Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06MANAGUA1192
2006-06-05 15:47:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Managua
Cable title:  

CREATIVE PROPERTY FRAUD IN NICARAGUA

Tags:  EINV KIDE ECON CVIS NU 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHMU #1192/01 1561547
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 051547Z JUN 06
FM AMEMBASSY MANAGUA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6466
INFO RUEHZA/WHA CENTRAL AMERICAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6467
UNCLAS MANAGUA 001192 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

FOR EB/OIA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EINV KIDE ECON CVIS NU
SUBJECT: CREATIVE PROPERTY FRAUD IN NICARAGUA


UNCLAS MANAGUA 001192

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

FOR EB/OIA

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EINV KIDE ECON CVIS NU
SUBJECT: CREATIVE PROPERTY FRAUD IN NICARAGUA



1. (SBU) Summary: Nicaragua's long history of uncertain
land tenure and a corrupt judicial system continues to
undermine real property rights and perpetuate the instability
of land tenure. Recent cases (amounting to extremely
creative fraud) demonstrate how deceptive real estate
manipulation practices persist in 2006, many years after the
Sandinista (Frente Sandinista de Liberacion Nacional or FSLN)
regime was voted out of office in 1990. End Summary.


2. (SBU) The FSLN, both collectively and individually, has
profited from manipulating the Nicaraguan judicial system as
a means to inappropriately extract dominion over property.
Parties now falling victim include, among others, outright
owners, a defunct Nicaraguan bank (BANIC),mortgage-holding
corporate entities such as the Nicaraguan Institute for
Social Security (INSS),and the National Grain Trade Dealer
(ENABAS). The modus operandi is evident: the FSLN identifies
receptive judges, enlists their services, and creates false
labor suits benefitting cronies or fronts -- frequently out
of the judges' relevant jurisdictions. Widely documented by
the national press and even acknowledged by the Nicaraguan
Supreme Court, this legal malfeasance has been under
investigation for some time, although the pace of
establishing responsibility has been glacial. A few
exemplary cases provide a snapshot of innovative practices
used to deceive rightful owners of their landholdings:


3. (SBU) American citizen Uri Kollnesher is a resident of
New York. A registered claimant in the U.S. Embassy's
Property Office database, he is the majority shareholder and
legal representative of the Inter-American Chemical
Corporation, Almacenes Generales de Deposito (ICADESA). In
1979, the principal ICADESA property was taken over by the
FSLN-controlled government. Until 2005, ICADESA retained
legal registry under its name, although physical possession
of the property was in the hands of the FSLN. At that time,
FSLN Legal Department employee M.L. Chavarria Rivas sued the
company, alleging that in 1995 owner Kollnesher hired her to
take care of the property. Claiming he neglected to pay the
US$1,000 per month promised, she sued for US$30,000 in a

lawsuit introduced and accepted by the Catarina, Department
of Masaya, municipal court. (The property is located in
Managua and neither party resides in Catarina: a
jurisdiction violation.) Nevertheless, Judge A. Berroteran
Acevedo proceeded expeditiously, naming a legal guardian for
ICADESA without notifying the company.


4. (SBU) Upon acceptance of the resolution by the legal
guardian, the property was seized and promptly auctioned off
to a sole bidder in the person of the FSLN's local
representative and current treasurer, F. Lopez Centeno.
Ignoring Nicaraguan law that identifies mortgages as priority
securities (first in line for payment after a legal auction),
the FSLN thus strengthened its physical hold on the property.
ICADESA's mortgage belonged to the National Grain Trade
Dealer, ENABAS. Although ENABAS was notified less than 24
hours before the auction, its representatives showed up an
hour before it was scheduled to take place, only to be
informed that the auction had been cancelled. (In legal
terms and on paper, the auction did take place; however, a
physical auction never occurred.) After the property was
"sold" to the FSLN, both owner Kollnesher and ENABAS
submitted complaints to the Nicaraguan Supreme Court,
claiming corruption on the part of the judge.


5. (SBU) Far from being limited to the Catarina Court,
judicial malfeasance on property issues is a nationwide
phenomenon. In a February 23, 2006 article, Nicaraguan daily
newspaper "La Prensa" described how a Spanish-owned coffee
plantation valued at US$1,500,000 was victimized in much the
same manner as in the ICADESA/Kollnesher case. Similarly,
two attempts to appropriate corporate holdings (land
belonging to defunct Nicaraguan bank BANIC and the Nicaraguan
Cement Company) were thrown out by a judge from the city of
Tisma in Masaya Department. The acting lawyer seeking to
finalize the illegal transaction was J. del Socorro Caceres
Zuniga, reportedly a colleague of FSLN lawyer N. Turcios. In
most instances, there is FSLN involvement following the
accusation of failure to pay wages to a property caretaker.
The accuser states that no promised salary was received; a
lawsuit follows. Legal jurisdiction over the geographical
entity or parties typically is fraudulent. Outright document
tampering to alter cadastre numbers also occurs, making it
appear as though a given property is involved, while in
reality another is being bought and sold. (The nominal
notary public in one such transaction had been dead for more
than forty years.)


6. (SBU) Property owners in Nicaragua continue to be
threatened with loss or violence, thus exacerbating land
instability and threatening economic development in affected
areas. An ambiguous panorama of possible judicial
malfeasance, combined with old-fashioned greed, is compounded
by slick magazine ads inviting naive would-be landowners to
buy low and watch their tropical paradise appreciate.
Questionable funding and/or inexact border measurements in
some areas can incite less creative, but commonplace, peasant
invasions. Further, indigenous-rights groups also seek legal
redress for lands they claim were illegally taken from them
in the southern areas of San Juan and Tola, near the
northernmost border of Costa Rica.


7. (SBU) Many Nicaraguans remember the confiscations of the
1980's that marked the ominous beginning of large-scale land
swindling on a government-wide basis. The 1990 "Pinata Laws"
legally confirmed the previous confiscation of thousands of
properties. With the Pinata as a backdrop, land tenure
issues still generate fierce social and political debates in
mid-2006. Unrest in the real estate arena fuels anxiety
among recent international investors regarding the outcome of
upcoming November national elections and the long-term
viability of investments in Nicaragua, though there has been
no noticeable downturn in what remains a highly speculative
market.
TRIVELLI