Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06NAHA204
2006-09-19 09:39:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Consulate Naha
Cable title:  

ONE SMALL STEP FOR THE FUTENMA REPLACEMENT FACILITY

Tags:  MARR PGOV JA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO7085
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHNH #0204/01 2620939
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 190939Z SEP 06
FM AMCONSUL NAHA
TO RUEHC/RRF DOS PRIORITY 0003
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0593
INFO RHMFIUU/18WG CP KADENA AB JA
RHMFIUU/5AF YOKOTA AB JA
RHMFIUU/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUSFNSG/CDR10THASG TORII STATION JA
RHMFIUU/CG FIRST MAW
RUHBABA/CG III MEF CAMP COURTNEY JA
RHMFIUU/CG III MEF
RUHBANB/CG MCB CAMP BUTLER JA
RUHBBEA/CG THIRD FSSG CAMP KINSER JA
RUHBABA/CG THIRD MARDIV CAMP COURTNEY JA
RUHBABA/CG THIRD MARDIV
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RHMFIUU/COMFLEACT OKINAWA JA
RHMFIUU/COMMARCORBASESJAPAN CAMP BUTLER JA
RHMFIUU/COMMARFORPAC
RHHMHAA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHOVVKG/COMSEVENTHFLT
RHMFIUU/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA
RUHBVMA/CTF 76
RUYLBAH/DODSPECREP OKINAWA JA
RUESDJ/FBIS OKINAWA JA
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA PRIORITY 0183
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI
RHHJJAA/JICPAC HONOLULU HI
RHHMBRA/JICPAC PEARL HARBOR HI
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC
RHMFISS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA PRIORITY 0128
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA PRIORITY 0642
RHMFIUU/NAVCRIMINVSERVRA OKINAWA JA
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE PRIORITY 0255
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO PRIORITY 0219
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 0593
RHMFISS/USARPAC COMMAND CENTER FT SHAFTER HI
RUEHKO/USDAO TOKYO JA
RUALBCC/YOKOTA AB HQ USFJ
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 NAHA 000204 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: MARR PGOV JA
SUBJECT: ONE SMALL STEP FOR THE FUTENMA REPLACEMENT FACILITY


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 NAHA 000204

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: MARR PGOV JA
SUBJECT: ONE SMALL STEP FOR THE FUTENMA REPLACEMENT FACILITY



1. (SBU) Summary: In the first tangible step towards building
the Marine Corps Airs Station Futenma Replacement Facility
(FRF),late the afternoon of September 15 the Okinawa Defense
Facilities Administration Bureau (DFAB) and Nago City Board of
Education officials entered Camp Schwab to begin a cultural
assets survey. Despite protestors blocking the gates, blanket
media coverage and some city officials' initial reluctance to
enter into the fray, the GOJ proved itself willing to use
suasion and force, including the police, to take a necessary
preliminary step toward construction on Camp Schwab in support
of the FRF. End Summary.


2. (SBU) The afternoon of September 14, 30 - 40 protestors at
the front gate of Camp Schwab successfully blocked members of
DFAB and the Nago City Education Board from entering the site
for the MCAS Futenma replacement facility. DFAB and Education
Board officials need to enter Camp Schwab to conduct a cultural
assets survey, which is required along with an Environmental
Impact Assessment prior to beginning construction of the FRF.
Although city education board officials retreated after only
five minutes of confrontation on September 14, DFAB officials
did enter Camp Schwab that day to begin the survey, according to
DFAB Deputy Director Mamoru IKEBE. Ikebe told us he was under a
lot of pressure from Tokyo to make sure the surveys were done on
schedule, and not get pushed away by protestors as had happened
with the aborted environmental surveys in support of the 1996
Special Action Committee on Okinawa (SACO) FRF plan.


3. (SBU) Okinawa Prefectural Police (OPP) officials arrived at
Camp Schwab the following morning of September 15 and began
clearing protestors in order to allow DFAB and Nago City
officials again to enter the base. The OPP informed us it had
sent 20 police to Camp Schwab and estimated about 30 people were
blocking the gate. DFAB officials entered the base, but Nago
City Board of Education officials turned back without entering
Camp Schwab before the OPP finished clearing the protesters.


4. (SBU) According to the account of events given us by Nago
City Mayor Yoshikazu SHIMABUKURO, the Mayor then ordered Nago
Board of Education Superintendent Susumu INAMINE to conduct the
survey. Shimabukuro said Japanese Defense Agency (JDA)

officials in Tokyo were pressuring him, too, to make the survey
happen. Shimabukuro said he would not give in to the
protestors, and criticized the OPP for not doing more to prevent
protestors from blocking the entrance to Camp Schwab. He
complained that OPP knew there would be protestors and should
have supplied more police protection to better control the
situation. He also complained that some of the board members
sympathized with the protestors, and that was why they had
turned away so quickly. The fact that Shimabukuro, as well as
DFAB officials, had pushed Board of Education officials to
return to Camp Schwab was widely reported by the local press.


NAHA 00000204 002 OF 002



5. (SBU) At 1645 on September 15 the DFAB requested permission
to re-enter Camp Schwab the same day, which Marine Corps Bases
Japan granted. DFAB's Ikebe confirmed that three of the Nago
City Board of Education's experts on cultural assets did begin
the survey, adding he appreciated the Marines' help in providing
access that late in the day. The DFAB told reporters that, with
the introduction of three cultural experts into Camp Schwab, the
survey had clearly been effected.


6. (U) Superintendent Inamine told reporters that his experts
had not conducted a survey, as there were too few of them, and
they had too little time. What they had done was assess where
and what kind of survey should be conducted, he continued, and
further surveys would occur after September 19. Superintendent
Inamine stressed to the press that his job is to protect
cultural assets. In one article, the Ryukyu Shimpo remarked
that events showed the Board of Education's intention to
continue the survey despite protests. Another article cited a
highly placed member of the prefectural governor's staff
complaining about the GOJ's strong-arm tactics in carrying out
the survey. In separate analytical pieces, the Ryukyu Shimpo
claimed that the flow of events and conflicting statements
brought into sharp relief the growing divisions between the GOJ,
OPG, and Nago City.


7. (U) Both daily newspapers noted that MOFA's Special
Ambassador on Okinawa Issues Shigeie told reporters that moving
ahead with the FRF was an important part of easing the burden on
the people of Okinawa. He said the GOJ anticipated that by
gaining people's understanding and proceeding with GOJ plans it
would be possible to close MCAS Futenma and return it to its
owners.


8. (SBU) Comment: In this first showdown with demonstrators at
the gate of Camp Schwab, the GOJ demonstrated a previously
unseen willingness to twist arms and follow through, including
using the police to remove demonstrators. DFAB's Ikebe and Nago
City Mayor Shimabukuro both said they were receiving intense
pressure from Tokyo to ensure the Board of Education survey team
entered Camp Schwab on schedule. They, in turn, put pressure on
the Board of Education, which finally went in for its
preliminary assessment.


9. (SBU) Although the local anti-base newspapers were slow to
admit the protestors had failed to keep the Board of Education
team from entering Camp Schwab, and highlighted the limited
purpose of the Board of Education's September 15 visit, the
local media in general recognized this was a significant step
forward on the FRF plan. In our view it is a positive sign that
at the first attempt by opponents to use physical means to block
progress on FRF, the government authorities chose to call in the
police, and not to back down. This bodes well for
implementation of the FRF project.
MAHER