Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06TAIPEI1608
2006-05-10 13:35:00
CONFIDENTIAL
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Cable title:  

TAIWAN AGREES ON IHR ADHERENCE AND REQUESTS LETTER

Tags:  AMED SENV TBIO PREL TW 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO9836
PP RUEHGH
DE RUEHIN #1608/01 1301335
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 101335Z MAY 06
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0111
INFO RUEHBK/AMEMBASSY BANGKOK 3260
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 5192
RUEHJA/AMEMBASSY JAKARTA 3855
RUEHKL/AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR 3495
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 7832
RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE 6445
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 7707
RUEHGZ/AMCONSUL GUANGZHOU 9315
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 6393
RUEHGH/AMCONSUL SHANGHAI 0130
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 1744
RUEAUSA/DEPT OF HHS WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 001608 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/TC, HHS FOR ERIKA ELVANDER, GENEVA FOR DAVID
HOHMAN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/25/2010
TAGS: AMED SENV TBIO PREL TW
SUBJECT: TAIWAN AGREES ON IHR ADHERENCE AND REQUESTS LETTER
FROM HHS LEAVITT

REF: A. A. LEVY-KEEGAN EMAIL 5/9/06


B. B. TAIPEI 1536

C. C. TAIPEI 1540

Classified By: AIT DIRECTOR STEPHEN M. YOUNG for reasons 1.4 (b),(d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 001608

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

STATE FOR EAP/TC, HHS FOR ERIKA ELVANDER, GENEVA FOR DAVID
HOHMAN

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/25/2010
TAGS: AMED SENV TBIO PREL TW
SUBJECT: TAIWAN AGREES ON IHR ADHERENCE AND REQUESTS LETTER
FROM HHS LEAVITT

REF: A. A. LEVY-KEEGAN EMAIL 5/9/06


B. B. TAIPEI 1536

C. C. TAIPEI 1540

Classified By: AIT DIRECTOR STEPHEN M. YOUNG for reasons 1.4 (b),(d)


1. (C) Summary. This is an action cable see para 7. DDIR
presented demarche to VFM Michael Kau and TCDC Director Steve
Kuo 5/10 at MOFA. DDIR stressed two issues: our strong
support for Taiwan's unilateral adherence to the IHR and the
importance of Taiwan's acceptance of the 2x2 debate on the
issue of observership before the WHA General Committee and
plenary. Kau reported that he had just met with the EU reps
and they also supported a pragmatic approach. Taiwan plans to
announce IHR adherence the week of May 15 and hopes that HHS
secretary Leavitt can mention this in his letter to WHO DG

SIPDIS
Lee supporting Taiwan observership at the WHA. Kau promised
to deliver draft copies of the announcement to AIT as soon as
possible. End Summary.

AIT DEMARCHE POINTS WELL TAKEN
--------------


2. (C) AIT DDIR demarched MOFA VFM Michael Kau (Ying-Mao) at
MOFA on May 10 as agreed with Department and Geneva ref A
(demarche summarized para 3). Also present were Taiwan Center
for Disease Control (TCDC) Director Steve Kuo and Ministry of
Health Director-General Peter Chang and MOFA IO
Director-General John Chen. Kau began by saying that he had
just met with local representatives of the EU troika
(Austria, UK, Germany) and the EU Commission. They had
expressed support for a non-political approach to increase
Taiwan's participation in WHO. He said Japan had backed a
similar approach and that the Japanese ambassador in Geneva
had intervened directly with WHO DG Lee on this issue. DDIR
welcomed the progress Taiwan had made thus far on the WHO
issue and the EU and Japan's support for more meaningful
participation in the WHO.


3. (C) DDIR then reviewed ref A demarche: that HHS Secretary
Leavitt plans to write WHO DG in support of Taiwan's
observership in WHO and that we will try to arrange a meeting

between Leavitt and MOH Hou in Geneva; IHR adherence can be
announced at anytime and in the way Taiwan considers most
effective; DDIR suggested that announcing this shortly before
the start of the WHA meeting (5/22) might be most effective;
that Taiwan should write WHO about its IHR intent and that US
has encouraged WHO response to this letter. DDIR then
clarified that WHO did not confer access to Taiwan on GOARN
and that we were pursuing this issue with Beijing. He
relayed that WHO had stated that Taiwan does participate in
TEPHINET and OVL. He advised Taiwan to adopt a low-key
approach on observer status saying this will aid Taiwan's
chances to participate in GOARN. He stated that the US
supports a 2 plus 2 debate in both the General Committee and
Plenary and that this would be in Taiwan's best interests. He
urged Taiwan to move on the 2 plus 2 debate and not delay any
further, not as a favor to the U.S., but to advance its own
interests.

TAIWAN FAVORS PRAGMATIC APPROACH
--------------


4. (C) Kau responded that Taiwan favored a pragmatic and
non-political approach. He said Taiwan will announce IHR
adherence early next week and also suggested that TCDC would
be the best contact point, mentioning that the EU quartet of
Austria, UK, Germany and EU's Brian McDonald stressed the
value of expertise over official Taiwan title in identifying
the best IHR contact. DDIR welcomed an announcement next
week and agreed that TCDC Director Steve Kuo would seem to
have appropriate expert credentials to serve as a contact
point.


5. (C) Kau said that having HHS Secretary express support for
Taiwan observership in his letter would be very effective,
and that he hoped that his letter would mention Taiwan's

TAIPEI 00001608 002 OF 002


adherence to the IHR. On the 2 plus 2 debate, Kau said he
will report to President Chen as soon as he returns to Taiwan
and holds a video conference on 5/19 with local supporters of
Taiwan's WHO observer status. Kau said both he and TCDC
Director Kuo will recommend the President adopt the 2 plus 2
debate approach, adding that the proposed letter from HHS
Secretary Leavitt would go a long way in helping him convince

SIPDIS
the President.

TAIWAN SUGGESTS OTHER VENUES FOR REGIONAL PARTICIPATION
-------------- --------------


6. (C) Ministry of Health Director-General Peter Chang then
raised the issue of Taiwan's participation in regional
meetings such as the Western Pacific Regional Committee
(WPRC). He said that both Koreas participated in different
regional meetings and perhaps Taiwan could participate in the
SEARO (based in New Delhi) or even PAHO (based in Wash DC)
and thus reduce frictions with the PRC. DDIR said the idea
might be worth exploring but citing the two Koreas as a
precedent would likely not be welcome by the PRC.


7. (C) COMMENT AND ACTION REQUEST. Taiwan seems to have
adopted a more pragmatic approach than in our previous
meetings (ref. B & C) The questions raised in this meeting
had little to do with symbolic gestures and much to do with
details of advancing its WHO participation. We would welcome
any thoughts from EAP, IO or the U.S. Mission Geneva on how
best to respond to Taiwan's questions. END COMMENT

YOUNG