan's participation, it was sometimes left out
of actions that followed-up on the meetings.


3. (C) DG Chen acknowledged that Taiwan had participated in
12 (of 16) WHO meetings since the ad hoc formula was
developed last year, but he insisted the process needed to be
made more systematic, transparent, and with better follow-up
to the meetings. He said Taiwan was trying to make these
points with the EU and with Japan as well, although he
acknowledged ADIR's suggestion that maintaining the EU arms
embargo was a much higher priority issue in Taiwan's
relations with the EU. Chen also noted that MOFA VM Michael
Kau had postponed his plans to lead a delegation to the U.S.
to discuss Taiwan's WHO participation. He now proposes to
travel to Washington in mid-March.


4. (C) Action request: AIT requests talking points regarding
the possibility of VM Kau leading a delegation to Washington
to discuss strategies for WHO participation.

APEC
--------------


5. (C) DG Chen also expressed concern about Vietnam's
hosting APEC 2006. He said Taiwan was worried that Vietnam
would not be able to stand up to political pressure from
China and would exclude Taiwan from some APEC meetings or
otherwise limit its participation. He said MOFA's informants
said this was not related to the subject matter of the
meeting (i.e., that Taiwan should not attend meetings
touching on security issues),but was the result of China's
broader strategy of trying to restrict Taiwan's international
dealings and isolate it from other governments. Taiwan has
been told that two emissaries from Beijing had recently
conveyed a request to Hanoi to limit Taiwan's participation
in APEC. Chen said that according to MOFA's informant, Hanoi
wanted the U.S. to deliver a message on the importance of
providing equal treatment to all APEC members in order to
help it resist China's pressure. (Note: While MOFA refused to
clarify who their informant was, it was clear from the
context that it was a Vietnam government official. End note.)


6. (C) Comment: In the past year, there have been several
attempts by China to exclude Taiwan from events which do not
require statehood and to which Taiwan has been invited, such
as APEC events. AIT believes that in order to be consistent
with the U.S. policy of supporting Taiwan's participation in
international organizations that do not require statehood,
when pressure from China forces the host of an event to
exclude Taiwan, the U.S. should support relocating the event
to a neutral location where all invitees are welcome, even if

TAIPEI 00000546 002 OF 002


this means some invitees (i.e., China, Hong Kong, and Macau)
may boycott the meeting.


7. (C) Action request: AIT believes it is important for U.S.
senior officials to remind host government officials and
other APEC economies of the equality of all APEC members in
terms of rights and obligations within APEC.
KEEGAN