Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06PORTOFSPAIN868
2006-07-24 11:43:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Port Of Spain
Cable title:  

T&T CHIEF JUSTICE CASE: SYSTEM STRONG BUT TIED UP

Tags:  PGOV KJUS KCOR TD 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0002
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHSP #0868/01 2051143
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 241143Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY PORT OF SPAIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7135
INFO RUCNCOM/EC CARICOM COLLECTIVE
C O N F I D E N T I A L PORT OF SPAIN 000868 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR WHA/CAR

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/20/2016
TAGS: PGOV KJUS KCOR TD
SUBJECT: T&T CHIEF JUSTICE CASE: SYSTEM STRONG BUT TIED UP
IN KNOTS

REF: A. PORT OF SPAIN 00615


B. PORT OF SPAIN 00736

Classified By: Charge d'affaires, Eugene P. Sweeney for reasons 1.4 (b/
d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L PORT OF SPAIN 000868

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR WHA/CAR

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/20/2016
TAGS: PGOV KJUS KCOR TD
SUBJECT: T&T CHIEF JUSTICE CASE: SYSTEM STRONG BUT TIED UP
IN KNOTS

REF: A. PORT OF SPAIN 00615


B. PORT OF SPAIN 00736

Classified By: Charge d'affaires, Eugene P. Sweeney for reasons 1.4 (b/
d)


1. (U) Political and legal drama continues to swirl around
Trinidad and Tobago's Chief Justice, Satnarine Sharma. The
recent investigation into allegations that Sharma influenced
the decision in the corruption case against former Prime
Minister and Leader of the Opposition, Basdeo Panday (ref A),
came to a head on July 14 when police officers went to his
home in an attempt to arrest Sharma based on the charge of
attempting to pervert the course of justice brought as a
result of the investigation. Sharma and his team of top
lawyers amended an existing injunction against the primary
investigator to eventually include all officers of the police
force, up to Commissioner of Police Trevor Paul. Such a move
is unprecedented in T&T, which has caused furor in the media.


2. (U) According to section 14 of the T&T Constitution, a
person may file for an injunction if his or her rights "have
been, are being or are likely to be" infringed. Sharma,
being the highest legal expert in the land, used this article
as the basis his filing. Further, according to former United
National Congress Attorney General Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj,
Sharma was also guided by previous Privy Council decisions
that indicate abuse of process to bring someone to justice
nullifies the case. Sharma argues that Article 137 of the
Constitution provides a specific mechanism by which a Chief
Justice may be impeached, and that by pursuing a criminal
case the Government is abusing the process. Justice Judith
Jones, who granted the much-amended injunction, explained her
decision in these terms in a public statement that also
called for restraint on all sides and in the press to avoid
further escalating the situation.


3. (C) State's Council, Israel Khan, revealed that since
Sharma has been charged with perverting the course of
justice, a criminal act, the state elected to use the more
direct method of a police warrant, rather than Section 137.
Khan explained, "If a Chief Justice is charged with murder,

you don't wait to convene a tribunal to remove him, then to
press charges." Essentially, the state has both options open
to it in this case, as the Constitution does not specifically
preclude a criminal case against a Chief Justice. Further,
Khan noted that Sharma would not necessarily be suspended or
removed from office upon being charged or incarcerated, but
that the President would have the option to remove the Chief
Justice. (COMMENT: Interestingly, President Richards has
remained silent throughout the entire situation, possibly
because of torn loyalties. Still, his inaction has
disappointed some since he could provide a way out of an
increasingly sticky situation. END COMMENT.)


4. (U) Attorney General John Jeremie took to the television
on July 17 to explain the Government's actions to the public.
In his statement, Jeremie alleged that the Chief Justice had
put himself above the law through these injunctions.
Further, Jeremie raised the specter of the legal system
collapsing because the Chief Justice could defend himself in
a court that he himself oversees. Jeremie nearly conceded
defeat by noting that the Government cannot move forward with
the case until the courts hear all of Sharma's applications
and the legal knots are worked out. Prime Minister Manning
has postponed a trip to Africa to monitor developments and to
consult with the Cabinet as necessary.


5. (C) According to Maharaj, the Law Association (a body of
lawyers and judges) has called an emergency meeting for July
20, at which they will consider bringing contempt charges
against Jeremie for prejudging a politically charged issue
that is before the courts. In fact, Khan has postponed
vacation to attend the meeting, suspecting that Maharaj and
other Opposition figures will use the meeting to score
political points.


6. (C) COMMENT: This may be a "Marbury vs. Madison" moment
for T&T. On one side, espoused by the Opposition, Sharma is
standing up for the independence of the Judiciary and the
inviolability of the procedures enshrined in the
Constitution. On the other, the Chief Justice has been
charged with a serious crime and should be made to answer; he
has simply used his legal privilege to prevent the normal
course of justice. In either case, the case is being played
out legally and politically, rather than on the streets with
weapons. Public opinion is solidifying largely along
political/ethnic lines, with Indo-Trinis giving the Chief
Justice the benefit of the doubt and Afro-Trinis giving the
Government the benefit of the doubt. Interestingly, neither

the Government nor the Opposition has mounted an effective
public relations campaign in order to court the all-important
swing voters, though the AG's televised address was certainly
a step in this direction. Post will continue to follow
closely what we expect to be a long, drawn out contest. END
COMMENT.

SWEENEY