Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06LJUBLJANA202
2006-04-03 04:16:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Ljubljana
Cable title:
SLOVENIA DEMARCHED ON ALLIED SUPPORT TO ENGAGE
how-toVZCZCXYZ0001 RR RUEHWEB DE RUEHLJ #0202 0930416 ZNY CCCCC ZZH R 030416Z APR 06 FM AMEMBASSY LJUBLJANA TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4704 INFO RUEHXP/ALL NATO POST COLLECTIVE RUEHSI/AMEMBASSY TBILISI 0032 RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 1096
C O N F I D E N T I A L LJUBLJANA 000202
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/03/2016
TAGS: NATO MARR PREL SI
SUBJECT: SLOVENIA DEMARCHED ON ALLIED SUPPORT TO ENGAGE
GEORGIA IN NATO'S INTENSIFIED DIALOGUE
REF: SECSTATE 51994
Classified By: Ambassador Thomas B. Robertson for Reasons 1.4 (b,d)
C O N F I D E N T I A L LJUBLJANA 000202
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/03/2016
TAGS: NATO MARR PREL SI
SUBJECT: SLOVENIA DEMARCHED ON ALLIED SUPPORT TO ENGAGE
GEORGIA IN NATO'S INTENSIFIED DIALOGUE
REF: SECSTATE 51994
Classified By: Ambassador Thomas B. Robertson for Reasons 1.4 (b,d)
1. (C) PolMiloff delivered reftel demarche on April 3 to MFA
Security Policy staffer Zorica Bukinac Cimpersek. Cimpersek
responded that Slovenia had no opposition to the beginning of
an Intensified Dialogue (ID) with Georgia, but cautioned that
Georgia should not be lumped in the same category as current
Membership Action Plan (MAP) countries such as Croatia,
Macedonia, and Albania. Cimpersek agreed that the purpose of
ID was to lay out to NATO aspirants the standards and
requirements for future membership, and therefore noted that
Slovenia was generally supportive of ID for Georgia.
ROBERTSON
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/03/2016
TAGS: NATO MARR PREL SI
SUBJECT: SLOVENIA DEMARCHED ON ALLIED SUPPORT TO ENGAGE
GEORGIA IN NATO'S INTENSIFIED DIALOGUE
REF: SECSTATE 51994
Classified By: Ambassador Thomas B. Robertson for Reasons 1.4 (b,d)
1. (C) PolMiloff delivered reftel demarche on April 3 to MFA
Security Policy staffer Zorica Bukinac Cimpersek. Cimpersek
responded that Slovenia had no opposition to the beginning of
an Intensified Dialogue (ID) with Georgia, but cautioned that
Georgia should not be lumped in the same category as current
Membership Action Plan (MAP) countries such as Croatia,
Macedonia, and Albania. Cimpersek agreed that the purpose of
ID was to lay out to NATO aspirants the standards and
requirements for future membership, and therefore noted that
Slovenia was generally supportive of ID for Georgia.
ROBERTSON