Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06NAIROBI5390
2006-12-29 08:23:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Nairobi
Cable title:
KENYA HIGH COURT REINSTATES KENYATTA AS KANU CHIEF
how-toVZCZCXYZ0000 PP RUEHWEB DE RUEHNR #5390 3630823 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 290823Z DEC 06 FM AMEMBASSY NAIROBI TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6243 INFO RUEHDS/AMEMBASSY ADDIS ABABA PRIORITY 9017 RUEHDR/AMEMBASSY DAR ES SALAAM PRIORITY 5024 RUEHDJ/AMEMBASSY DJIBOUTI PRIORITY 4499 RUEHKM/AMEMBASSY KAMPALA PRIORITY 1750 RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 2101 RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 2066 RHMFISS/CJTF HOA PRIORITY RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L NAIROBI 005390
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
LONDON AND PARIS FOR AFRICA WATCHERS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/28/2026
TAGS: KDEM PGOV PREL KE
SUBJECT: KENYA HIGH COURT REINSTATES KENYATTA AS KANU CHIEF
REF: A. NAIROBI 5214
B. NAIROBI 5129
C. NAIROBI 5099
Classified By: Political Counselor Larry Andre for reasons 1.4 (b,d)
C O N F I D E N T I A L NAIROBI 005390
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
LONDON AND PARIS FOR AFRICA WATCHERS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/28/2026
TAGS: KDEM PGOV PREL KE
SUBJECT: KENYA HIGH COURT REINSTATES KENYATTA AS KANU CHIEF
REF: A. NAIROBI 5214
B. NAIROBI 5129
C. NAIROBI 5099
Classified By: Political Counselor Larry Andre for reasons 1.4 (b,d)
1. (SBU) SUMMARY: On December 28, Kenya's High Court ruled
in favor of ousted KANU party Chairman Uhuru Kenyatta
restoring him as the party's leader and allowing his court
case against the registration of a rival slate of party
officers to go forward. The decision, a surprise to Kenyatta
supporters, questioned the legitimacy of the registration of
the competing slate of officers. The ruling was as much a
victory for judicial independence as for Kenyatta, especially
since government critics alleged a State House hand in the
KANU party shake-up. END SUMMARY.
BIWOTT SMACKED DOWN
--------------
2. (SBU) In a welcome but unexpected ruling, Kenya's High
Court reinstated ousted Chairman Uhuru Kenyatta, affirming
the legitimacy of his leadership of the KANU party. In its
decision, the court determined that Kenyatta's case disputing
the registration of a rival slate of party officers could
indeed be heard. In the meantime, Kenyatta and his
supporters can resume their former positions and control of
the party's finances, removing the break-away KANU members
who took their place in a late November coup. In that
takeover, MP Nicholas Biwott, the symbol of Moi-era
corruption and brutality, and a few of his backers called a
delegates' meeting at which they were elected as the party's
leadership. Days later the Registrar of Societies, a
government appointed official, registered the new officers,
officially ousting Kenyatta amid suspicions of a government
hand in the matter (refs B and C).
3. (C) Taking their case to court was not how Kenyatta
wanted to fight Biwott, but when their street protests were
met with tear gas, and their attempts to meet the registrar
herself were thwarted, he had no other choice. At the time
of the coup, Opposition Chief Whip and Kenyatta's right-hand
man MP Justin Muturi told poloff they feared that while their
case challenging the Biwott registration rotted in the
severely congested judicial system, the Biwott slate would be
allowed to stand. Early on December 28, waiting for the
ruling, Muturi expressed his concern to poloff that court
officials might be susceptible to interference.
SETTING THE SYSTEM STRAIGHT
--------------
4. (U) In her ruling, the judge castigated the Registrar of
Societies for not seeking to determine if the Biwott group
had been elected in accordance with the KANU constitution
before registering the new names. The judge also noted that
the Registrar had received KANU's protest letter a day before
accepting the Biwott group (as Kenyatta argued at the time).
5. (C) COMMENT: While Kenyatta was right to call the
decision a victory for multi-party democracy, it is equally a
score for an independent judiciary in Kenya. KANU's
expectation that the court would be susceptible to executive
influence followed naturally from their (likely correct)
suspicion that the entire Biwott takeover and subsequent
acceptance by the Registrar was the result of orchestration
by some members of the government. The December 28 ruling,
including its emphasis on the Registrar's dereliction of
duty, sets a helpful precedent as the election year begins in
three days. END COMMENT.
RANNEBERGER
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
LONDON AND PARIS FOR AFRICA WATCHERS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/28/2026
TAGS: KDEM PGOV PREL KE
SUBJECT: KENYA HIGH COURT REINSTATES KENYATTA AS KANU CHIEF
REF: A. NAIROBI 5214
B. NAIROBI 5129
C. NAIROBI 5099
Classified By: Political Counselor Larry Andre for reasons 1.4 (b,d)
1. (SBU) SUMMARY: On December 28, Kenya's High Court ruled
in favor of ousted KANU party Chairman Uhuru Kenyatta
restoring him as the party's leader and allowing his court
case against the registration of a rival slate of party
officers to go forward. The decision, a surprise to Kenyatta
supporters, questioned the legitimacy of the registration of
the competing slate of officers. The ruling was as much a
victory for judicial independence as for Kenyatta, especially
since government critics alleged a State House hand in the
KANU party shake-up. END SUMMARY.
BIWOTT SMACKED DOWN
--------------
2. (SBU) In a welcome but unexpected ruling, Kenya's High
Court reinstated ousted Chairman Uhuru Kenyatta, affirming
the legitimacy of his leadership of the KANU party. In its
decision, the court determined that Kenyatta's case disputing
the registration of a rival slate of party officers could
indeed be heard. In the meantime, Kenyatta and his
supporters can resume their former positions and control of
the party's finances, removing the break-away KANU members
who took their place in a late November coup. In that
takeover, MP Nicholas Biwott, the symbol of Moi-era
corruption and brutality, and a few of his backers called a
delegates' meeting at which they were elected as the party's
leadership. Days later the Registrar of Societies, a
government appointed official, registered the new officers,
officially ousting Kenyatta amid suspicions of a government
hand in the matter (refs B and C).
3. (C) Taking their case to court was not how Kenyatta
wanted to fight Biwott, but when their street protests were
met with tear gas, and their attempts to meet the registrar
herself were thwarted, he had no other choice. At the time
of the coup, Opposition Chief Whip and Kenyatta's right-hand
man MP Justin Muturi told poloff they feared that while their
case challenging the Biwott registration rotted in the
severely congested judicial system, the Biwott slate would be
allowed to stand. Early on December 28, waiting for the
ruling, Muturi expressed his concern to poloff that court
officials might be susceptible to interference.
SETTING THE SYSTEM STRAIGHT
--------------
4. (U) In her ruling, the judge castigated the Registrar of
Societies for not seeking to determine if the Biwott group
had been elected in accordance with the KANU constitution
before registering the new names. The judge also noted that
the Registrar had received KANU's protest letter a day before
accepting the Biwott group (as Kenyatta argued at the time).
5. (C) COMMENT: While Kenyatta was right to call the
decision a victory for multi-party democracy, it is equally a
score for an independent judiciary in Kenya. KANU's
expectation that the court would be susceptible to executive
influence followed naturally from their (likely correct)
suspicion that the entire Biwott takeover and subsequent
acceptance by the Registrar was the result of orchestration
by some members of the government. The December 28 ruling,
including its emphasis on the Registrar's dereliction of
duty, sets a helpful precedent as the election year begins in
three days. END COMMENT.
RANNEBERGER