Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06OSLO1280
2006-10-11 14:40:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Oslo
Cable title:
NORWAY MAINTAINS SUPPORT FOR UN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
how-toVZCZCXYZ0026 PP RUEHWEB DE RUEHNY #1280 2841440 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 111440Z OCT 06 FM AMEMBASSY OSLO TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4744 INFO RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 1047 RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO PRIORITY 0125 RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 3028 RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON PRIORITY 0373 RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0195
C O N F I D E N T I A L OSLO 001280
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/11/2016
TAGS: PHUM NO
SUBJECT: NORWAY MAINTAINS SUPPORT FOR UN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
DECLARATION
REF: A. STATE 169257
B. OSLO 0705
Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Kevin M. Johnson for reasons 1.4
b and d
(C) On October 11 we delivered reftel demarche and white
papers to Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Office
Director for Human Rights and Democracy, Tine Morch Smith.
Smith accepted the documents and said that Norway intends to
support the declaration without any changes. She was aware
of our concerns which were presented in our prior joint
demarche (reftel B) and said that while the text of the
declaration is not perfect, the document is, none the less,
the result of over a decade of work and the only document on
indigenous rights that has a chance of being adopted by the
assembly. Norway still plans to give an "Explanation of
Vote" to define how Norway interprets ambiguous passages in
the document relating to self-determination and indigenous
rights, particularly involving Norway's Sami population.
WHITNEY
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/11/2016
TAGS: PHUM NO
SUBJECT: NORWAY MAINTAINS SUPPORT FOR UN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
DECLARATION
REF: A. STATE 169257
B. OSLO 0705
Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Kevin M. Johnson for reasons 1.4
b and d
(C) On October 11 we delivered reftel demarche and white
papers to Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Office
Director for Human Rights and Democracy, Tine Morch Smith.
Smith accepted the documents and said that Norway intends to
support the declaration without any changes. She was aware
of our concerns which were presented in our prior joint
demarche (reftel B) and said that while the text of the
declaration is not perfect, the document is, none the less,
the result of over a decade of work and the only document on
indigenous rights that has a chance of being adopted by the
assembly. Norway still plans to give an "Explanation of
Vote" to define how Norway interprets ambiguous passages in
the document relating to self-determination and indigenous
rights, particularly involving Norway's Sami population.
WHITNEY