Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06MINSK183
2006-02-21 12:28:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Minsk
Cable title:  

PARTNERSHIP NGO RELEASES SECOND ELECTION

Tags:  PGOV PHUM PREL 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0009
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHSK #0183/01 0521228
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 211228Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY MINSK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3816
INFO RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KIEV PRIORITY 3133
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 3324
RUEHRA/AMEMBASSY RIGA PRIORITY 1557
RUEHVL/AMEMBASSY VILNIUS PRIORITY 3544
RUEHWR/AMEMBASSY WARSAW PRIORITY 3201
RUEHBS/USMISSION USEU PRIORITY 0041
RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE PRIORITY 0876
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RUFOADA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH UK PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L MINSK 000183 

SIPDIS

KIEV FOR USAID
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/21/2016
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREL
SUBJECT: PARTNERSHIP NGO RELEASES SECOND ELECTION
OBSERVATION REPORT

REF: A. A) MINSK 132

B. B) 05 MINSK 1437

C. C) MINSK 138

D. D) MINSK 0009

E. E) MINSK 0114

Classified By: Ambassador George Krol for Reasons 1.4 (B,D)

C O N F I D E N T I A L MINSK 000183

SIPDIS

KIEV FOR USAID
SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/21/2016
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREL
SUBJECT: PARTNERSHIP NGO RELEASES SECOND ELECTION
OBSERVATION REPORT

REF: A. A) MINSK 132

B. B) 05 MINSK 1437

C. C) MINSK 138

D. D) MINSK 0009

E. E) MINSK 0114

Classified By: Ambassador George Krol for Reasons 1.4 (B,D)


1. (C) Summary: Despite potentially facing criminal charges
for reporting any information that may discredit Belarus,
election monitoring NGO Partnership anonymously sent via
email its second observation report on the elections.
Similar to the first report Post received (Ref A),the second
report covering January 21 ) February 10 describes
irregularities in the formation of precinct commissions, GOB
pressure on signature collectors and questionable annulments
of opposition signatures, and the limited amount of coverage
candidates receive in the mass media. End Summary.


2. (C) Although recent amendments to the criminal code make
it prohibitively dangerous to report any information that may
discredit Belarus (ref B),election monitoring NGO
Partnership anonymously emailed its second report covering
January 21 ) February 10 election observations to its
newsletter subscribers. (Note: On January 4, Partnership
director Nikolay Astreiko informed Emboffs that four detailed
reports on election observations from January until March
would be a main component of Partnership,s long term
observation plan (ref C). Astreiko told Emboffs he hopes the
independent media will pick up the reports and distribute the
information in them as widely as possible.)

Formation of Local Election Commissions
--------------


3. (C) Partnership concluded that the selection process for
precinct election commissions was flawed and biased, noting
that only one of the 74,107 precinct commission members (0.01
percent) was a representative of the opposition. (Comment:
Opposition candidate Aleksandr Milinkevich,s regional travel
manager Ales Yanukevich told Poloff on February 7 that two
opposition representatives were selected for the precinct
commissions (Ref D).) Ten percent of the commission members
were NGO representatives, but only six were from democratic
NGOs. Partnership noted the numerous examples of commissions
in which 90 percent of the members were from the same
state-owned company, making it easy for the GOB to put
pressure on the employees and, thus, the election
commissions. Partnership estimated that 99 percent of
commissioners at the local, regional, and national level were
ostensibly pro-Lukashenko.

Systematic Pressure Against Opposition Contenders, Campaign
Teams
-------------- --------------


4. (C) Partnership concluded that during the signature
process, GOB pressure on opposition activists working for
initiative groups was &systematic8 and greatly impacted
election campaign conditions. Such harassment included
intimidation, dismissals, detentions, home searches, and in
one case, beatings. In addition, the Central Election
Committee (CEC) invalidated several hundred signatures
gathered by opposition contenders Aleksandr Milinkevich,
Aleksandr Kozulin, and Sergey Gaidukevich for alleged
irregularities, but all signatures gathered in support of
Lukashenko were valid, which Partnership viewed as &highly
unlikely8 from a statistical standpoint.

Restrictions on Independent Media
--------------


5. (C) According to Partnership, the GOB greatly prevents the
independent media from distributing information about the
election while the state media continues to report in favor
of President Lukashenko. According to the Belarusian
Association of Journalists, 90 percent of state TV channels,
time is devoted to Lukashenko. Private newspapers would
publish information on opposition candidates, but CEC head
Lidiya Yermoshina announced on February 8 that publishing
candidates, election material in independent media would be
considered illegal material help and a violation of election

legislation.

Recommendations
--------------


6. (C) Partnership recommended that the authorities and CEC
stop pressuring the independent mass media and cease using
law-enforcement to interfere illegally in the election
campaign. Precinct commissions should follow Belarus,
election legislation and international principles of free,
open, and equal elections.

Comment
--------------


7. (C) The second report, like the first one, was sent
anonymously and lacked the detail Partnership used in its
coverage of the 2004 referendum/Parliamentary elections.
Regardless, Partnership and international observers (ref E)
will continue playing an important role in highlighting the
many kinds of election fraud the GOB will use to secure a
Lukashenko victory.
Krol