Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06NEWDELHI85
2006-01-05 10:17:00
SECRET
Embassy New Delhi
Cable title:  

GOI ON UN REFORM PRIORITIES, LET DESIGNATION

Tags:  PREL PTER EFIN PHUM KUNR KDEM IN 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO3215
OO RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHLH RUEHPW
DE RUEHNE #0085/01 0051017
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
O 051017Z JAN 06
FM AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 8193
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 9518
RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO 2624
RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA 2646
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 5493
RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL 2179
RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU 3287
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 7624
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 5993
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 2529
RUEHCI/AMCONSUL CALCUTTA 0667
RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI 0329
RUEHKP/AMCONSUL KARACHI 1517
RUEHLH/AMCONSUL LAHORE 1891
RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI 9584
RUEHPW/AMCONSUL PESHAWAR 2584
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 8339
RUEIDN/DNI WASHINGTON DC
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0480
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RHHJJPI/PACOM IDHS HONOLULU HI
RHMFISS/HQ USSOCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 NEW DELHI 000085 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR S/CT, IO, SA, USUN FOR E TUNIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/02/2016
TAGS: PREL PTER EFIN PHUM KUNR KDEM IN
SUBJECT: GOI ON UN REFORM PRIORITIES, LET DESIGNATION

REF: A. 05 NEW DELHI 9755


B. 05 STATE 229918

Classified By: PolCouns Geoff Pyatt for Reasons 1.4 (B, D)

S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 NEW DELHI 000085

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR S/CT, IO, SA, USUN FOR E TUNIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/02/2016
TAGS: PREL PTER EFIN PHUM KUNR KDEM IN
SUBJECT: GOI ON UN REFORM PRIORITIES, LET DESIGNATION

REF: A. 05 NEW DELHI 9755


B. 05 STATE 229918

Classified By: PolCouns Geoff Pyatt for Reasons 1.4 (B, D)


1. (S) Summary: PolCouns and Poloff conveyed Ref B demarche
on LET surrogates' terrorist designation to the MEA officials
responsible for UN affairs. New Delhi remains hopeful that
the CCIT will be completed soon, despite its disappointment
at a failure to finish the text in 2005, and would like
increased USG efforts to resolve the remaining differences.
GOI officials point out that India has been involved in all
aspects of UN reform, and recognizes that UNSC expansion (a
"long-term" goal) is only one of a broad swath of reforms.
The GOI has supported many US priorities in UN reform,
including the Human Rights Council and Peace Building
Commission, for the sake of compromise, but feels the US
should engage in more consultations to ensure that other
nations' concerns are met. Embassy New Delhi recommends more
frequent engagement with New Delhi to help reduce the
resistance to US priorities in New York. End Summary.

Terrorist Finance Pre-notification
--------------


2. (S) Following up on Ref A meeting, PolCouns and Poloff
conveyed Ref B notification in a December 30 meeting with MEA
Joint Secretary (UN Political) Sanjiv Arora and his deputies
Director (UNP) Ravi Shankar and Under Secretary (UNP) Manish.
Arora noted that his office had already received word of the
US initiative, as the Indian government coordinates very
quickly on terrorism-related issues.

CCIT Still Moving
--------------


3. (C) Continuing on the subject of the UN and
counter-terrorism, Arora told us that India was "disappointed
by the slow pace of movement" toward adopting the
Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism in 2005,
but believed that the current text being negotiated is a
"good basis to proceed further." New Delhi does not have any
problems with the "small additions," including general

references to self-determination in the preamble and an
addition to Article 18 related to military actions. However,
he admitted, the GOI recognizes that the US and some European
countries (including France and the UK) are "not comfortable"
with these additions. New Delhi expected and would welcome a
more proactive US role in finalizing these details, he
concluded.

Seeing a Bit More Eye-to-Eye
--------------


4. (C) PolCouns reviewed the progress of US priorities for
UN reform, noted the broad overlap of US and Indian goals,
and asked Arora what we could do in our capitals and New York
to work more closely together on items of common interest.
Arora responded that more frequent high-level interaction,
such as the successful November visit of S/UNR Ambassador
Tahir-Kheli would help both sides understand each other. For
example, he elaborated, the US should not hold on to the

NEW DELHI 00000085 002 OF 003


"misconception" that UNSC reform is India's obsession. In
fact, India was "very active" in negotiating all substantial
reform-related sections of the Outcome Document, he insisted.
Although New Delhi believes that an Indian permanent UNSC
seat is "long overdue," he continued, "we are prepared for
the long haul" to accomplish it, including working through
other reforms. On the GOI's next steps in relation to the
G-4 effort, Arora qualified New Delhi's commitment, saying,
"India will not be the first to leave the G-4 on its own."

Small Differences on the HRC and PBC
--------------


5. (C) Regarding the Human Rights Council proposal, Arora
reiterated New Delhi's preference that its mission be to
assist nations to improve their human rights performance, as
opposed to being "punitive." The GOI is "not comfortable"
with the peer review concept for HRC members, but would
prefer a universal country review system. (NOTE: Post will
report additional MEA consultations on the HRC septel. END
NOTE)


6. (C) Similarly, while India supported the Peace Building
Commission (PBC) for the sake of compromise, it was "not
entirely satisfied" at the "strong UNSC hold" over the PBC,
which was far beyond what the Outcome Document envisaged,
Arora stated. New Delhi considers itself to be a champion of
the interests of developing countries, in a way that is
"principled" because of India's constant emphasis on
multilateral action and consensus, and "pragmatic" as New
Delhi will need broad UNGA support to accomplish its UN
reform goals.


7. (C) Arora pointed out that while US and India voting
patterns are often divergent in the UN (a point we underlined
with data from USUN),New Delhi believes that this is often a
result of the US taking positions with a tiny minority on
many issues (for example, Palestinian resolutions). India
appreciates the US's "compulsions," and hopes that Washington
will also appreciate India's, Arora said. However, he
admitted, "multilateralists can dabble in too much rhetoric,"
conceding that some of the Indian PermRep's comments in New
York could be viewed as unhelpful. He added that the
solution to US-India misunderstandings on UN issues was
greater bilateral engagement.

Comment: Getting Closer
--------------


8. (C) Arora's comments illustrate the continuing evolution
in thinking about the UN that is taking place in New Delhi,
despite the presence of old-think holdovers in the Indian
Mission in New York. While the GOI is not yet ready to
jettison NAM-type rhetoric (and the constituency this
provides for India's UNSC campaign),many thinkers in the
capital (in and out of government) recognize that, in the
long term, India's interests are better served by joining
forces with other liberal democracies in multilateral fora
like the UN. Arora's request for increased consultations
with us on UN issues should hasten the penetration of this
message within the GOI, and help break down the resistance
rooted in tradition to helpful initiatives in New York. Post

NEW DELHI 00000085 003 OF 003


recommends and would welcome more visits by S/UNR and senior
IO officials, as well as consultations in Washington for
Indian travelers to New York.


9. (U) Visit New Delhi's Classified Website:
(http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/sa/newdelhi/)
BLAKE