Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06MONTEVIDEO175
2006-02-22 09:48:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Montevideo
Cable title:  

UNIONS SHOW THEIR MUSCLE THROUGH RASH OF PLANT

Tags:  ELAB ECON EINV PGOV UY 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0013
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHMN #0175/01 0530948
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 220948Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5419
INFO RUCNMER/MERCOSUR COLLECTIVE
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC
UNCLAS MONTEVIDEO 000175 

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR WHA/BSC

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ELAB ECON EINV PGOV UY
SUBJECT: UNIONS SHOW THEIR MUSCLE THROUGH RASH OF PLANT
OCCUPATIONS

REF: MONTEVIDEO 10

UNCLAS MONTEVIDEO 000175

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR WHA/BSC

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ELAB ECON EINV PGOV UY
SUBJECT: UNIONS SHOW THEIR MUSCLE THROUGH RASH OF PLANT
OCCUPATIONS

REF: MONTEVIDEO 10


1. Summary: Ever since it took office in March 2005, the
Frente Amplio administration has engineered a shift in
labor relations in favor of workers, starting with the
derogation of a decree enabling police to intervene in
plant occupations and culminating with the recent passage
of the Union Protection Law (""Ley de Fuero Sindical"").
The predictable result has been a rash in the number of
plant occupations. Recent violent incidents shocked
Uruguay's traditionally peaceful population and catalyzed
the government's announced intention to regulate
occupations. However, the GOU's view of occupations as a
natural extension of the right of workers to go on
strike"" collides squarely with property rights. It is
clear that the pendulum has swung too far in favor of
trade unions, and how far the GOU will be able to back-
track and how effective regulations will be in controlling
the situation will be clear signals to investors, likely
to impact on job creation. End Summary.

GOU shifts labor relations in favor of workers
-------------- -


2. Since taking office in March 2005, the left-of-center
Frente Amplio government has progressively shifted labor
relations in favor of workers. Its first action was to
derogate a 1966 decree that enabled the employer to
request police action to evict occupying workers. The GOU
then established mandatory salary councils and finally
passed a union protection and promotion law (Reftel).
These actions triggered the creation of unions in 383 new
firms, a growth in the union affiliation of 31,000 new
workers, and a sharp overall deterioration in the climate
of labor relations.

Labor situation deteriorates rapidly as occupations soar
-------------- --------------


3. The strengthening of unions --blessed and promoted by
the GOU--, led to an eight-fold increase in plant
occupations, which rose from an average of 0.8 per month
in January/April 2005, to 2.9 in May/December 2005, and to
6.0 in January/mid-February 2006. Several firms,
including public ones, were occupied by a minority of

workers and against the open opposition of the rest of the
staff (Note: In several cases, the majority of workers
opposed to the occupation decided to create a competing
union within the very same firm. End Note.) The
overwhelming majority of occupations have been against
Uruguayan firms. While foreign companies have not been
targeted, several have been affected, including a dealer
of US-sourced Exxon Mobil/ESSO, an Italian chemical
factory, and a Spanish security firm.


Taped violent incidents were the last straw...
-------------- -


4. The recent televised transmission of violent incidents
at Naussa, a leather tanning factory, shocked Uruguay's
traditionally peaceful society. The February 14 evening
news showed a violent clash between Naussa's owner --who
broke into"" his own plant with a group of employees
opposed to the ongoing occupation-- and 18 occupants. The
next day, a 300-person crowd led by the union leaders
threatened to re-enter the plant by force, at which time,
unable to control the situation, the police convinced the
owner to leave his factory. The crowd then assaulted the
owner and his group of employees as they were exiting the
plant and smashed the windshields of three vehicles, while
police stood by (Note: The police say that the derogation
of the 1966 decree has taken away their only means of
intervening in such situations. End Note).

...that prompted the GOU to take action
--------------


5. The Naussa case may have catalyzed the GOU into action
to restrain the rash of occupations, as it realizes that
they are getting out of control. However, the GOU views
occupations as a ""natural extension of the right to go on
strike"", and its intentions are to regulate rather than
prohibit them. The GOU is thus reportedly considering the
imposition of a three-step process before workers can
occupy a plant. It would also rule on specific traits of
the occupation (e.g. necessary majorities to decide to
occupy and guarantees of appropriate preservation of
firms's machinery). The Labor Ministry has announced that
the new regulations would be passed within two weeks.

Comment: Collision between occupation and property rights
-------------- --------------


6. It is certainly good news that the GOU, prompted by
President Vazquez himself, has decided to take action to
control the escalation of occupations. The quality and
effectiveness of the new regulations remain to be seen,
however. Even if additional stages are imposed to delay
an occupation, the alleged ""right to occupy"" will
eventually collide with the owner's property rights. The
GOU's handling of this delicate issue will have a direct
impact on the quality of the investment climate and on job
creation. End Comment.

NEALON