Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06PARAMARIBO449
2006-07-18 19:51:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Paramaribo
Cable title:  

MEDIA VIEW - SURINAME FACES ITS TROUBLED PAST

Tags:  PHUM PGOV PREL OAS NS 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO2497
RR RUEHGR
DE RUEHPO #0449/01 1991951
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 181951Z JUL 06 ZDS
FM AMEMBASSY PARAMARIBO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8534
INFO RUCNCOM/EC CARICOM COLLECTIVE
RUEHAO/AMCONSUL CURACAO 1065
RUEHTC/AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE 1563
RUEAHQA/OSAF WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PARAMARIBO 000449 

SIPDIS

C O R R E C T E D C O P Y ADDING SLUG LINE

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR WHA/CAR - LLUFTIG

DEPT FOR WHA/OAS - JMAISTO

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PGOV PREL OAS NS
SUBJECT: MEDIA VIEW - SURINAME FACES ITS TROUBLED PAST


PARAMARIBO 00000449 001.4 OF 002


REFTEL: 05 PARAMARIBO 000575
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 PARAMARIBO 000449

SIPDIS

C O R R E C T E D C O P Y ADDING SLUG LINE

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR WHA/CAR - LLUFTIG

DEPT FOR WHA/OAS - JMAISTO

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PHUM PGOV PREL OAS NS
SUBJECT: MEDIA VIEW - SURINAME FACES ITS TROUBLED PAST


PARAMARIBO 00000449 001.4 OF 002


REFTEL: 05 PARAMARIBO 000575

1) (U) SUMMARY: The following editorial comments on
Suriname's progress in coming to terms with its troubled
period of military dictatorship in the 1980s. The editorial
appeared in Dagblad Suriname, a local daily with a
circulation of 13,000, the day before President Venetiaan
was to preside over a ceremony marking his government's
compliance with a 2005 Inter-American Court on Human Rights
ruling against the Government of Suriname. (See reftel) The
judgment resulted from a case brought by a local human
rights group, "Moiwana 86," formed in 1987 to seek justice
for the gross and systematic human rights violations during
the period of military rule, after successive Surinamese
governments failed to respond to their requests to
investigate and prosecute. The group took its name from a
1986 incident from Suriname's interior wars, when a national
army unit massacred at least 39 residents of the N'Djuka
village of Moiwana, located about 75 kilometers to the east
of Paramaribo. It discusses the political sensitivities of
dealing with a dark incident from Suriname's history, as the
key figures from the opposing sides of the 1980s interior
wars, Desi Bouterse and Ronnie Brunswijk, sit as political
leaders in today's parliament. In congratulating the GOS
for so doing, it enjoins it to move forward next with the
December murders trial against among others Bouterse. END
SUMMARY

2) (U) BEGIN TEXT OF EDITORIAL

Apologizing Publicly is No Humiliation

It is to the credit of this Government to execute the
judgment of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of June
15, 2005. The Government is working on executing the various
parts of the judgment, but already there have been
complaints about the slow pace at which the Government is
moving. The Court found Suriname in violation of six
articles of the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights;
this puts Suriname in a bad light, but also reflects badly
on the Surinamese people. It is a good thing that human
rights violations are condemned in the world of today.


The Court's judgment costs our country millions of dollars
(an estimated 5 million USD),money that we could have used
for the development of Suriname. Besides the public apology
to the community of the N'Djuka village, the State was
ordered to pay a total amount of US$ 1,690,000 to the
victims; the 130 survivors will receive compensation for
material and moral damages. A fund of US$ 1.2 million has to
be established for community development of the N'Djuka
village. The Government also has to investigate the massacre
and prosecute the responsible persons.

What is very strange about this situation is that those
responsible or at least those with a main role in the
massacre are currently members of the Parliament. Two main
figures: Brunswijk and Bouterse are very popular in Suriname
and are respectively, the Political leaders of A-Combination
and the National Democratic Party, parties which have 20 of
the 51 seats in Parliament. A-Combination, which has 5
seats, is currently in the ruling coalition. Up to now,
nothing has been said about the investigation of the Moiwana
massacre, indeed a very sensitive issue in politics in
Suriname.

On July 15, the President will publicly apologize on behalf
of Suriname to the Moiwana community for the killings by a
unit of the National Army on 29 November 1986. The man who
was the military commander during that period is currently
the Political leader of the NDP, the biggest political party
in Suriname, and was chosen by the people to represent them
in the Parliament. What a dilemma for the President. He
cannot invite the two to join him on July 15 when he will be
in the Moiwana village. The internationally motivated
judgment came about because consecutive governments did not
investigate what exactly transpired on November 29, 1986 and
who was responsible for killing the innocent villagers. And
still we are being very careful. The constitutional state is
recovering, but is still very fragile. The current Minister
of Justice and Police and the Attorney General lead this
process of recovery, and we should not underestimate the
load on their shoulders especially if we take into account
the counter forces.

Executing the judgment of the Inter-American Court of Human
Rights will place Suriname in the category of countries that
deal with their troubled past. Executing the judgment shows

PARAMARIBO 00000449 002.4 OF 002


that Suriname respects human rights. It is of course very
sad that local human rights NGOs, assisted by international
NGOs, had to bring this case to an international forum. They
had to do this, as over the 18-20 years since the killings,
local efforts to move the Government to investigate the
killings did not lead to prosecution of the perpetrators and
compensation of the villagers for damages.

The human rights organizations also have to be complimented
for their effort and their drive. They brought forward this
case and were successful in the end. This case shows that
local groups can be successful in pressuring the Government
and it also shows that international treaties have to be
observed. If a country wants to be part of the international
community, it has to comply with international standards.
Treaties can't just be signed, but the citizens should also
be educated so they know the obligations the state has as
the result of the treaty. How many Surinamese know the
articles of the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights?

The public ceremony on Saturday should be seen as a
cleansing ceremony for the Surinamese people and a warning
for people who violate human rights in the Republic
Suriname. The next step is that the State should bring
clarity in the December murders of 1982, because in that
case there are also families who suffered psychologically,
morally and materially.

END TEXT OF EDITORIAL


3. (U) In the event, Venetiaan went, and offered the apology
required by the court ruling, while stressing his current
government was unimplicated. Desi and Ronnie did not
attend, although Brunswijk was present at the second
ceremony at the actual massacre site. This thoughtful piece
captures both the importance and the difficulty of resolving
the echoes of a difficult period in Suriname's history.

BARNES