Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06PARAMARIBO438
2006-07-13 16:49:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Embassy Paramaribo
Cable title:  

MEETING WITH PRESIDENT VENETIAAN REVEALS SUPPORT

Tags:  PREL UNSC CARICOM VE NS 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0022
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHPO #0438 1941649
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 131649Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY PARAMARIBO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8522
INFO RUCNCOM/EC CARICOM COLLECTIVE
RUEHBE/AMEMBASSY BELIZE 0788
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 1565
RUEHGT/AMEMBASSY GUATEMALA 0020
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 0014
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0047
RHMFISS/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
C O N F I D E N T I A L PARAMARIBO 000438 

SIPDIS

NOFORN
SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR WHA/CAR; SOUTHCOM ALSO FOR POLAD

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/12/2016
TAGS: PREL UNSC CARICOM VE NS
SUBJECT: MEETING WITH PRESIDENT VENETIAAN REVEALS SUPPORT
FOR VENEZUELAN UNSC CANDIDACY

REF: A. GEORGETOWN 679


B. PARAMARIBO 425

Classified By: AMBASSADOR MARSHA E. BARNES, REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L PARAMARIBO 000438

SIPDIS

NOFORN
SIPDIS

DEPARTMENT FOR WHA/CAR; SOUTHCOM ALSO FOR POLAD

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/12/2016
TAGS: PREL UNSC CARICOM VE NS
SUBJECT: MEETING WITH PRESIDENT VENETIAAN REVEALS SUPPORT
FOR VENEZUELAN UNSC CANDIDACY

REF: A. GEORGETOWN 679


B. PARAMARIBO 425

Classified By: AMBASSADOR MARSHA E. BARNES, REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)


1. (C) President Venetiaan told the Ambassador in a meeting
on July 12 that while the recent CARICOM Heads of Government
meeting in St. Kitts had not finalized a formal common
position on the UNSC vote, it was his view that CARICOM
hoped to reach consensus to support Venezuela in its UNSC
seat candidacy. Echoing Georgetown reporting (ref a) about
CARICOM member intentions to extract concessions in exchange
for their support, Venetiaan said that a CARICOM delegation
would call on President Chavez to discuss Venezuela's
position on a variety of border disputes with CARICOM members
before making a final decision.


2. (C) The ambassador had asked the President to clarify
uncertainty surrounding the outcome of the St. Kitts meeting,
since there were conflicting reports about whether the heads
of state had agreed on a unified position with regard to
Venezuela's UNSC candidacy. She noted that Venezuelan has
shown itself to be disruptive in a variety of international
fora, citing its rejection of the outcome document at the
2005 World Summit in New York and its behavior at the
Community of Democracies meeting in Chile. Venezuela should
therefore not be given the opportunity to be disruptive in an
environment where such critical issues are discussed as in
the UNSC. While she realized that CARICOM members may find
Venezuela's offer of inexpensive funding for fuel purchases
attractive, she wondered in fact after Venezuela's national
day celebration whether Venezuela could truly be seen as
playing a constructive role in Suriname. (Ref b details the
presence of indicted criminals and other unsavory figures
from Suriname's period of military dictatorship at
Venezuela's July 5 reception.) Furthermore, while UNSC
candidate Guatemala's border dispute with Belize is being
addressed within the OAS, Venezuela makes sizable claims on
Guyana, has maritime boundary disputes with seven CARICOM
members, and may have played an unhelpful role in
discouraging foreign investment in Guyana. Finally, she
understood that the Inter American Human Rights Commission
had recently expressed concern that a new Venezuelan
requirement for TV licenses constituted a limit on freedom of
expression.


3. (C) Addressing Venezuela's prospects for being a
disruptive international force, Venetiaan briefly noted that
since the Iraq war some might lay a similar charge against
the United States. He regretted the harsh tone of public
discourse between Venezuela and the USG, saying he thought it
was better to conduct relations more diplomatically.
Recalling that despite these disagreements the U.S. remained
a major purchaser of Venezuelan oil, Venetiaan said that
sometimes trade interests and rhetoric diverge; he thought
there would be a good basis for cooperation with Venezuela on
the Council.


4. (C) However, one of the reasons there had been no
public mention of a common CARICOM position in St. Kitts
related directly to the border disputes the ambassador had
raised. CARICOM intended to send a delegation to discuss
these with Chavez, and take their final decision thereafter.
He hoped that CARICOM would "have the opportunity" to support
Venezuela. When the ambassador asked if CARICOMs support for
Venezuela was proactive or merely against Guatemala's
candidacy, Venetiaan replied that the answer differed among
the various states. He did say that Caribbean banana
producers and Guatemala had disagreements on the best
structure for a banana regime.


5. (C) Comment: The upcoming delegation to Caracas
notwithstanding, Venetiaan appeared to anticipate an eventual
outcome supporting Venezuela. From his comments, it would
appear we could put to productive use against that conclusion
any evidence about unhelpful Venezuelan actions against
investments in the region, statements undermining Caribbean
banana interests, or signs of persistence in land/maritime
claims. We would appreciate any information the Department
might provide.
BARNES