Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06LIMA248
2006-01-23 11:58:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Lima
Cable title:  

OLLANTA HUMALA: KEYS TO HIS CHARACTER, LIKELY

Tags:  PGOV PINS PTER PHUM PE 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHPE #0248/01 0231158
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 231158Z JAN 06
FM AMEMBASSY LIMA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 8253
INFO RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA 2863
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 6454
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 8947
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ JAN QUITO 9936
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 0089
RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
C O N F I D E N T I A L LIMA 000248 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/13/2026
TAGS: PGOV PINS PTER PHUM PE
SUBJECT: OLLANTA HUMALA: KEYS TO HIS CHARACTER, LIKELY
ATTITUDE TOWARD THE US

REF: A. LIMA 86


B. 05 LIMA 5192

C. 05 LIMA 4854

D. 05 LIMA 37

E. 05 LIMA 74

F. 03 LIMA 4698

Classified By: Poloff David C. Brooks, Reason 1.4 (B,D)

--------
Summary:
--------

C O N F I D E N T I A L LIMA 000248

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/13/2026
TAGS: PGOV PINS PTER PHUM PE
SUBJECT: OLLANTA HUMALA: KEYS TO HIS CHARACTER, LIKELY
ATTITUDE TOWARD THE US

REF: A. LIMA 86


B. 05 LIMA 5192

C. 05 LIMA 4854

D. 05 LIMA 37

E. 05 LIMA 74

F. 03 LIMA 4698

Classified By: Poloff David C. Brooks, Reason 1.4 (B,D)

--------------
Summary:
--------------


1. (C) Peruvian anti-system presidential candidate Ollanta
Humala has offered little direct information about his
attitudes toward the United States. The absence of direct
criticism of the U.S. might lead some to conclude that his
ideas about the U.S. are still gestating and possibly could
be turned positive. We are pessimistic about this. Despite
a dearth of direct information, we know the pillars that
formed Humala's thinking -- his father, the military
(particularly the example of Juan Velasco Alvarado) -- and
his two circles of local advisors, one civilian and the other
military. None is encouraging. End Summary.

--------------
The Family: A Father Forges His Sons
--------------


2. (C) The Humala Clan is as much a political-ideological
cell as it is a biological unit. It is dominated by father
and patriarch Isaac Humala, a lawyer from Ayacucho, a former
communist, and founder of the Ethnocacerist Movement (MEC).
Isaac has an acute sense of history, and he has reared his
children, particularly his sons, to equip them to do great
things. Isaac claims that the Humalas are descended from
Inca nobles (called curacas),and the names he and his wife
chose for their offspring reflect either Inca roots (Ollanta
(named for a mythical Inca hero); daughter Ima Sumac, and
Antauro) or classical heroes (oldest son is named Ulises;
Ollanta also carries the name Moises).


3. (C) While the Humalas rooted their children's names in
Inca history, they opted for a highly Eurocentric education.
Isaac sent seven of his eight children (with Ollanta the
exception) to the Franco-Peruvian School in Lima. Ollanta
attended a Japanese-Peruvian school so that he could learn
Japanese. Isaac Humala has said he streered Ollanta and
Antauro to military service to prepare for a significant

historical role.


4. (C) Isaac remained in the Communist Party until 1956.
During that year, he was forced out for having led a
change-oriented group. Soon after, Isaac developed
Ethnocacerism. The movement represents a red-brown synthesis
of racist, quasi-fascist, pro-coca, anti-Chilean, anti-US,
anti-oligarchical thinking that is laid out in a lengthy
manifesto (nearly 400 pages) entitled "Peruvian Army:
Millenarianism, Nationalism and Ethnocacerism," reportedly
written by Antauro (Ref F). While the book identifies Chile
as Peru's natural enemy, it carries ample criticism of the
United States.

--------------
The Ethnocacerist Movement (MEC) and the U.S.
--------------


5. (C) To the Ethnocaceristas, U.S. political, military and
cultural influence has pulled Peru away from its true
Inca/Indian roots, causing Peru to lose the "ethnoracial"
glue that would have made it into a successful society.
Ethnocacerists believe that successful countries are those
dominated by a unified, majority ethnic group. They see the
downtrodden of Peru, the "cobrizos" (copper-colored people),
as a potential master race whose liberation lies in
Inca-style socialist reorganization and the creation of a
strong native army. U.S. influence, in their view, has
propped up a corrupt, white-skinned colonial oligarchy and
seeks to neuter the Peruvian Army, turning it from a national
instrument into a regional police force that works at the
behest of Washington.


6. (C) Isaac Humala did more than just develop MEC doctrine,
he also inculcated it, and the sense of historical destiny
that goes with it, into his children, all of whom are

intensely political. Of the eight, two are running for
President and one, Antauro, is running for Congress. Other
children and relatives are working in their different
campaigns.


7. (C) Ollanta has been subject to Ethnocacerism his whole
life. For five years, he lent his name to the Ethnocacerist
movement's newspaper, which regularly publishes articles that
favor coca cultivation, abhor Chile and, in recent issues,
praised Hitler's economics, referred to Saddam Hussein as a
martyr, and regularly pillories the United States. It would
be naive to think that Ollanta Humala has shaken off this
influence since November, when the family rift allegedly
began.

--------------
Family Feud or Tag Team?
--------------


8. (U) Recent events would appear (and we stress the word
appear) to have challenged the vision of a united family
described above. Antauro Humala publicly broke with Ollanta
in a letter published in the press on 12/15. Therein,
Antauro accused Ollanta of ignoring the sacrifices of
Antauro's Ethnocacerista supporters and the significance of
their New Years 2005 rebellion in Andahuaylas (Refs D, E).
He asserts that he felt "betrayed" by Ollanta, who had been
distancing himself from the Andahuaylas outbreak from the
moment news broke that Antauro's men had killed four
policemen.


9. (U) As the campaign rolled on in the fall, Ollanta's
growing connections to monied contributors and traditional
political actors ostensibly frustrated Antauro, resulting in
the "break." In December, Antauro announced that he would
support the Advance the Country (Avanza Pais, AP) political
party, which has nominated another Humala brother, Ulises, as
its presidential candidate and is running Antauro on its
congressional list for Apurimac. (Note: If Antauro is
elected to Congress, he will have immunity from prosecution
for his actions in Andahuaylas while serving. End Note.)
Patriarch Isaac has also pledged to support Ulises for the
Peruvian presidency. Despite the apparent rupture with his
family, pro-business daily "Gestion" reported on 1/9 that
Antauro Humala had sent a second letter to his followers from
prison in which he instructed them to support Ollanta should
the latter make it to the second round in the presidential
race.


10. (C) Comment: While there is speculation whether the
"break" between Isaac/Antauro/Ulises and Ollanta is contrived
or real, politically it enabled Ollanta to portray himself as
a "democratic" yet anti-system candidate. In addition, it
provided a soap opera that dominated the headlines between
Christmas and New Years. We suspect that the break most
likely constitutes a kind of internal family primary, with
the Humala family sending out different message-bearers, some
more radical, others apparently more moderate, to multiply
its messengers and to test which will ultimately prosper.


11. (C) Comment (continued): The "break" is tactically
useful. For example, it enabled the Humalas to "double team"
Congressman Michael Martinez, a pro-coca politician from
Apurimac, who now holds the Congressional seat that Antauro
seeks. AP Candidate Ulises attacked Martinez for allegedly
having betrayed Antauro and his followers -- Martinez was a
mediator during the Andahuaylas revolt -- and Ollanta
proposed a complete renewal of UPP's Congressional slate, an
action that surprised Martinez and left him out in the cold.
Martinez himself told Poloff on 1/12 that the Humala brothers
were working together to get Antauro into Congress and out of
jail. End Comment.

--------------
The Military: Child of the Velasco Generation
--------------


12. (U) Ollanta Humala attended the Military Academy in
Chorillos from 1976-1980, a period that followed the
military "revolution from above" led by General Juan Velasco
Alvarado (1968-1975). Breaking with traditions of Latin
American military elitism, Velasco led an Army Officer Corps
of increasingly lower middle class origins on a failed
socialistic and nationalistic experiment during those years,
one that saw mass nationalizations, the creation of state

industries, a chaotic agrarian reform and Peru's attempts to
enforce a 200-mile maritime limit. During the Velasco years,
Peru saw itself as a "third world" power, aspiring to a
leadership role in the non-aligned movement and a close
relationship with the Soviet Union.


13. (C) Despite the failings of the Velasco program, both
the MEC and Ollanta Humala hold up General Velasco as their
hero. According to Javier Ciurlizza, former Executive
Secretary for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, who

SIPDIS
has done extensive human rights training for the Peruvian
Army, many Army officers see the Velasco Era as a "Golden
Age" when the Peruvian military was respected, honored,
well-funded and popular. The years that followed, which
included a retreat into the barracks, democratic dysfunction,
economic dislocation, the war against subversion and
consequent criticisms on human rights, constitute a Dark Age
that has caused many younger officers, Ollanta included, to
look back with nostalgia to Velasco.


14. (C) During Ollanta's time in the military academy, the
teaching and curriculum borrowed liberally from the Velasco
period. Thus, Ollanta came into the military just as that
institution was beginning to retreat from the ambitious
social and international role it had assumed. Reportedly,
Ollanta's plan for government sounds like "Velasco lite." It
is said to include five-year plans for infrastructure, limits
on Chilean investment in strategic sectors, revision of
foreign contracts (including the FTA),and an emphasis on
Latin American integration.


15. (C) DAO sources state that while the upper levels of the
Officer Corps do not like Humala, particularly for his year
2000 rebellion (during the rebellion, Humala took his
commanding officer captive),Humala is admired among his own
age cohort in the upper middle ranks (Captains, Majors,
Lieutenant Colonels) and on down through the institution.

--------------
Ollanta's Advisors: Outer, Inner Circles
--------------


16. (C) Ollanta's contacts with Hugo Chavez and Evo Morales
have obvious political implications that need not be repeated
here. But Ollanta has other, local advisors. They fall into
two distinct groups, Carlos Tapia, a rural sociologist,
expert on SL and frequent critic of the MEC, told Poloff on
1/13. Tapia is a close personal friend of Ollanta's First
Vice President Gonzalo Garcia, who has provided him with a
description of the two-group structure of advisors around
Ollanta.


17. (C) The first is composed of a public group of
technocrats who are now working on Ollanta's plan of
government. The majority are left-intellectuals, a number of
them professors at the Catholic University. They see Ollanta
as a vehicle to promote "progressive" social change. (Note:
Javier Ciurlizza, a Professor at the Catholic University,
told Poloff on 1/12 that some of his colleagues think that
Ollanta has been unfairly demonized by the press and that
some are interested in a chance to "shape" the candidate's
views. Ciurlizza does not share their sentiments. End Note.)


18. (C) The second group, not known to the public, is
composed of a dozen mid-rank (up to Lieutenant Colonel)
retired military officers who were friends of Ollanta while
in the Army. They manage Ollanta's security, his agenda, his
meetings, and determine campaign strategy. According to
Tapia, they planned the candidate's recent surprise visit to
Caracas, arranging the trip in secrecy so that Ollanta and
wife Nadine would burst onto local news from Venezuela and
then setting up a post-visit press conference (Ref A) in Lima
that would create a news whiteout to obscure the other
candidates.


19. (C) There is potential tension between the two groups,
expressed in anxious remarks Garcia had made to Tapia.
Garcia said his role in the campaign was purely technical and
that Ollanta calls the shots. He stated that if the party
came out with some truly crazy ideas, he would leave. In
addition, Ollanta knows that he needs technocrats to govern.
He does not intend to try to repeat in literal fashion the
experience of the Velasco years, when Velasco tried to
militarize public policy decision-making.

--------------
The Candidate's Character in the Campaign
--------------


20. (C) Ollanta's background has cultivated a (so far)
highly effective anti-political, anti-institutional style of
operation. On repeated occasions, Ollanta has held out his
hand to party leaders offering an alliance, only to take
their followers or take over their organizations. Last fall,
Ollanta indicated his interest in an alliance with the left
(Refs B, C),but leftist leaders pulled back when he refused
to cede any ground in actual talks. After Chavez'
endorsement, this scenario repeated itself. Leftist Broad
Front candidate Alberto Moreno complained that Ollanta
offered his group nothing in talks about forming an alliance,
and reportedly Ollanta did not even show up for a scheduled
meeting with Socialist Party nominee Javier Diez Canseco.
While Ollanta flirts with and then ignores leftist leaders,
he has walked off with a number of their followers, as
demonstrated by the leftist intellectuals in his group of
public advisors.


21. (C) This pattern repeated itself in Ollanta's adopted
political party, the Union for Peru (UPP). Officially, UPP
has merged with Ollanta's Peruvian Nationalist Party, with
Ollanta as the candidate of the combined party, the
Nationalist Party Uniting Peru. The merger, however, was
more like a hostile takeover. Ollanta unilaterally announced
at a UPP Congress last Saturday (7/7) that the entire UPP
Congressional list would be "completely renewed," a maneuver
that would prevent three sitting UPP Congress members from
running for re-election, including pro-cocalero Congressman
Michael Martinez, the UPP leader who first invited Ollanta
into the party. Martinez reacted strongly, calling Ollanta's
action a "betrayal" and stating to the press that "betrayals
are paid in blood."


22. (C) A visibly depressed Martinez told Poloff on 1/12
that he was hoping that Ollanta would "reflect on his
decision" and reverse it. Even so, he concluded, Ollanta is
an authoritarian who plays to the crowd. Martinez glumly
acknowledged that if Ollanta did not change his mind,
Martinez would be compelled to leave UPP. He was confident
that Ollanta could keep a substantial fraction of UPP and go
on to win the presidency. Longer term, Martinez predicted
that, if elected, Ollanta's anti-political style would come
back to haunt him. At the end of the interview when asked
about Ollanta's attitudes toward the United States, an
heretofore open Martinez told poloff that "there are some
conversations that always stay confidential." (Note: A
somewhat shaken Congressman Martinez announced that he would
not run for re-election on 1/14, following a meeting of UPP's
directorate. Martinez is not leaving UPP and supports
Humala's campaign. End Note.)

--------------
Comment:
--------------


23. (C) Ollanta presents the picture of a "new face," as he
puts it, that many find intriguing. Despite this, a complex
of constants has governed Ollanta actions at every stage of
his life. These are: a disciplined focus on long-term goals
pursued through secret plans expressed in theatrical action.
From the cradle to the campaign, these elements have been
present. They have brought success to Ollanta, prominence to
his family, and have transformed him from unknown Army Major
into presidential contender in just over five years.


24. (C) While we may some day have to deal with Ollanta, the
influences that shape his life do not lead us to be
optimistic about his likely attitudes toward the United
States. He may be evolving as a politician, but he is by no
means a tabula rasa. End Comment.
STRUBLE