Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06MINSK319
2006-03-23 15:34:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Minsk
Cable title:  

SITUATION REPORT 2: A RIFT FORMS BETWEEN

Tags:  PGOV PHUM 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO9435
OO RUEHCD RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHLA RUEHMRE RUEHSR
DE RUEHSK #0319/01 0821534
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 231534Z MAR 06
FM AMEMBASSY MINSK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 4077
INFO RUCNOSC/ORGANIZATION FOR SECURITY COOPERATION IN EUROPE
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE IMMEDIATE
RUFOADA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH UK IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 MINSK 000319 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/23/2016
TAGS: PGOV PHUM
SUBJECT: SITUATION REPORT 2: A RIFT FORMS BETWEEN
MILINKEVICH AND KOZULIN

REF: MINSK 307

Classified By: Ambassador George Krol for Reasons 1.4 (B,D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 MINSK 000319

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/23/2016
TAGS: PGOV PHUM
SUBJECT: SITUATION REPORT 2: A RIFT FORMS BETWEEN
MILINKEVICH AND KOZULIN

REF: MINSK 307

Classified By: Ambassador George Krol for Reasons 1.4 (B,D)


1. (C) Summary: On March 22, key member of the Aleksandr
Milinkevich presidential campaign Jaroslav Romanchuk offered
Ambassador a critical assessment of the team,s efforts to
promote democratic change following the likely fraudulent
March 19 elections. Romanchuk, a senior member of Anatoly
Lebedko,s United Civic Party (UCP) and director of an
independent think tank, noted the new rift between
Milinkevich and Kozulin over the October Square
demonstrations and the teams, inability to coordinate
efforts. In addition, both candidates, teams have been
unable to create a strategy, much less follow through with
any plans that they do prepare. Romanchuk predicted that the
opposition,s post-election movement, which appeared to have
so much momentum at the beginning, could soon be over if the
leadership continues to remain indecisive. End Summary.

Milinkevich Breaks Agreement with Kozulin
--------------


2. (C) Romanchuk said that the demonstration, which began
after the election polls closed on March 19 and had initially
gathered 10,000-12,000 people (reftel),was losing steam.
Mass detentions of participants are to blame for the
dwindling number of demonstrators, but so is Milinkevich,s
and Kozulin,s lack of preparation and leadership. Both
leaders realized that the decreasing participation in the
demonstration only helped the GOB authorities to further
discredit the opposition as a group that enjoys little
popular support and could make it easier for authorities to
violently end the demonstration.


3. (C) Looking for an exit strategy, Kozulin and Milinkevich
agreed to appeal to the demonstrators to disband and prepare
for the planned March 25 protest. However, on March 21
Milinkevich broke his agreement with Kozulin and encouraged
the demonstrators to continue until March 25. According to
Romanchuk, Milinkevich,s wife intervened and advised her
husband to support the demonstration. Backing out of the
agreement infuriated Kozulin, who later blamed Milinkevich
should the demonstrators suffer at the hands of the
authorities.

Demonstrators Act Independently
--------------



4. (C) Romanchuk said the demonstrators were acting
independently and would not follow orders from Kozulin or
Milinkevich. However, the demonstrators, comprised of youth
organizations Malady Front, Right Alliance, Zubr, and members
of other unregistered organizations are allegedly united and
will continue until they are removed by the authorities.
Romanchuk doubted NGO Charter 97 and Zubr organizers Andrei
Sannikov and Dmitry Bondorenko had much influence over the
demonstrators, who had expected a plan and leadership from
the presidential candidates, only to be disappointed.

Milinkevich and Kozulin Not Coordinating With Each Other
-------------- --------------


5. (C) Romanchuk criticized Milinkevich,s and Kozulin,s
headquarters for failing to work together. Kozulin was now
infuriated with Milinkevich and it was impossible to get the
two to work together. Milinkevich,s team continues to
ignore Kozulin,s level of support because he and his party
were not part of the 10 Coalition. Romanchuk said a
communication gap and lack of trust fueled the divide.
Romanchuk suggested to Milinkevich,s team to not alienate
Kozulin, but include him in plans to create a new interim
shadow government.

Milinkevich and Kozulin Unorganized and Unprepared
-------------- --------------


6. (C) Romanchuk noted both leaders, lack of a plan and
determination. The Milinkevich and Kozulin teams did not
expect to be able to congregate on October Square after the
polls closed on March 19 and, therefore, did not have
prepared speeches or a plan. The opposition leaders promised
support and clear and decisive action, but nothing
materialized. Now Milinkevich was asking people to gather on
March 25, but no preparations have yet been made.


7. (C) According to Romanchuk, Kozulin,s team was chaotic
and Milinkevich,s team was only reactive; neither one plans
ahead. Milinkevich lacks the political will to make
decisions and when he does, often consults with his wife.

MINSK 00000319 002 OF 002


Romanchuk opined that Milinkevich,s team must soon form a
strategy with concrete plans. If not, his position as a
leader will be over and the opposition would have to start
from scratch.

Opposition Has Found A Basis to Contest the Vote
-------------- ---


8. (C) Romanchuk said opposition lawyers might have found a
legitimate way to contest the presidential elections. After
the results were tallied, the GOB distributed a bar graph
depicting the percentage of the population that had voted
against each candidate. Romanchuk noted that since the
voting ballots did not provide such data and since no exist
polls were conducted, the graph,s empirical data was
questionable and could be determined as falsified.

Romanchuk Gives Alternate Election Results
--------------


9. (C) Romanchuk estimated that 25 ) 30 percent of the
population voted for Milinkevich and 6 ) 15 percent for
Kozulin. In a discussion with a Minsk election commission
official, Romanchuk learned that Lukashenko had received much
less than officially announced, but likely received 55
percent of the vote. Romanchuk believes that Lukashenko
would not win if the election process was truly democratic.
The actual voting process may have been relatively
transparent and fair, but every step of the election process
leading up to Election Day was controlled by Lukashenko. If
equal press existed and the opposition was not harassed,
Lukashenko could not have won.

Comment
--------------


10. (C) Romanchuk,s assessment of the situation in the
opposition camp is disappointing, to say the least. It was
obvious the leadership was not prepared for the large crowd
on October Square on March 19. The leaders failed to use the
moment and capitalize on the crowd,s enthusiasm and desire
to be led. The key challenge for the opposition and for
Milinkevich, in particular, if he is to lead the opposition,
is to maintain unity, leadership and the momentum of the
opposition,s message, which has attracted more people than
expected. That is the message we are giving to them as well.

Krol