Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06SAOPAULO1197
2006-11-16 17:52:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Consulate Sao Paulo
Cable title:  

AUSTR EISSENSTAT VISIT TO SAO PAULO

Tags:  KIPR ETRD ECON EINV KJUS BR 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1286
RR RUEHRG
DE RUEHSO #1197/01 3201752
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 161752Z NOV 06
FM AMCONSUL SAO PAULO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6061
INFO RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 7132
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 2620
RUEHMN/AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO 2207
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES 2531
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 1912
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ 3116
RUEHPE/AMEMBASSY LIMA 1070
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 0410
RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA 1454
RUEHRG/AMCONSUL RECIFE 3228
RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO 7596
RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION 2842
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 SAO PAULO 001197 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR WHA/BSC AND EB/TPP/IPE
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR SCRONIN/MSULLIVAN
STATE PASS EXIMBANK
STATE PASS OPIC FOR MORONESE, RIVERA, MERVENNE
NSC FOR FEARS
USDOC FOR 4332/ITA/MAC/OLAC
USDOC FOR 3134/USFCS/OIO
USDOC ALSO PASS PTO/OLIA
TREASURY FOR OASIA, DAS LEE AND JHOEK
DOL FOR ILAB MMITTELHAUSER

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KIPR ETRD ECON EINV KJUS BR
SUBJECT: AUSTR EISSENSTAT VISIT TO SAO PAULO

REF: A) SAO PAULO 675, B) BRASILIA 2314

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED; PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 SAO PAULO 001197

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR WHA/BSC AND EB/TPP/IPE
STATE PASS TO USTR FOR SCRONIN/MSULLIVAN
STATE PASS EXIMBANK
STATE PASS OPIC FOR MORONESE, RIVERA, MERVENNE
NSC FOR FEARS
USDOC FOR 4332/ITA/MAC/OLAC
USDOC FOR 3134/USFCS/OIO
USDOC ALSO PASS PTO/OLIA
TREASURY FOR OASIA, DAS LEE AND JHOEK
DOL FOR ILAB MMITTELHAUSER

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KIPR ETRD ECON EINV KJUS BR
SUBJECT: AUSTR EISSENSTAT VISIT TO SAO PAULO

REF: A) SAO PAULO 675, B) BRASILIA 2314

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED; PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY


1. (SBU) Summary. Following their attendance at the Bilateral
Consultative Mechanism Meeting in Brasilia on October 16 (Reftel B),
AUSTR for Latin America Everett Eissenstat, AUSTR for Industry
Meredith Broadbent, and USTR Brazil and Southern Cone Director Sue
Cronin visited Sao Paulo. They met with the Sao Paulo State
Federation of Industries (FIESP) and the American Chamber of
Commerce (Amcham) to discuss trade issues, and with private sector
representatives in the copyright and pharmaceutical areas to discuss
intellectual property rights (IPR) issues. FIESP and Amcham urged
the U.S. to maintain Brazil's participation in the Generalized
System of Preferences (GSP) program and discussed the outlook for
the Doha Round trade negotiations and ongoing bilateral regional
trade negotiations in the Americas. The USTR officials were
interviewed by prominent news, business and economic publications,
and received balanced press coverage on GSP issues in four articles
the following day. End Summary.

Amcham: Focus on Improving the Business Climate



2. (SBU) The USTR visitors had a productive exchange of information
with members of Amcham's Executive Board, which has focused on
improvement of Brazil's business environment as a priority. Amcham
is targeting six major areas: 1) regulatory framework and
infrastructure; (2) innovation and intellectual property protection;
(3) taxation; (4) job creation; (5) international negotiations; and
(6) education. Amcham members repeatedly expressed the desire to
maintain a good bilateral trade relationship with the U.S.,
concentrating on common trade interests and promoting "win/win"
situations for both countries. Although complicated, cooperation on
ethanol and the bilateral Commercial Dialogue are two areas that

have shown movement in the right direction. According to Amcham,
problems hindering movement in the bilateral economic relationship
include: (1) the lack of a consistent Brazilian foreign policy
(although according to Board Members, Finance Minister Mantega is
providing positive direction); (2) the perception that alignment
with the U.S. is unpopular with the Brazilian public, especially
given the unpopularity in Brazil of the current U.S. administration,
Lula's leftist background, and the priority he gives to promoting
South-South ties; and, (3) concern that the sudden termination of
the GSP program will negatively impact mostly U.S. companies based
in Brazil and Brazilian companies that are producing items that
would not ordinarily be produced in the U.S.

Amcham's Concern Over Losing GSP Benefits



3. (SBU) Amcham views itself as a facilitator in the bilateral
relationship, for example hosting a lunch meeting during the June
visit of Secretary of Commerce Gutierrez. Amcham voiced concern,
however, over the possible non-renewal of GSP for Brazil and the
negative impact such a decision would have on the present U.S. -
Brazil relationship. Amcham has recently advocated for the
continuation of GSP benefits for Brazil and the reduction of U.S.
import tariffs on ethanol. In October, Amcham headed a delegation
to meet with members of the U.S. Congress to support GSP renewal and
sent a second delegation November 13 - 15, prior to GSP expiration
on December 31, 2006.


4. (SBU) Brazilians appear to be shocked at the abruptness of a
possible GSP termination. A representative from 3M gave as an
example the manufacture of ear plugs. GSP benefits enable 3M to

SAO PAULO 00001197 002 OF 004


export them to the U.S. from Brazil at a competitive price; however,
removal of the benefits would create a ripple effect making the
production and export of this product unprofitable. Eaton Truck
Components offered a similar example. The company produces gear
boxes in a smaller volume than could be profitably produced in the
U.S. If GSP benefits are discontinued, the company might in the
future move production to China's cheaper labor market. The major
issue expressed by Eaton, however, was the suddenness of GSP removal
- if it were to happen - and the fear of the negative impact of such
a decision on Brazil-U.S. bilateral relations. A more palatable
decision, in the company's view, would be the gradual phasing out of
the GSP program.


5. (SBU) In response, AUSTR Broadbent explained in detail the
original intent and purpose of the GSP program and the current
review process. She underscored that the entire program is under
review, not just Brazil's participation. USTR will make a
recommendation, which will go to Congress for approval. She noted
the strong Brazilian response in favor of continuing GSP, with
approximately 800 letters sent to USTR. AUSTR Eissenstat followed
with an overview of the U.S. trade agenda in the hemisphere,
discussing the current status of NAFTA, the Chile Free Trade
Agreement (FTA),CAFTA-DR, Colombia, Panama, Uruguay, and Peru. He
then gave his impressions of the five hour meeting in Brasilia the
previous day with Rodrigo Azevedo, the Director of Monetary Policy,
Brazilian Central Bank. Sue Cronin closed the conversation with a
short discussion of Mercosul, giving an explanation of the more
comprehensive US perspective on trade with this organization.

FIESP: Econ/Pol Outlook, Stalled Doha Round, GSP Worries



6. (SBU) During an afternoon lunch meeting at FIESP, the USTR
visitors met with Deputy Director for International Affairs, Carlos
Cavalcanti, former Brazilian Ambassador to the US (and FIESP
advisor) Rubens Barbosa, International Negotiations Coordinator
Diego Bonomo, and staff members. Cavalcanti opened the meeting with
his impressions of the economic and political outlook. He thinks
that Celso Amorim will continue as the Foreign Minister, as he has
unfinished business with the WTO Doha Round. In matters of trade,
he believes the likelihood of meaningful official dialogue between
the GoB and the USG is limited, given the official stance of the
Lula government. The only alternative is for the private sector to
facilitate business, concentrating on more exports and investments,
in the hope that trade can be separated from foreign policy. Trade
will have to continue to be conducted under the present regulations,
as most changes contemplated would require amending the
Constitution, which would be very difficult under a second Lula
administration. If there is no legislative movement on trade
issues, then FIESP is prepared and committed to move forward on its
own.


7. (SBU) One of FIESP's biggest concerns is what it feels is the
misperception of Brazil's role in the Doha Round, especially among
members of the U.S. Congress. Cavalcanti clearly felt this during
his visit to Washington in conjunction with the Amcham-led
delegation to discuss GSP renewal. (Comment: In private
conversations with various members of the delegation after their
trip, most related that Brazil's role in the Doha Round negotiations
was consistently brought up as a major point of contention in
considering GSP renewal for Brazil. One FIESP participant related
that several of the congressional offices approached did not have
any substantive discussions with the delegation, but instead
referred them to Senator Grassley's office. A CIESP (Sao Paulo
State Industrial Center) representative said there was minimum
reception at congressional offices and few meetings with actual

SAO PAULO 00001197 003 OF 004


Congressmen, leaving a less than positive perception of the
delegation's treatment while in the U.S. End Comment.)


8. (SBU) During the discussion, AUSTR Broadbent stressed the need
for Brazil to differentiate itself from India, especially with
regard to non-agricultural market access (NAMA) issues. AUSTR
Eissenstat made similar comments concerning the Doha G-20 proposal,
where both India and Brazil's name appear on the proposal. In
differentiating between Brazil and India, he suggested that it would
be advisable for Brazil to bring a measurable offer to the table.
FIESP was concerned that if GSP is not renewed, it would be seen as
a "punishment" of Brazil, resulting in an official GOB response that
would only exacerbate the negative perception of the U.S. This
scenario, according to Cavalcanti, would be a "lose/lose" situation
for both Brazil and the U.S. All three USTR officials stressed that
the GSP program was never conceived as a permanent program, but
rather as a temporary program with a stated end date. Previous end
dates received a similar review, and the program was renewed. The
ongoing program renewal review is administrative, objective and
transparent, and is not solely a review of Brazil's participation,
but a review of the entire program. Thus, Brazil can best serve its
own interests by continuing to dialogue with Congress and by
offering viable, logical, and clearly understood arguments for GSP
renewal, all the while keeping in mind that the program is not
permanent, and its goal is to stimulate the development of
competitive companies that eventually do not rely on GSP benefits.


IPR: Movie Industry Satisfied, but Book Publishers Frustrated



9. (U) The USTR officials also held meetings with representatives
of the various copyright industry associations. Steve Solot, Senior
Vice President for the Motion Picture Association (MPA) in the Latin
American region, is relatively happy with the GOB's recent
activities to combat piracy and IPR crime in Brazil. At the MPA
Annual Meeting this year, the head of the Brazilian National Council
to Combat Piracy and Intellectual Property Crimes (CNCP) will be
honored with the Association's first annual anti-piracy award in
recognition of the Council's recent efforts to fight piracy. Dalton
Morato, Legal and Administrative Director for the Brazilian
Association for Reproduction Rights (ABDR),which represents 90% of
the publishers in Brazil, was very concerned with the actions of
three major universities in Sao Paulo State, which allow 100%
reproduction of foreign textbooks at their copy centers on campus.
These are the University of Sao Paulo (USP),the Getulio Vargas
Foundation (FGV - a major business school),and the Catholic
University of Sao Paulo (PUC-SP). This accounts for an annual loss
to publishers of approximately USD 15 million. ABDR has appealed to
the Ministry of Education, which has ignored the appeals, stating
that they cannot do anything since the universities are private.
The CNCP has been unable to do anything either, as they have no
control over university policies. There has been some action on
enforcement against this practice at the state level; however,
police consider book-related crimes to be of lesser importance and
of lower priority, and react accordingly.

Pharmaceutical Industry: Problems with Patents and Piracy



10. (U) The pharmaceutical industry was represented by Gaetano
Crupi, President of Eli Lilly; Joao Sanchez, Governmental Relations
Director for Merck Sharp & Dohme; Walban Damasceno Souza, Director
of Governmental Relations at Bristol Myers Squibb; and, Ronaldo
Pires, IPR Specialist for Interfarma. General discussion focused on
the need for continued improvements with ANVISA, the regulatory

SAO PAULO 00001197 004 OF 004


agency responsible for pharmaceutical patents. The patent system
now protects the investment and investor, and new examiners were
hired recently, but there is still a backlog. All agreed that
private companies are not investing enough to combat piracy and that
the piracy issue is a cultural one as well, as the predominant
Brazilian attitude does not yet consider piracy a crime and an
economic drain on society. In the area of research, there are
currently 43 biotech parks in Brazil and 23 incubators of companies.
With regard to AIDS medications, the companies believe that Brazil
is using the compulsory licensing issue to advance its reputation,
gain support from the developing world and play a leadership role.
All agreed that compulsory licensing should not be government
policy.


11. (U) This cable was cleared with USTR and Embassy Brasilia.