Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06OSLO553
2006-05-03 12:35:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Oslo
Cable title:  

A/S BOUCHER'S MEETING WITH NORWEGIAN DFM JOHANSEN

Tags:  ENRG ETTC PARM PREL IN PGOV PHUM PTER NP CE 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0001
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHNY #0553/01 1231235
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 031235Z MAY 06
FM AMEMBASSY OSLO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3897
INFO RUCNNSG/NUCLEAR SUPPLIERS GROUP COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO PRIORITY 0333
RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL PRIORITY 0142
RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU PRIORITY 0115
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 0411
C O N F I D E N T I A L OSLO 000553 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/28/2016
TAGS: ENRG ETTC PARM PREL IN PGOV PHUM PTER NP CE
AF, NO, KNNP, KSCA
SUBJECT: A/S BOUCHER'S MEETING WITH NORWEGIAN DFM JOHANSEN

REF: OSLO 551

Classified By: Pol/Econ Counselor Mike Hammer, reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L OSLO 000553

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/28/2016
TAGS: ENRG ETTC PARM PREL IN PGOV PHUM PTER NP CE
AF, NO, KNNP, KSCA
SUBJECT: A/S BOUCHER'S MEETING WITH NORWEGIAN DFM JOHANSEN

REF: OSLO 551

Classified By: Pol/Econ Counselor Mike Hammer, reasons 1.4 (b) and (d)

1.(C) On April 28, following the Sri-Lanka Co-Chairs
meeting (reftel),A/S Boucher accompanied by Ambassador
Whitney met with Deputy Foreign Minister Raymond Johansen and
Sri Lanka Special Envoy Jon Hanssen-Bauer. Topics included
Norway's role in Afghanistan, India's nuclear program, Iran,
Nepal and Sri Lanka.

Norwegians Remain Committed to Afghanistan
--------------

2.(C) DFM Johansen stated that Afghanistan was "quite
important for Norway," and reviewed his country's Afghanistan
commitments, including the Norwegian troop presence and the
Norwegian-led PRT in Meymaneh. He stated that Norway's
Afghanistan commitments were an important part in the war on
terror. In particular, he noted the long-term Norwegian
engagement in Northern Afghanistan and reiterated that he
wanted the U.S. to "know we are committed," as evidenced by
the substantial troop contributions in relation to Norway's
small population. He also cited Norway's goal to get
Norwegian humanitarian groups increasingly involved in
Afghanistan.

3.(C) Johansen expressed concern over ongoing tensions
between Pakistan and Afghanistan. He pointed out that the
growing influence of Pakistani-Norwegians domestically, as
this ethnic group is Norway's largest minority in a fairly
homogeneous. To demonstrate the depth of engagement, the
Norwegians noted a recent trip to Afghanistan involving five
Norwegian Deputy Ministers (two from the MFA, the remainder
from the Ministries of Justice and Defense, in addition to
the Prime Minster's Office). The group came back energized
from the trip, feeling that Norwegian contributions were

making a difference and that if anything Norway's commitments
should increase. Johansen hinted that more assistance for
Afghanistan would be included in the government's next budget
(Note: Norway is committed to providing USD 32 million in
development assistance annually through 2010. End note.)
A/S Boucher commended Norway's engagement, specifically
citing the importance of civilian aid work and the value of
the PRTs.

India Nuclear Concerns
--------------

4.(C) DFM Johansen listed several Norwegian concerns related
to the U.S-Indian civil nuclear cooperation agreement,
including the long-term implications (e.g. Indian benefits
despite not following NPT obligations),clarifying the scope
of Indian compliance with IAEA issues and the willingness of
India to accept a clause terminating the agreement if India
conducts nuclear tests. Johansen also raised that Norway was
"quite concerned" that India has not signed the CTBT and has
no cap placed on fissile material. Finally, Johansen also
worried that Pakistan would pursue closer ties to China in
light of the U.S.-India deal.


5. (C) A/S Boucher systematically addressed each of
Johansen's concerns, emphasizing that Norway should look at
the strategic value of the U.S.-India deal beyond the
non-proliferation issues. In consideration of the important
overall benefits, Boucher urged that Norway support the
agreement.

Expanding Role in Nepal
--------------


6. (C) Johansen discussed Nepal and encouraged U.S.
involvement. In light of the recent positive political
developments, Norway would continue existing long-term
assistance and is considering additional "quick impact"
projects. A/S Boucher noted he would be visiting Kathmandu
shortly and welcomed Norway's interest in assisting with the
democratic development of Nepalese political parties.

Sri Lanka
--------------


7. (C) Johansen commended the efforts of the April 28 Sri
Lanka Co-Chairs meeting, including those of Special Envoy
Hanssen-Bauer, to prevent the situation from deteriorating
further. He expressed appreciation for the close
cooperation between the U.S. and Norway on Sri Lanka.
Iran: Shared Concern
--------------


8. (C) DFM Johansen (who visited Tehran in February) was
"very concerned" with Iran, finding the situation there was
"not at all heading in the right direction." While hoping to
avoid conflict, Johansen advocated that the "international
community must be involved." A/S Boucher noted that there
must be consequences for Iranian action and underscored that
the international community must stand firm.


9. (U) A/S Boucher did not have an opportunity to clear
this message.

Visit Oslo's Classified website:
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/oslo/index.cf m

WHITNEY