Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06LISBON1845
2006-08-29 17:57:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Lisbon
Cable title:  

PORTUGAL'S FOREIGN MINISTER MEETS WITH SYRIAN

Tags:  PREL PO IR SY 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6470
PP RUEHAG
DE RUEHLI #1845/01 2411757
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 291757Z AUG 06
FM AMEMBASSY LISBON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5109
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES PRIORITY
RUEHAM/AMEMBASSY AMMAN PRIORITY 0061
RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO PRIORITY 0052
RUEHDM/AMEMBASSY DAMASCUS PRIORITY 0075
RUEHTV/AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV PRIORITY 0226
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 LISBON 001845 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/28/2016
TAGS: PREL PO IR SY
SUBJECT: PORTUGAL'S FOREIGN MINISTER MEETS WITH SYRIAN
INFORMATION MINISTER


Classified By: Acting Pol/Econ Couns Cari Enav for reasons 1.4 (b) and
(d).

Summary
-----------
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 LISBON 001845

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/28/2016
TAGS: PREL PO IR SY
SUBJECT: PORTUGAL'S FOREIGN MINISTER MEETS WITH SYRIAN
INFORMATION MINISTER


Classified By: Acting Pol/Econ Couns Cari Enav for reasons 1.4 (b) and
(d).

Summary
--------------

1. (C) On August 29, the Foreign Minister's Diplomatic
Advisor provided Charge d'Affaires with a read-out of Foreign
Minister Amado's August 24 meeting with Syrian Information
Minister Mohsen Bilal. Bilal asserted that the Middle East
needed to be "reengineered" from the inside and that anything
imported or imposed was unacceptable. He reiterated Syria's
well-known stance that Israel was the stumbling block to
resolving the Middle East's woes. Bilal did not deny that
Syria maintained an active diplomatic and political dialogue
with Iran, but asserted that Syria promoted the more moderate
segments of the Palestinian and Iranian societies. Bilal
further noted that Syria's isolation was only strengthening
Iran's influence in the Muslim world. Amado underscored that
the region's solution would need to be solved by looking at
the issues strategically, not from an historical perspective.
Clearly, Amado asserted, Iran was not the solution. Syria
considered itself a "defender of Lebanese reconciliation" and
opposed troop deployment along its border, primarily because
it was a French proposal." End Summary.

Background
--------------

2. (C) On August 29, the Foreign Minister's Diplomatic
Advisor Paulo Lourenco provided Charge d'Affaires O'Neal with
a read-out of Foreign Minister Amado's August 24 meeting with
Syrian Information Minister Mohsen Bilal. Lourenco noted
that Amado had accepted the Syrian meeting request - passed
to the FM during his August 22 visit to Cairo - because it
was important to hear the Syrian viewpoint, particularly in
light of Portugal's commitment to contribute to UNIFIL. He
commented that the Israeli air strikes had agitated Syria by
bolstering Iran's standing in the region and further weakened
the Syrian regime which suffered from internal turmoil.
Lourenco also noted that over the last few weeks, Syrian
officials had met with Italian PM Prodi, the Spanish FM, a
German official, as well as with officials in Valletta and
Larnarca.

Israel the Main Stumbling Block
--------------

3. (C) Bilal asserted that the Middle East needed to be

"reengineered" from the inside and that anything imported or
imposed was unacceptable. He reiterated Syria's well-known
stance that Israel was the stumbling block to resolving the
Middle East's woes and underscored that there could be no
comprehensive solution without the return of the Golan
Heights. Bilal explained that Israel had secretly signaled a
willingness to resume negotiations, commenting that Israel
had "bought peace with Egypt and Jordan, and that now it was
time to buy peace with Syria."


4. (C) Amado insisted that Syria had to recognize Israel and
that any resumption of fighting would be unacceptable and
extremely detrimental. In response to Bilal's comment that
Syria had acknowledged Israel in 1967, Amado countered that
Syria needed to explicitly recognize the country.

Iran's Increasing Influence
--------------

5. (C) Bilal commented that Iran was clearly a powerful
player in the region, benefiting from its more advance
economy, from Arab disunity, and from the recent conflict in
Lebanon. He did not deny that Syria maintained an active
diplomatic and political dialogue with Iran, but asserted
that Syria promoted the more moderate segments of the
Palestinian and Iranian societies. He underscored that Syria
did not support Al-Qaeda but implied that Syria had problems
with its own extremists, which it could not resolve on its
own.


6. (C) Amado underscored that the region's solution would
need to be solved by looking at the issues strategically, not
from an historical perspective. Clearly, he asserted, Iran
was not the solution. Amado emphasized the need to bring all
the Middle East parties together, and that Syria could play a
constructive role by working more consistently through fewer
channels of communications. Amado criticized Assad's recent
comments as "destructive" and urged Syria to play a more
positive role in the region.

And Syria's Increasing Isolation
--------------

7. (C) Bilal noted that Syria's isolation was only

LISBON 00001845 002 OF 002


strengthening Iran's influence in the Muslim world. He
commented that the Syrian government was trying to hold
itself together, but that things were getting worse.
Regional animosity was increasing, and the Israeli strikes
had only strengthened the radicals. Assad, whom Bilal
characterized as more flexible than himself, was seeking
rapprochement through the Barcelona Process (acknowledging
that the process had evolved since its inception).

Defender of Lebanese Reconciliation
--------------

8. (C) With regard to Lebanon, Bilal commented that Syria
was "a defender of reconciliation." However, the recent
events in Lebanon had strengthened Iran's influence, making
Hezbollah even more problematic to the reconciliation effort.
Bilal underscored that Syria would consider troop deployment
along its border as "a provocation" because of the strong
"emotional and family-like bond" it shared with the Lebanese.
When pressed by Amado, Bilal admitted that Syria opposed
troop deployment along its border because it was a French
idea.

Comment
--------------

9. (C) Paulo Lourenco characterized the meeting as a "Syrian
cry for help." He noted that Iran's regional influence both
fascinated and scared Syria which felt an increasing
discomfort with its world standing. It appeared to him that
the Syrian regime was looking for a way to hold onto power
and impede Iran's growing influence. Lourenco underscored
that Amado's meeting with Bilal did not signal a departure of
Portugal's commitment to maintaining pressure on Syria and
that Portugal remained a staunch ally in the war against
terror. However, Amado felt it was important to hear Syria's
thinking as Portugal prepared to contribute troops to UNIFIL
in this very volatile region. Lourenco dismissed any notion
of Portugal freelancing or lack of solidarity with the US
position on rogue states. "When the chips are down," he
commented, "it is clear who we stand with."
O'Neal