Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06NEWDELHI1559
2006-03-06 11:03:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy New Delhi
Cable title:  

NEW DELHI-BASED CHIEFS OF MISSION BRIEFED ON

Tags:  PARM PREL ENRG ETTC KSCA KNNP IN IAEA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO0204
PP RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHLH RUEHPW
DE RUEHNE #1559 0651103
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 061103Z MAR 06 ZDK CTG RUEHCB 0210
FM AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0832
INFO RUCNNSG/NUCLEAR SUPPLIERS GROUP COLLECTIVE
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 6720
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO 0171
RUEHTV/AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV 0529
RUEHCI/AMCONSUL CALCUTTA 2086
RUEHCG/AMCONSUL CHENNAI 1929
RUEHJM/AMCONSUL JERUSALEM 0136
RUEHKP/AMCONSUL KARACHI 2580
RUEHLH/AMCONSUL LAHORE 2182
RUEHBI/AMCONSUL MUMBAI 1152
RUEHPW/AMCONSUL PESHAWAR 2864
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEIDN/DNI WASHINGTON DC
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 9418
RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHMFISS/HQ USSOCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
UNCLAS NEW DELHI 001559 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS
SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL ENRG ETTC KSCA KNNP IN IAEA
SUBJECT: NEW DELHI-BASED CHIEFS OF MISSION BRIEFED ON
U.S.-INDIA CIVIL NUCLEAR COOPERATION

REF: STATE 37461

UNCLAS NEW DELHI 001559

SIPDIS

SIPDIS
SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL ENRG ETTC KSCA KNNP IN IAEA
SUBJECT: NEW DELHI-BASED CHIEFS OF MISSION BRIEFED ON
U.S.-INDIA CIVIL NUCLEAR COOPERATION

REF: STATE 37461


1. (U) Drawing from reftel, DCM briefed New Delhi-based
Chiefs of Mission and senior officers from key Nuclear
Supplier Group (NSG) and IAEA member countries on March 3,
including Israel and Pakistan, regarding the March 2
announcement that President Bush and Indian Prime Minister
Singh had reached an understanding on India's proposed
separation of civil and military nuclear facilities and
programs, to enable U.S.-India civil nuclear cooperation.


2. (U) Reaction from the invited diplomats was generally
positive, reflecting the endorsement of the agreement that
had already been expressed by the leaders of key NSG
countries immediately following the March 2 announcement.

A FEW CLARIFICATIONS


3. (SBU) The Belgian DCM questioned whether the March 2
announcement -- by enabling access to international sources
of uranium -- would spell the end of the long-running US
effort to cap India's nuclear program. The Austrian
Ambassador, likewise, questioned whether the terms of the
March 2 deal (and India's ability to designate which
facilities are civilian) would lead to a possibly shrinking
percentage of India's facilities falling under safeguards.
We explained that the small current size of India's nuclear
industry, and the number of large output Russian and French
projects in the pipeline, make it a virtual certainty that
the percentage of India's total generating capacity under
IAEA safeguards will rise quickly. As for the fungability of
fuel and fissile material, we made the point that this is an
apples/oranges question. The US-India agreement is designed
to address India's legitimate energy requirements and to
strengthen the international non-proliferation system by
bringing the GOI into the international mainstream. As
experience since 1974 demonstrates, uranium supply is not a
significant constraint on India's weapons development; it is,
however, a major constraint on India's energy program. The
UK PolCouns posed the question of where India stands in its
consideration of the Proliferation Security Initiative. We
explained that this remains a USG priority and we continue to
get positive signals from the GOI, but this was not part of
the March 2 framework.

(U) Visit New Delhi's Classified Website:
(http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/sa/newdelhi/)
MULFORD