Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06OSLO630
2006-05-15 14:47:00
SECRET//NOFORN
Embassy Oslo
Cable title:  

(S) NORWAY WILL NOT PUBLICLY SUPPORT UN 1267

Tags:  PTER PREL UNAUS NO KTFN 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0014
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHNY #0630 1351447
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
P 151447Z MAY 06
FM AMEMBASSY OSLO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3978
INFO RUEHCP/AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN PRIORITY 2073
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 0480
RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM PRIORITY 2842
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 1354
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0160
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHGB/AMEMBASSY BAGHDAD PRIORITY 0075
S E C R E T OSLO 000630 

SIPDIS

NOFORN
SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EB/ESC/TFS (BENDANA),EUR/PGI (REASOR),S/CT
(KUSHNER)
TREASURY/TFFC (HEFFERNAN),TREASURY/OIA (LEVITT)
NSC (HINNEN)
COPENHAGEN FOR LEGATT

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/15/2016
TAGS: PTER PREL UNAUS NO KTFN
SUBJECT: (S) NORWAY WILL NOT PUBLICLY SUPPORT UN 1267
KREKAR DESIGNATION

REF: A. SECSTATE 77696


B. OSLO 14

Classified By: Ambassador Benson K. Whitney, reason 1.4 (b) and (d)

S E C R E T OSLO 000630

SIPDIS

NOFORN
SIPDIS

DEPT FOR EB/ESC/TFS (BENDANA),EUR/PGI (REASOR),S/CT
(KUSHNER)
TREASURY/TFFC (HEFFERNAN),TREASURY/OIA (LEVITT)
NSC (HINNEN)
COPENHAGEN FOR LEGATT

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/15/2016
TAGS: PTER PREL UNAUS NO KTFN
SUBJECT: (S) NORWAY WILL NOT PUBLICLY SUPPORT UN 1267
KREKAR DESIGNATION

REF: A. SECSTATE 77696


B. OSLO 14

Classified By: Ambassador Benson K. Whitney, reason 1.4 (b) and (d)


1. (S/NOFORN) In our previous conversations on the topic of
a possible 1267 listing against Mullah Krekar (reftel B),MFA
Legal Advisor Rolf Einar Fife made absolutely clear that
Norway would not support overtly a UNSCR 1267 listing for
Mullah Krekar. The MFA wants no fingers pointing back to
Norway and is terrified lest it ever became public knowledge
that we have had any official bilateral communication on this
subject. Norway will neither oppose nor support our efforts
to designate Krekar. Fife did not tell us that we should not
try to list Krekar; however, he made clear that Norway would
not take part in any way.


2. (S/NOFORN) There has been no demonstrable change in
circumstances since we previously approached Norway on this
subject. As we reported, the greatest danger to the domestic
Norwegian process of expelling Krekar is if the media somehow
manages to link our actions to the ongoing Norwegian efforts
to kick him out. Krekar is already a discredited figure in
Norway, and Norwegian authorities have already seized his
assets. A UNSCR 1267 listing would have little domestic
impact in terms of further exposing or isolating Krekar.

Visit Oslo's Classified website:
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/oslo/index.cf m

WHITNEY