Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06ROME2724
2006-09-27 17:23:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Rome
Cable title:  

PASSENGER DATA SHARING VIEWS AS OLD AGREEMENT

Tags:  ASEC EAIR PTER AORC ICAO KTIA IT 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO2211
PP RUEHAG
DE RUEHRO #2724/01 2701723
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 271723Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY ROME
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6080
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 0839
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID PRIORITY 1746
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 1723
RUEAHLC/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/TSA HQ WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ROME 002724 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

USEU BRUSSELS FOR MORENSKI AND NUTTER

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/27/2016
TAGS: ASEC EAIR PTER AORC ICAO KTIA IT
SUBJECT: PASSENGER DATA SHARING VIEWS AS OLD AGREEMENT
EXPIRES

REF: STATE 132268

Classified By: ECMIN T. DELARE AS PER E.O. 12958 FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AN
D (D).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ROME 002724

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

USEU BRUSSELS FOR MORENSKI AND NUTTER

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/27/2016
TAGS: ASEC EAIR PTER AORC ICAO KTIA IT
SUBJECT: PASSENGER DATA SHARING VIEWS AS OLD AGREEMENT
EXPIRES

REF: STATE 132268

Classified By: ECMIN T. DELARE AS PER E.O. 12958 FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AN
D (D).


1. (C) SUMMARY: Italy,s privacy authority reports EU member
state privacy authorities are working toward a new U.S.-EU
agreement on Passenger Name Records (PNR) to replace the
current one expiring September 30. The new agreement
reportedly will not differ in substance from the existing
agreement. If the new agreement is not in place October 1,
EU member states reportedly will continue to permit the
airlines to transmit data as they do now to the USG. END
SUMMARY.

MEETING WITH ITALIAN DATA PROTECTION AGENCY
--------------


2. (SBU) Econ Counselor met September 11 with Giovanni
Buttarelli, Secretary General of Garante per la Protezione
dei Dati Personali (GPDP),the Italian data protection
agency. Econ Counselor observed that with the ongoing threat
to trans-Atlantic and other air travel, the Government of
Italy (GOI) surely shares USG concerns to keep civilian air
travel safe. In that regard, she noted that the current
U.S.-EU agreement authorizing transfer/sharing of passenger
name records (PNR) would expire September 30. She asked
Buttarelli for GPDP,s views on the likelihood of a new
agreement being in place October 1.


3. (C) Buttarelli said he and representatives of other EU
data protection agencies (DPAs) had been in close contact and
that their common goal was for an agreement to be in place
October 1. To meet this tight deadline, EU member states had
decided not to renegotiate or revise the content of the
current agreement, even though there were some aspects of it
that member states would like to change in future
renegotiations. In addition, the consensus among EU privacy
authorities was that any new PNR agreement needed to contain
the same level of privacy guarantees (for protection of
individual privacy data) as the current agreement.



4. (C) EU DPAs were also concerned about the formal legal
modalities of the agreement. Questions include the need for
EU parliamentary and/or EU Court of Justice involvement, and
the nature of the agreement as either self-executing
(approvable on the EU Commission level, with no need to refer
to member states),or requiring member state review.


5. (C) If member state review is required, Buttarelli
clarified that in Italy the GPDP, rather than the Italian
Parliament or Council of Ministers, would take the decision
to approve, or not.


6. (C) Econ Counselor welcomed Buttarelli,s pragmatic
approach but wondered what would happen practically speaking
on October 1, should Italy not have legal means for air
carriers to provide PNR data to the USG. Buttarelli avoided
an ironclad assurance, but said the GOI would allow the
airlines to continue data transfer to the USG, under the
terms and conditions of the current agreement, until such
time as a new agreement was in place.

EU DISSATISFACTION WITH CURRENT AGREEMENT
--------------


7. (C) Buttarelli mentioned several times that Italy and
other EU member states continue to be dissatisfied with the
current U.S.-EU PNR agreement. He cited, in particular, the
question of proportionality and a reported addendum
concerning the provision of medical data (regarding avian
influenza infection) to USG authorities. He stated that
Italy would pursue these and other substantive points in the
2007 review/renewal of the current agreement.

DHS PNR WORKSHOP
--------------


8. (U) Buttarelli also brought up DHS,s invitation to attend
a workshop in Washington, DC on PNR, passports, and biometric
identification November 26-28. Embassy offered to set
appointments for Butarelli on PNR at the margins of the

ROME 00002724 002 OF 002


workshop.

COMMENT
--------------


9. (C) Some EU observers consider Italy,s privacy authority
as the intellectual center of EU privacy policy. Buttarelli
is well and favorably known to the Embassy for his policy
grasp and candid assessments of EU privacy policy direction
over the recent past. We believe part of his good will
derives from our awarding him an IVP grant in the
mid-nineties, which gave him the opportunity to observe how
the USG protects privacy data. We suggest Washington
agencies might also consider this approach with other
influential member state experts, especially in the run-up to
the 2007 review of the substance of the current U.S.-EU
agreement. END COMMENT.

LATE NOTE
--------------


10. (C) Given the imminence of the September 30 expiry of the
current U.S.-EU agreement, Emboff called Buttarelli September
27 for an up-date. Buttarelli, just returned from
discussions in Brussels, expected EU consensus September 28
on &a temporary solution until 2007.8 Depending on the
agreement,s final form, Buttarelli &could not exclude
confusion8 in individual member states. (One possible point
of confusion he identified was whether the agreement would be
self-executing, or not.) However, he said specifically he
did not think &there would be any blocks8 to sharing data.
END LATE NOTE.
SPOGLI