Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06LUXEMBOURG461
2006-08-22 13:36:00
CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN
Embassy Luxembourg
Cable title:
NO LUXEMBOURG DECISION ON HOW TO SUPPORT UNIFIL
how-toVZCZCXRO7528 PP RUEHAG DE RUEHLE #0461 2341336 ZNY CCCCC ZZH P 221336Z AUG 06 FM AMEMBASSY LUXEMBOURG TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5542 INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES PRIORITY RUEHLB/AMEMBASSY BEIRUT PRIORITY 0061 RUEHDM/AMEMBASSY DAMASCUS PRIORITY 0070 RUEHTV/AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV PRIORITY 0855 RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0113 RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO PRIORITY 0619
C O N F I D E N T I A L LUXEMBOURG 000461
SIPDIS
NOFORN
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/21/2011
TAGS: MARR MOPS PREL UN LE LU
SUBJECT: NO LUXEMBOURG DECISION ON HOW TO SUPPORT UNIFIL
REF: A. LUXEMBOURG 448
B. STATE 134133
C. LUXEMBOURG 438
D. STATE 132517
Classified By: A/DCM Dan Foote; Reasons 1.4 (b/d)
C O N F I D E N T I A L LUXEMBOURG 000461
SIPDIS
NOFORN
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/21/2011
TAGS: MARR MOPS PREL UN LE LU
SUBJECT: NO LUXEMBOURG DECISION ON HOW TO SUPPORT UNIFIL
REF: A. LUXEMBOURG 448
B. STATE 134133
C. LUXEMBOURG 438
D. STATE 132517
Classified By: A/DCM Dan Foote; Reasons 1.4 (b/d)
1. (C) A/DCM discussed the issue of contributions to UNIFIL
with MFA Deputy Defense Director Serge Alzin on August 22. An
uncharacteristically tight-lipped Alzin mentioned that the
Defense Directorate was working on the issue; he expects a
GOL decision on the composition of a contribution within one
week. When pressed to provide details of options under
consideration, including potential support to the urgent
first tranche of UNIFIL forces hoped to deploy by next week,
Alzin replied only that no options were currently off the
table.
2. (C) Also on August 22, emboff raised this issue with Desk
Officer Daniel Da Cruz in the MFA's vacation-depleted
Political Directorate. Da Cruz reiterated the stance that
Luxembourg wants to contribute to UNIFIL under the right
circumstances but continues to await further clarification
regarding UNIFIL's composition, mandate, and rules of
engagement. He expressed his hope that EU discussions at the
August 23 PSC meeting and further UN dialogue would soon
provide sufficient clarity for the GOL to arrive at a
decision.
3. (C) Comment: While Luxembourg appears ready to commit to
participation in Lebanon on some level, it is apparent that
the GOL will not be among the first to reach a decision. The
GOL is likely to closely and cautiously watch the situation
develop and make its decisions based, in part, upon both the
terms of the expanded UNIFIL mission and upon synergies with
other participants. Luxembourg's historic contributions of
small numbers of troops to international missions have
largely been in the context of embedded deployment with other
nations' forces. While Belgium has been its main partner in
such missions, Luxembourg's current participation in KFOR is
shifting to a French battalion in Kosovo. Deputy Defense
Director Alzin's admission that his directorate is working on
this issue signals that some stage of military planning is
underway for potential troop deployment; the question the GOL
must answer is whether Luxembourg will contribute troops,
logistics, funding, or some combination thereof. We expect
this issue to be discussed at the GOL's August 25 Council of
Ministers meeting. End comment.
WAGNER
SIPDIS
NOFORN
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/21/2011
TAGS: MARR MOPS PREL UN LE LU
SUBJECT: NO LUXEMBOURG DECISION ON HOW TO SUPPORT UNIFIL
REF: A. LUXEMBOURG 448
B. STATE 134133
C. LUXEMBOURG 438
D. STATE 132517
Classified By: A/DCM Dan Foote; Reasons 1.4 (b/d)
1. (C) A/DCM discussed the issue of contributions to UNIFIL
with MFA Deputy Defense Director Serge Alzin on August 22. An
uncharacteristically tight-lipped Alzin mentioned that the
Defense Directorate was working on the issue; he expects a
GOL decision on the composition of a contribution within one
week. When pressed to provide details of options under
consideration, including potential support to the urgent
first tranche of UNIFIL forces hoped to deploy by next week,
Alzin replied only that no options were currently off the
table.
2. (C) Also on August 22, emboff raised this issue with Desk
Officer Daniel Da Cruz in the MFA's vacation-depleted
Political Directorate. Da Cruz reiterated the stance that
Luxembourg wants to contribute to UNIFIL under the right
circumstances but continues to await further clarification
regarding UNIFIL's composition, mandate, and rules of
engagement. He expressed his hope that EU discussions at the
August 23 PSC meeting and further UN dialogue would soon
provide sufficient clarity for the GOL to arrive at a
decision.
3. (C) Comment: While Luxembourg appears ready to commit to
participation in Lebanon on some level, it is apparent that
the GOL will not be among the first to reach a decision. The
GOL is likely to closely and cautiously watch the situation
develop and make its decisions based, in part, upon both the
terms of the expanded UNIFIL mission and upon synergies with
other participants. Luxembourg's historic contributions of
small numbers of troops to international missions have
largely been in the context of embedded deployment with other
nations' forces. While Belgium has been its main partner in
such missions, Luxembourg's current participation in KFOR is
shifting to a French battalion in Kosovo. Deputy Defense
Director Alzin's admission that his directorate is working on
this issue signals that some stage of military planning is
underway for potential troop deployment; the question the GOL
must answer is whether Luxembourg will contribute troops,
logistics, funding, or some combination thereof. We expect
this issue to be discussed at the GOL's August 25 Council of
Ministers meeting. End comment.
WAGNER