Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06STOCKHOLM55
2006-01-13 16:46:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Stockholm
Cable title:  

SWEDEN: MFA POLDIR ON REPORTING IRAN TO THE

Tags:  KNNP PARM PREL IR EU AORC 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1588
OO RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHSM #0055/01 0131646
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 131646Z JAN 06
FM AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 9624
INFO RUEHAR/AMEMBASSY ACCRA IMMEDIATE 0023
RUEHTH/AMEMBASSY ATHENS IMMEDIATE 0060
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING IMMEDIATE 0983
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA IMMEDIATE 0084
RUEHSL/AMEMBASSY BRATISLAVA IMMEDIATE 0088
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS IMMEDIATE 4500
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES IMMEDIATE 0031
RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO IMMEDIATE 0026
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA IMMEDIATE 0653
RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO IMMEDIATE 0060
RUEHJA/AMEMBASSY JAKARTA IMMEDIATE 0111
RUEHLI/AMEMBASSY LISBON IMMEDIATE 0148
RUEHLJ/AMEMBASSY LJUBLJANA IMMEDIATE 0169
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW IMMEDIATE 1160
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI IMMEDIATE 0093
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO IMMEDIATE 2219
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA IMMEDIATE 2119
RUEHSA/AMEMBASSY PRETORIA IMMEDIATE 0126
RUEHQT/AMEMBASSY QUITO IMMEDIATE 0058
RUEHYN/AMEMBASSY SANAA IMMEDIATE 0011
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL IMMEDIATE 0714
RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE IMMEDIATE 0379
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO IMMEDIATE 0692
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA IMMEDIATE 0047
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO BRUSSELS BE IMMEDIATE
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK IMMEDIATE 0125
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 STOCKHOLM 000055 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/13/2016
TAGS: KNNP PARM PREL IR EU AORC
SUBJECT: SWEDEN: MFA POLDIR ON REPORTING IRAN TO THE
UNITED NATIONS

REF: A. STATE 5477

B. STATE 6236

Classified By: Charge d'Affaires a.i. Stephen V. Noble, reason 1.4 (b)
and (d).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 STOCKHOLM 000055

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/13/2016
TAGS: KNNP PARM PREL IR EU AORC
SUBJECT: SWEDEN: MFA POLDIR ON REPORTING IRAN TO THE
UNITED NATIONS

REF: A. STATE 5477

B. STATE 6236

Classified By: Charge d'Affaires a.i. Stephen V. Noble, reason 1.4 (b)
and (d).


1. (c) Charge d'Affaires a.i. Noble delivered ref A
demarche January 13 to MFA Political Director Olof Skoog,
seeking Sweden's support as an IAEA Board member for a
proposed emergency meeting of the Board, with the purpose of
reporting Iran to the UNSC. Charge underscored that Iran had
been found in contravention of it nuclear safeguards
obligations in September 2005, and since then had repeatedly
ignored international efforts to find an acceptable solution
and had made numerous belligerent statements leading up to
its recent action of removing the seals at the Natanz
enrichment facility.


2. (c) Poldir Skoog said Sweden had focused its attention on
Iran and shared our concerns. Sweden took a very firm
approach to Iran. The next natural step was to react to what
Iran was doing; Sweden supported convening an extraordinary
meeting of the IAEA Board. Sweden also favored a gradual
approach, and believed it was important, as much as possible,
to build an alliance for actions concerning Iran. The P-5
countries were of course essential. In addition, India,
Brazil, and South Africa needed to be included. Sweden
believed it was in the interest of those countries, as well
in our own interests to ensure that Iran did not go down the
road of developing nuclear weapons. The potential nuclear
power states may see this as a double standard, and there is
some wariness, but Sweden strongly supports bringing them
into them on board in regard to containing Iran's ambitions.
Skoog said a strong international response, and not only from
the P-5 and nuclear powers, is the only thing that will deter
Iran.


3. (c) In regard to the role of the UNSC, Skoog urged
gradual steps. The UNSC should endorse the efforts of the
IAEA to press Iran to comply with previous IAEA Board of
Governors' resolutions. Skoog thought this would be a good
first step in pressing Iran. The Charge said he understood
the question of how the IAEA might report Iranian compliance
with a UNSC mandate was still at play.


4. (c) Skoog asked Charge if the U.S. was considering
proposing "sharper measures." The Charge referred to the
description of the gradual approach the U.S. had in mind in
the non-paper. Charge noted that Iran has applied pressure
to some of the key countries in response to their joining
IAEA consensus resolutions in the past. We should be aware
of this practice by Iran and would welcome information from
the GoS if they learn of similar tactics being applied now.
The U.S. shared the views of Sweden on the importance of
working with India, South Africa, and Brazil. Skoog noted
the success of our efforts to press Iran will depend on our
success in mobilizing the P-5, key non-aligned and others to
act in concert. The Charge said we agree and look forward to
GoS support to this end. Skoog agreed that each time we
apply pressure on Iran to comply with its outstanding
obligations, we should leave open a clearly understood path
on how it should comply.


STOCKHOLM 00000055 002 OF 002


Comment
--------------

5. (c) Sweden shares our underlying concerns and endorses an
extraordinary session of the IAEA Board. The Swedish
approach is very much oriented toward consensus-building in
recognition of the fact that we need the P-5 and key
influential non-aligned states to prevail in the IAEA Board
of Governors and the UNSC. As a nuclear-capable country that
made the decision prior to 1960 not to pursue nuclear arms,
Sweden is committed to preventing the proliferation of
nuclear arms, and sees Iran as a test case. On prior
occasions, they have told us they will follow the lead of the
EU-3 on Iran.
NOBLE