Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06MEXICO2758
2006-05-23 15:56:00
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Embassy Mexico
Cable title:  

BORDER REACTION: MEXICO WORRIES ABOUT "THE WALL"

Tags:  PREL PGOV MX 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4492
RR RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHRD RUEHRS RUEHTM
DE RUEHME #2758/01 1431556
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 231556Z MAY 06
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0965
INFO RUEHXC/ALL US CONSULATES IN MEXICO
RUEHGT/AMEMBASSY GUATEMALA 3445
RUEHSN/AMEMBASSY SAN SALVADOR 2329
RUEHTG/AMEMBASSY TEGUCIGALPA 1555
RUEHMU/AMEMBASSY MANAGUA 0897
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 MEXICO 002758 

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

EO 12698: N/A
TAGS: PREL PGOV MX
SUBJECT: BORDER REACTION: MEXICO WORRIES ABOUT "THE WALL"

REF: Mexico 2637

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 MEXICO 002758

SIPDIS

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS

EO 12698: N/A
TAGS: PREL PGOV MX
SUBJECT: BORDER REACTION: MEXICO WORRIES ABOUT "THE WALL"

REF: Mexico 2637


1. (SBU) Summary: Embassy and Consulates continued
intensive outreach on border issues with key media figures,
the campaigns and political parties. While the GOM
initially maintained a remarkably unified public line
accepting U.S. border security initiatives, the attitude
changed dramatically after the U.S. Senate approved a border
"wall," spurring the same ill-informed public reactions we
saw last year. The tide turned quickly as President Fox
decried the "wall" while touring Baja California, SRE issued
and quickly publicized a diplomatic note expressing concerns
over U.S. actions on the border generally, and Foreign
Secretary Derbez convoked the solidarity of his Central

SIPDIS
American colleagues. For all that, the criticism of the
Fox Administration continues to build, and media are waiting
for new polls to show whether the PAN candidate Calderon has
taken a corollary hit. End Summary

Pushing the Word Out
--------------


2. (U) Continuing reftel efforts, the Ambassador pre-taped
and PAS placed sound-bites explaining the link between
border control and comprehensive migration reform,
reiterating President Bush's commitment to reform, and
explaining U.S. legislative prospects. PAS followed up with
calls to key media figures, while POL continued outreach to
the campaigns. U.S. consulates in Mexico also continued
aggressive outreach with press and political contacts. We
succeeded in getting a number of commentators to acknowledge
that the border control measures informed the ongoing U.S.
Senate debate, and press coverage of that debate has
generally been balanced.

Falling Off the Wall
--------------


3. (U) While the GOM maintained a balanced reaction
(reftel),it did so at a mounting public cost and changed
gears quickly after the U.S. Senate approved (in conjunction
with some migration measures) the construction of fences
along some parts of the border. Public concern was
quickly manifest, with even the industrial umbrella
organization CANACINTRA suggesting in a public statement
the "wall" would impede business and inhibit new investment.
Almost immediately SRE announced it was sending a protest
note to the U.S., and in a press release late 5/18 detailed
its concerns about the rights of Mexicans along the border

in light of National Guard deployments and other U.S. border
initiatives, all allegedly described in the note (which we
haven't yet seen). Derbez also convoked his Central
American counterparts to provide solidarity for Mexico's
concerns and stress their firm but respectful opposition to
the "wall." Finally, President Fox told audiences in
Mexicali 5/18 that walls should not be constructed between
business partners, friends and neighbors, while at the same
time applauding some measures approved by the U.S. Senate.


4. (SBU) A National Action Party (PAN) deputy and regular
contact of the Embassy said it was virtually impossible to
have a reasoned conversation focused on the balance
between border security and immigration reform. The
rhetoric in the Mexican press was just too strong for that,
and he accused the other two parties, Institutional
Revolution Party (PRI) and Democratic Revolution Party
(PRD),of playing this strictly as a U.S. vs. Mexico issue.
He said the election season made it unlikely anyone in
Mexico could avoid criticizing U.S. measures to increase
border security. He criticized the other parties'
presidential candidates for saying Fox is not doing enough
to stand up to the U.S. on this issue, explaining that there
was nothing either of them could do differently under the
same circumstances.

Sticks and Stones in the Campaigns
--------------


5. (U) The presidential campaigns almost universally
reacted to the U.S.measures by criticizing Fox's foreign
policy. Democratic Revolution Party (PRD) candidate Andres
Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO) called Fox a "puppet" of the
U.S. and a "straw man" for not reacting more forcefully to
the U.S. National Action Party (PAN) candidate Felipe
Calderon said a wall built along the border is not a good
signal. Institutional Revolution Party (PRI) candidate
Roberto Madrazo insisted the U.S. measures reflected the Fox
government's failure to secure the border areas and

MEXICO 00002758 002 OF 002


establish a good bilateral relationship.


6. (SBU) A PRD deputy close to the AMLO campaign told us
his candidate would not hesitate to attack Fox over the
border security issue, but would refrain from attacking the
U.S. He gave credit to the GOM for trying to present a
balanced picture, but agreed with his PAN colleague that
public upset over the issue was overwhelming. He admitted
privately that there was little Mexico could do to prevent
the U.S. measures, acknowledged that important discussion of
migration reform was progressing in the U.S., but said the
campaign would still have to push Fox on the issue.


7. (SBU) Comment The Fox Administration turn about comes
after days of campaign-related criticism of the President
and his team for a tepid response to U.S. measures. While
the Fox Administration held fast to its balanced set of
talking points regarding the deployment of National Guard
(not militarization, only support),once the U.S. Senate
passed authorization of the fences (seen in Mexico as a
"wall") the public response reached the hysteria of last
December when the Sensenbrenner bill was passed. We can
expect similar ebbs and flows in the public reaction --
prodded by the various campaigns -- as the U.S. Senate
discussions proceed.

Garza