Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06MEXICO742
2006-02-10 18:10:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Mexico
Cable title:  

PAN DEPUTIES DENOUNCE BORDER FENCE PROPOSAL

Tags:  PREL PGOV MX 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO3208
RR RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHRD RUEHRS RUEHTM
DE RUEHME #0742/01 0411810
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 101810Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8849
INFO RUEHXC/ALL US CONSULATES IN MEXICO COLLECTIVE
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 MEXICO 000742 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS
SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PGOV MX
SUBJECT: PAN DEPUTIES DENOUNCE BORDER FENCE PROPOSAL


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 MEXICO 000742

SIPDIS

SIPDIS
SENSITIVE

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL PGOV MX
SUBJECT: PAN DEPUTIES DENOUNCE BORDER FENCE PROPOSAL



1. (SBU) Summary: On February 8, ten members of the National
Action Party's (PAN) faction in the Chamber of Deputies met
with poloffs to voice their strong opposition to the
provision of H.R. 4437 calling for the extension of the fence
that now exists along portions of the U.S.-Mexican border.
The deputies delivered a letter asking the Ambassador to
convey to the USG their opposition. Following the meeting,
the deputies spoke to the assembled press outside the
embassy, which was reported in the February 9 editions of
several newspapers. With Mexico in the midst of a highly
competitive general election campaign, there is no doubt that
the deputies were motivated in part by domestic political
considerations, and it is a safe bet that during the heat of
the campaign, U.S. immigration policy will remain a
politically convenient target. On the other hand, the
deputies emphasized to us that their opposition was deeply
rooted and principled, and that they felt compelled to speak
out given the strong views of their constituents on this
issue. Although we believe our discussion with the deputies
left them with a better understanding of the U.S. position,
the border fence remains a highly emotional issue here. On
February 9 the group announced they would conduct a 24-hour
vigil and fast in Tijuana. End summary.


2. (SBU) On February 8, and at their request, 10 PAN
deputies met with poloffs to express their strong opposition
to the provisions in H.R. 4437 calling for the extension of
the border fence, and the criminalization of an alien's
undocumented presence in the United States. During the
meeting, the deputies delivered a letter conveying their
"most energetic rejection" of the fence proposal, arguing
that policy decisions affecting life in the border region
should be "adopted in a framework of respect (and)
cooperation...and to the extent possible by consensus." The
letter argued that a border "wall" would violate Mexicans'
freedom of movement, and conflicts with the trend towards
increased U.S.-Mexico commercial, cultural and social
integration. In the letter, the deputies requested that the
Ambassador convey their views to the U.S. executive and
legislative branches. The Ambassador has answered the
letter, underscoring the need for improved border security

and the President's commitment to a temporary worker program
and challenging the assertion that the U.S. is planning to
close its border with Mexico.


3. (SBU) During the meeting, the deputies -- nearly all of
whom represented border states or states that have witnessed
heavy emigration to the United States -- emphasized that they
sought an open and respectful discussion of the issue. They
said that they greatly valued close U.S.-Mexican relations
and hoped to see even further cooperation in the future.
They recognized that poor economic conditions in Mexico were
the major factor contributing to illegal immigration, adding
that the GOM was seeking to implement structural reforms that
would create more economic opportunities in Mexico and deter
further migration. Noting the trend towards leftist,
anti-American governments in Latin America, Deputy Jose Osu$a
of Baja California warned that construction of the fence
could foment anti-Americanism in Mexico and help elect
left-wing presidential candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador.



4. (SBU) While the meeting was conducted in a respectful,
even friendly atmosphere, it revealed that even well-informed
lawmakers shared some of the public's misperceptions about
the fence proposal, particularly that it would somehow limit
lawful border crossings. Speaking with obvious emotion in
her voice, Deputy Maki Esther Ortiz Dominguez noted that in
her home state of Tamaulipas, numerous Mexicans had close
relatives across the border, who they were accustomed to
visiting regularly. She argued that the proposed border
fence would divide families.


5. (SBU) Responding to the deputies' comments, POL
Minister-Counselor recognized that the U.S.-Mexican border
region had a unique dynamic, with numerous human and economic
ties linking the two sides of the border. She explained that
many Americans perceived that the border was out of control,
that immigration had become a major domestic political issue,
and that there was strong public support for taking measures
necessary to restore order on the border. She noted that in
the aftermath of 9/11, the lack of adequate border controls
threatened U.S. national security. She clarified that the
fence proposal, if adopted, would have no effect on lawful
border crossings and that in fact, the USG sought to
streamline procedures for lawful border crossings. Poloff
urged the deputies to keep in mind that the fence proposal
was part of a comprehensive immigration reform package in
which the President sought to include a temporary worker
program. He added that given political realities in the
U.S., the President's temporary worker program -- which would

MEXICO 00000742 002 OF 002


benefit millions of Mexicans on both sides of the border --
stood little chance of success unless it were part of a
broader package that included enhanced border security.
Poloff also explained the tremendous social and economic
costs that undocumented aliens pose for U.S. border states
and communities. While leaving the meeting, one of the
deputies remarked that our explanation of the context
surrounding H.R. 4437 provided information that he was not
previously aware of and helped him to better understand the
U.S. position.


6. (SBU) Following the meeting, the deputies spoke to about
a dozen journalists outside the embassy. The deputies
announced that they planned to conduct public protests
against the fence; we understand that the first of these may
be scheduled for February 10.


7. (SBU) Comment: Election year politics undoubtedly were
an important factor underlying the PAN deputies' initiative.
It may be that as the PAN is widely viewed as by far the most
pro-U.S. of Mexico's political parties, the deputies felt
they had to prove their bona fides on the immigration issue.
Nevertheless, their initiative also reflects the very deep --
even visceral -- public opposition here to the proposed
border fence. It serves as a reminder that Americans and
Mexicans perceive the proposal in strikingly different terms.
Whereas Americans see the fence as a logical and justified
response to an uncontrolled tide of illegal border crossings,
Mexicans see a national affront, as well as a violation of a
perceived fundamental right to migrate at will across
international borders. Bridging this yawning gap in
perceptions will remain a major focus of our outreach
efforts. End comment.


Visit Mexico City's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/mexicocity

KELLY