Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06NEWDELHI994
2006-02-09 12:17:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy New Delhi
Cable title:  

AMBASSADORIAL ASSESSMENT OF BARAPIND EXTRADITION

Tags:  CJAN CVIS PTER PREL KCRM PHUM PGOV IN 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO1316
PP RUEHBI RUEHCI
DE RUEHNE #0994/01 0401217
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 091217Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9793
INFO RUEHCI/AMCONSUL CALCUTTA 1509
RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI 1277
RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI 0536
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 NEW DELHI 000994 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

L FOR SPOMPER AND MGUILIANI
DRL FOR CCAMPONOVO

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CJAN CVIS PTER PREL KCRM PHUM PGOV IN
SUBJECT: AMBASSADORIAL ASSESSMENT OF BARAPIND EXTRADITION
ASSURANCES

REF: A. STATE 6905

B. 05 NEW DELHI 9513

C. 96 NEW DELHI 14669

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 NEW DELHI 000994

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

L FOR SPOMPER AND MGUILIANI
DRL FOR CCAMPONOVO

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: CJAN CVIS PTER PREL KCRM PHUM PGOV IN
SUBJECT: AMBASSADORIAL ASSESSMENT OF BARAPIND EXTRADITION
ASSURANCES

REF: A. STATE 6905

B. 05 NEW DELHI 9513

C. 96 NEW DELHI 14669


1. (SBU) The MEA on February 7 sent Diplomatic Note
T-413/11/2004 with reference to the requested extradition of
Kulbir Singh Barapind (Ref A),along with the text of the
relevant section of the Indian Penal Code. The Note outlines
that persons extradited to India are protected by law from
torture and that Barapind's family, attorneys, and the
National Human Rights Commission will have access to Barapind
during his incarceration. The GOI also assured that officers
of the USG will have access to persons in Indian custody,
including Barapind, on a reciprocal basis. Ambassador's
assessment of these assurances follows the text.

GOI Assurances
--------------


2. (U) With reference to the requested extradition of Kulbir
Singh Barapind (referred to in the Indian note as Kulbir
Singh Kulbeera aka Barapind) and USG obligation under the
Convention Against Torture, the MEA has provided the
following diplomatic note:

Begin text of MEA Diplomatic Note T-413/11/2004, dated 6
February 2006:

The Ministry of External Affairs presents its compliments to
the Embassy of the United States of America in New Delhi and
with reference to their Note Verbale No. 06/054/Pol dated
18th January, 2006 has the honour to state that in the
context of the extradition of Kulbir Singh Kulbeera aka
Barapind, India has signed the Convention against Torture and
other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading treatment or Punishment,

1984. As a signatory, India has good-faith obligation not to
act against the objectives and purposes of the Convention.

The Indian Constitution provides for the protection of life
and personal liberty. It guarantees accused persons the
right to be defended by a legal practitioner of his or her
choice. India has legislation for the protection of human
rights. The National and States Human Rights Commissions can

visit prisons and can enquire on their own initiative or on a
petition into any complaint of human rights violation.
Indian criminal law prohibits the use of force or causing
hurt to extort confession. Persons violating these
provisions are subject to prosecution and imprisonment.
Extracts from the Indian Penal Code of relevant sections are
enclosed.

Further, family members, attorneys of a person extradited to
India as well as the Human Rights Commission have access to
them. Officials of the country extraditing a fugitive may
also have access on reciprocal basis.

Thus Kulbir Singh Kulbeera aka Barapind on extradition to
India will be dealt in accordance with the law. He will be
entitled to all rights of defense, protection, and remedies
available and shall not be subjected to any kind of torture.

The Ministry of External Affairs avails itself of this
opportunity to renew to the Embassy of the United States of
America in New Delhi the assurances of its highest
consideration.

End Text.

Begin text of Extract from the Indian Penal Code:


330. Voluntarily causing hurt to extort confession, or to
compel restoration of property. Whoever voluntarily causes
hurt for the purpose of extorting from the sufferer, or from
any person interested in the sufferer, any confession or any
information which may lead to the detection of an offense or
misconduct, or for the purpose of constraining the sufferer
or any person interested in the sufferer to restore or to
cause the restoration of any property or valuable security or
to satisfy any claim or demand, or to give information which
may lead to the restoration of any property or valuable
security, shall be punished with imprisonment of either
description for a term which may extend to seven years, and
shall also be liable to fine.


NEW DELHI 00000994 002 OF 003



331. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt to extort confession,
or to compel restoration of property. Whoever voluntarily
causes grievous hurt for the purpose of extorting from the
sufferer, or from any person interested in the sufferer, any
confession or any information which may lead to the detection
of an offense or misconduct, or for the purpose of
constraining the sufferer or any person interested in the
sufferer to restore or to cause the restoration of any
property or valuable security or to satisfy any claim or
demand, or to give information which may lead to the
restoration of any property or valuable security, shall be
punished with imprisonment of either description for a term
which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to
fine.

End Text.

Assessment of Assurances
--------------


3. (SBU) India signed the Convention against Torture in

1997. The descriptions of Barapind's protections under the
Indian Constitution and Indian Law are accurate to the best
of this Mission's knowledge. Similarly, this Mission
believes to the best of its knowledge that the rights of
access to Barapind by his family members and attorneys, the
National Human Rights Commission (NHRC),and US diplomats (on
a reciprocal basis),as described, are accurate and, it is
likely the Government of India will in practice comply with
them.


4. (SBU) During the Sikh insurgency in the 1980s and 1990s,
police routinely tortured and/or killed terrorists' families
and associates. Today, however, India has numerous activist
human rights NGOs that specialize in assisting victims of
police abuse, including some that focus on Punjab. The free
press is also sensitive to human rights, and the Supreme
Court has recently issued guidelines aimed at preventing and,
if necessary, prosecuting incidence of torture and custodial
abuse. The NHRC has emerged as an increasingly forceful
advocate for the observance of human rights.


5. (SBU) The Punjab of today is different from the Punjab
Barapind fled. Then, a blazing, foreign-supported insurgency
raging across the Punjab threatened the security of the
government in Delhi and deepened divisions between India and
Pakistan. Today, Punjab is one of the richest states in
India, with a progressive, pro-agriculture government whose
Chief Minister (a Sikh) is working to promote harmonious
relations among Sikhs and between India and Pakistani Punjab.
India's free press, including in Punjab, actively pursues
and exposes government excesses of all varieties, including
police abuse, torture, and corruption. The end of the Punjab
insurgency in the 1990s ushered in a dramatic decline in
custodial deaths and torture allegations. The current Indian
Prime Minister and Army Chief are Sikhs. The intensive
police and security force anti-insurgency efforts of the
1980s and 1990s are largely a thing of the past.


6. (SBU) As noted in the 2004 Human Rights Report, however,
custodial abuse, including sometimes torture, remains a
problem in India, and many alleged police violators,
particularly from earlier, more violent times, (including the
officer Barapind accused of having directed his torture) have
not been tried for their reported offenses. The Indian media
reported, however, that 59 Punjab police officers were found
guilty of human rights violations in 2004, and the Director
General of Punjab Police reported that criminal proceedings
had begun in the cases of two persons who died in police
custody during the year.


7. (SBU) Despite the improved situation, torture and other
forms of custodial abuse do continue to occur in all parts of
India. As a consequence, many cases like Barapind's may
also revolve around personal testimony that is subject to
coercion or force.


8. (SBU) While we cannot guarantee absolutely that Mr.
Barapind would not face torture or other forms of custodial
abuse, this Mission is satisfied that, given the assurances
provided by the Government of India and the high profile of
this case, it is more likely than not that Mr. Barapind's
rights would be respected and that he would not face torture
while in custody in India. The level of confidence that Mr.

NEW DELHI 00000994 003 OF 003


Barapind would not be abused could be further increased by
establishing a program of monitoring of his situation by one
or more human rights NGOs, or Embassy staff. His extended
family and local media will also provide a level of oversight.


9. (SBU) As noted in the note conveying the GOI's
assurances, Indian federal and state law prohibits torture.
India today has many human rights NGOs that specialize in
assisting victims of police abuse, including some that focus
on Punjab. The National and State Human Rights Commissions
should be able to visit Barapind in prison. Assuming
Barapind is also permitted to have contact with NGO
activists, they will help ensure that abuses, if they occur,
are aired in the Indian media.


10. (SBU) India's relationship with the United States and
the rest of the world is also dramatically different than it
was less a decade ago. India has far greater incentives to
be seen as a reliable partner and a country that honors its
international commitments. All this, together with the
high-profile nature of this case and India's interest in
being able to return others for prosecution in the future,
should help protect Mr. Barapind's freedom from abuse.
MULFORD