Identifier | Created | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
06NEWDELHI5237 | 2006-07-26 08:35:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy New Delhi |
VZCZCXRO1344 OO RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHLH RUEHPW DE RUEHNE #5237/01 2070835 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 260835Z JUL 06 FM AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6995 INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 3154 RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO 6494 RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA 6504 RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 9541 RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU 7183 RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 9431 RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 3651 RUEHCI/AMCONSUL CALCUTTA 5560 RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI 5577 RUEHKP/AMCONSUL KARACHI 4931 RUEHLH/AMCONSUL LAHORE 2893 RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI 4801 RUEHPW/AMCONSUL PESHAWAR 3535 RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC RUEIDN/DNI WASHINGTON DC RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 1801 RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 4101 RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI RHMFISS/HQ USSOCOM MACDILL AFB FL RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC |
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 NEW DELHI 005237 |
1. (C) Summary: Poloff delivered reftel on July 24. MEA Undersecretary Jayant Khobargade (Disarmament and International Security) expressed GOI support for the initiative. Iranian Foreign Minister Manochehr Mottaki confirmed in an Indian television interview that several high-profile and critical energy deals between Iran and India seem to have hit the skids, blaming this outcome on Indian objections to Iranian price increases. There could be more to it than this, however, as Teheran may be using the energy deals to get back at New Delhi for its stance in the IAEA. End Summary. Indians Critical of Iranian Nuclear Objectives -------------------------- - 2. (C) Poloff delivered reftel to MEA Undersecretary Jayant Khobargade (Disarmament and International Security) on July 24. Khobargade stated that the GOI fully supports this initiative and the P5 1 offer to Iran, and promised to forward it to his superiors. 3. (U) On July 23, the Indian television news channel NDTV broadcast an interview with Iranian Foreign Minister Manochehr Mottaki, in which he replied to Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's publicly voiced concerns about Iran's nuclear ambitions. In the interview, Mottaki stated "we are transparent, Iran does not want and does not need nuclear weapons." Indian-Iranian Energy Deals Ready to go up in Smoke -------------------------- -------------------------- 4. (U) Mottaki also expressed doubt in the same interview that two critical energy deals between Iran and India will be completed, citing "changing circumstances from the time the deal was signed." Iran reportedly signed an agreement in 2005 to supply India with 5 million tons of Liquefied Natural Gas for USD 22 billion. According to Indian media. Iran is now seeking to raise the original price, from USD 3.25 to USD 5.1 per million BTUs. 5. (U) The Associated Press reported on July 23 that Iran is also trying to renegotiate prices on the gas-pipeline deal it had made with India. Iran reportedly wants the gas price linked to international oil prices, starting at USD 7.2 per million BTUs - but India has said it wants to pay no more than USD 4.25. The GOI is reportedly looking at legal methods of enforcing the contract over Iran's objections. India's IAEA Stance Effecting Energy Deals -------------------------- 6. (C) Though Mottaki denied any linkage between Iran's last-minute holdup on the energy deals and India's critical stance on Iran's nuclear ambitions, the timing seems suspicious. India has twice voted against Iran in the IAEA, and the Indian Prime Minister spoke out recently in Parliament that "it is not in India's interest to have a nuclear-armed Iran." Soon afterwards, Foreign Minister Mottaki canceled his scheduled ministerial visit to India, and four days later publicly announced that Iran is rethinking its prior commitments to India on the LNG energy deal that India desperately needs. (NOTE: The gas pipeline NEW DELHI 00005237 002 OF 002 deal has been troubled for some time, and was expected to fail.) Iran could be hitting back at India for its IAEA stance, using oil as a stick. PYATT |