Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06SEOUL1475
2006-05-02 08:39:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Seoul
Cable title:  

JAPANESE AMBASSADOR ON LIANCOURT ROCKS

Tags:  PREL PGOV JP KS 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0005
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHUL #1475/01 1220839
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 020839Z MAY 06
FM AMEMBASSY SEOUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7681
INFO RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 0662
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 0584
RHMFISS/COMUSKOREA SCJS SEOUL KOR PRIORITY
RHMFISS/COMUSKOREA J5 SEOUL KOR PRIORITY
RHMFISS/COMUSKOREA J2 SEOUL KOR PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SEOUL 001475 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/02/2016
TAGS: PREL PGOV JP KS
SUBJECT: JAPANESE AMBASSADOR ON LIANCOURT ROCKS


Classified By: Ambassador Alexander Vershbow. Reasons 1.4 (B/D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SEOUL 001475

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/02/2016
TAGS: PREL PGOV JP KS
SUBJECT: JAPANESE AMBASSADOR ON LIANCOURT ROCKS


Classified By: Ambassador Alexander Vershbow. Reasons 1.4 (B/D)


1. (c) Summary: In a May 2 luncheon meeting with the
Ambassador, Japanese Ambassador Shotaro Oshima said that
Tokyo wanted a quiet, diplomatic resolution to the Liancourt
Rocks (Dokdo/Takeshima) dispute. One encouraging sign was
that FM Ban Ki-moon was positively inclined to meet with
Japanese FM Aso on the margins of the Asian Cooperation
Dialogue in Doha later this month, and had taken a low-key
approach with visiting VFM Shiozaki. Still, Oshima assessed,
these diplomatic efforts might not be enough, because if
South Korea dispatched survey vessels to the disputed EEZ in
July, as already announced, Japan would have to react just as
strongly as the South Koreans had done in the recent
standoff. The Ambassador said that Washington had been
pleased that diplomatic efforts were successful in avoiding a
direct confrontation. The United States was not taking a
position on the territorial dispute, but wanted to see a
conflict avoided. Perhaps, the upcoming EEZ talks could
further defuse the tensions, the Ambassador said. End
Summary.

Liancourt Rocks: Not a History Issue
--------------


2. (c) On May 2, Japanese Ambassador to the ROK Shotaro
Oshima briefed the Ambassador on the recent developments over
the Liancourt Rocks dispute. The territorial dispute was
entirely separate from the so-called history issues, Oshima
said, because for centuries, Japan had control over the
islets, certainly well before the Japanese occupation of
Korea. Japan had just as valid claims as Korea and it was
misleading for President Roh to associate the islets with
Japanese occuation and colonization of the Korean Peninsula,
according to Oshima.

Quiet Diplomacy Needed
--------------


3. (c) Oshima said that diplomatic efforts had produced a
temporary solution. This was not easy. In fact, VFM Yachi,
who had made the agreement ten days ago with ROK VFM Yu
Myung-hwan, had all but admitted failure. However, after
talking one last time with Cabinet Minister Abe (not FM Aso),
Yachi was able to close the deal. Senior VFM Shiozaki, still
in town, was also able to make further progress. His meeting
with FM Ban had been a surprisingly quiet affair, with both
sides stating their position dispassionately. Shiozaki and
Ban agreed that the two nations should continue their
diplomatic efforts; Ban agreed in principle to meet with
Japanses FM Aso later in the month in Doha. For this meeting
to materialize, both sides must tone down the rhetoric,
Oshima said.


4. (c) A big concern for the GOJ was the ROK's proposal to
survey the disputed EEZ in July, Oshima said. The ROK side
understood fully that Japan must react just as strongly as
the Korean side had done to the proposed Japanese survey.
For this reason, the ROKG interlocutors have told their
Japanese counterparts not to take a position publicly on the
Korean survey vessels, because to do so would only rile the
Korean public, giving the ROKG no choice but to send the
vessels. Oshima was pleased that ROK VFM Yu had skillfully
sidestepped this question when it recently was posed by a
journalist.


5. (c) The Ambassador said that Washington had been pleased
to see that the diplomatic efforts of VFMs Yachi and Yu had
managed to avoid a confrontation between our two allies. The
United States did not take sides in the territorial dispute,
but very much wanted to see continued diplomatic efforts
toward a peaceful resolution; perhaps the proposed EEZ talks
could provide such a venue, with a view to arriving at a
compromise solution on each country's EEZ without prejudice
to either side's legal position on the islets dispute.


6. (c) Oshima said that theoretically the EEZ issue could be
separated from the territorial dispute over the Liancourt
Rocks. Such a separation had been made in the dispute over
fishing rights, allowing the two sides to reach an agreement
in 1998. However, practically, as EEZ lines were drawn from
claimed territories, such a separation would be hard, Oshima
assessed. This was because the ROK EEZ, while drawn from
Ulleungdo, encompassed Dokdo, and the Japanese could not
accept an EEZ that did not include Takeshima.


7. (c) COMMENT: There is, of course, no way that either
Tokyo or Seoul can give up claims over the islets. The
challenge, therefore, is for both parties to find a modus
vivendi that enables them to put up and live with an
unresolved issue. This is proving to be increasingly
difficult, especially given the heightened media interest,
not to mention the underlying posturing associated with
growing nationalist sentiments on both sides of the sea.
Oshima is right to be pessimistic, because it is only a
matter of time until the next flare-up, which could be as
early as July.END COMMENT.
VERSHBOW