Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06SKOPJE289
2006-03-30 07:57:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Skopje
Cable title:  

MACEDONIA CHURCH DISPUTE: MOC PATRIARCH DECRIES

Tags:  PHUM PREL KIRF MK 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0007
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHSQ #0289/01 0890757
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 300757Z MAR 06
FM AMEMBASSY SKOPJE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4448
INFO RUEHTH/AMEMBASSY ATHENS 1642
RUEHBW/AMEMBASSY BELGRADE 1893
RUEHBM/AMEMBASSY BUCHAREST 1084
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 0352
RUEHSF/AMEMBASSY SOFIA 4965
RUEHTI/AMEMBASSY TIRANA 3385
RUEHIT/AMCONSUL ISTANBUL 0102
RUEHPS/USOFFICE PRISTINA 4033
RUESEN/SKOPJE BETA
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEHSQ/USDAO SKOPJE MK
RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE 2064
UNCLAS SKOPJE 000289 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EUR/SCE, DRL/IRF, AND DRL/CRA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PREL KIRF MK
SUBJECT: MACEDONIA CHURCH DISPUTE: MOC PATRIARCH DECRIES
SERBIAN "INTERFERENCE"

REF: A. 05 SKOPJE 750


B. SKOPJE 219

C. 05 SKOPJE 1150

UNCLAS SKOPJE 000289

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EUR/SCE, DRL/IRF, AND DRL/CRA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PREL KIRF MK
SUBJECT: MACEDONIA CHURCH DISPUTE: MOC PATRIARCH DECRIES
SERBIAN "INTERFERENCE"

REF: A. 05 SKOPJE 750


B. SKOPJE 219

C. 05 SKOPJE 1150


1. (SBU) Summary: The Macedonian Orthodox Church (MOC) has
reacted strongly to recent revelations that the Serbian
government funds an affiliate of the Serbian Orthodox Church
(SOC) in Macedonia, calling that support an intrusion into
Macedonia's domestic affairs. The MOC also has opposed
international community pressure to liberalize Macedonia's
law on religious groups, which has been used to deny
registration to the SOC-affiliated group. Archbishop Stefan,
the patriarch of the MOC, is pessimistic about chances to
resolve the long-running dispute between the two churches in
the short term. End Summary.

MOC OBJECTS TO SERBIAN "INTERFERENCE"
--------------


2. (SBU) The Ambassador met with Archbishop Stefan on March
16 at his request to discuss the case of Zoran Vraniskovski,
a defrocked MOC bishop now recognized by the SOC as
Archbishop Jovan of Ohrid (ref A). Archbishop Stefan said
that revelations that the Serbian government provides
subsides to Vraniskovski's Orthodox Archbishopric of Ohrid,
an eparchy of the SOC, had "further complicated" the ongoing
dispute between the two churches about the ecclesiastical
status of the MOC. He predicted that the Vraniskovski case
would remain in the spotlight despite the latter's release
from prison in early March (ref B),given that one conviction
for embezzlement was likely to be upheld on appeal and a
second embezzlement trial was currently underway (ref C).


3. (SBU) Archbishop Stefan did not repeat MOC Bishop
Timotei's criticism of the 2005 HRR for "interfering" in the
MOC's dispute with Vraniskovski's group. Echoing some media
reports, Timotei had criticized the HRR for "recognizing"
Vraniskovski and his SOC-affiliated church. In a March 24
meeting with Poloff, MOC Bishop Naum apologized for Bishop
Timotei's statement and said that Timotei was not speaking
for Archbishop Stefan or the MOC. (Note: In fact, the HRR
sidestepped the issue by referring to "Zoran Vraniskovski,
whom the Serbian Orthodox recognizes as Archbishop Jovan of
Ohrid.") Most press coverage, however, focused on the HRR's

description of the GOM's treatment of Vraniskovski as a
limitation of religious freedom, and highlighted our
conclusion that Macedonia generally respected human rights
despite shortcomings in the police and judicial system.

STATUS OF SOC-AFFILIATED RELIGIOUS GROUP IN QUESTION
-------------- --------------


4. (SBU) In response to the Ambassador's remarks on the
importance of ensuring religious freedom for believers of all
faiths in Macedonia, Archbishop Stefan defended the primacy
of the MOC. He said that other ethnic and linguistic groups
could still establish parallel Orthodox churches and serve in
their respective languages, but such churches must recognize
the ecclesiastical authority of the MOC on Macedonian
territory. He pointed to similar restrictions in Serbia and
other predominantly Orthodox countries as proof that this
principle is widely respected. "Each country much protect
its own interests," Archbishop Stefan said, asserting that
for Macedonia this entails protection of its national church.


5. (U) The State Commission on Relations with Religious
Communities is consulting with OSCE/ODIHR experts on a draft
law that will determine the status of small religious groups,
such as Vraniskovski's SOC-affiliated church. The experts
note that widespread practices in the region notwithstanding,
Macedonia is obliged by the European Convention on Human
Rights and its OSCE commitments to protect such religious
groups. In a February visit to discuss the draft law, the
experts advised the Commission to remove a clause that would
effectively prevent the SOC-aligned group from registering.
(Note: The Macedonian government, by passing an Action Plan
for European Partnership last December, has committed to

implementing OSCE recommendations on the draft law.)


6. (SBU) Backed by the MOC and other religious communities,
however, the Macedonian government has so far resisted
international experts' recommendations that Macedonian law be
changed. In an early March meeting with the DCM, Commission
President Cane Mojanoski acknowledged "tension" between
international standards and practice in predominantly
Orthodox countries, but said he was unwilling to provoke a
confrontation with the MOC on the issue. The DCM replied
that, although the legal changes required to meet
international and European standards are often difficult,
they were ultimately in Macedonia's interest as it pursues
NATO and EU membership. (Note: The Commission plans to
forward the draft law to the Justice Ministry for
consideration no later than March 30; we do not expect to see
further action on the law before this summer's parliamentary
elections.)

NO MOC-SOC COMPROMISE IN VIEW
--------------


7. (U) Despite a January proposal by Russian Patriarch Alexei
to resolve the long-running dispute between the Macedonian
and Serbian churches, there is no indication that the two
sides are seriously negotiating. In an interview with a
Macedonian daily, Alexei proposed an "autonomous" status for
the Macedonian church. That would represent a step short of
autocephaly, preserving the nominal authority of the SOC over
the Macedonian church but allowing the latter to choose its
own bishops and manage its own affairs. The MOC roundly
rejected that proposal. Archbishop Stefan told the
Ambassador on March 16 that he was not optimistic that the
MOC and SOC would reach an agreement in the short term on the
status of the Macedonian church, adding that the MOC and SOC
had only limited, informal contacts. He said he believed
mediation by the Russian or Romanian Orthodox churches could
be helpful in the long term.

COMMENT
--------------


8. (SBU) The dispute between the Macedonian and Serbian
churches is likely to remain an irritant in relations between
Skopje and Belgrade until the SOC-affiliated group's
inability to register, the legal troubles of that group's
leader, and the disputed claims of SOC authority over the MOC
are resolved. In our discussions with Macedonian government
officials, we will continue to emphasize the importance of
protecting the SOC's right to organize and lead its adherents
in Macedonia. At the same time, we will stress that no
Orthodox church should use religious freedom guarantees as a
pretext for attacking the legitimacy of another.
MILOVANOVIC