Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06LIMA1509
2006-04-19 23:17:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Embassy Lima
Cable title:  

U.S. VOLUNTEERS TO OAS ELECTION OBSERVATION

Tags:  PGOV PE 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0003
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHPE #1509/01 1092317
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 192317Z APR 06
FM AMEMBASSY LIMA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9885
INFO RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA 3271
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 6686
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES 2343
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 9332
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ APR QUITO 0257
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 0434
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL 4225
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
UNCLAS LIMA 001509 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PE
SUBJECT: U.S. VOLUNTEERS TO OAS ELECTION OBSERVATION
MISSION - VIEWS FROM THE FIELD

REF: LIMA 1373

UNCLAS LIMA 001509

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV PE
SUBJECT: U.S. VOLUNTEERS TO OAS ELECTION OBSERVATION
MISSION - VIEWS FROM THE FIELD

REF: LIMA 1373


1. Thirty-eight Embassy officers and family members
volunteered to be observers for the Organization of American
States (OAS) Election Observation Mission on 4/9. The U.S.
volunteers were dispatched to polling sites in ten
departments: Ancash, Arequipa, Cajamarca, Cusco, Ica, La
Libertad, Lambayeque, Lima, Piura, and Tacna. The complete
OAS Mission included 126 observers covering 17 departments.
U.S. volunteer observations concurred with those in the OAS
press releases that on the whole the general elections were
fair and transparent.


2. Some observations from the U.S. volunteers in the field
follow. The general impression of the U.S. observers was
that the elections went smoothly and problems below were
generally isolated incidents.

-- The most common complaints by voters to observers was the
long wait to vote, particularly when voting tables opened
late, and in some cases voters complained of difficulty in
finding the correct polling location and voting table.

-- Though some voting tables opened late, this did not seem
to impede voting significantly. The official time for voting
tables to open was 0800 and most opened within an hour of the
target though some tables were observed to open as late as

1100. The reasons for the delayed starts included the late
arrival of voting table members and necessary time for the
table members to sort through the instructions and material
set-up.

-- Observers reported sporadic incidents of voters who were
not allowed to vote because their name did not appear on the
official voter list. ONPE field officers in at least one
location allowed these citizens to vote by writing in their
name on the printed voter list, while at most sites people
whose name did not appear on the list were not allowed to
vote. (Note: This problem largely arose as a result of
technical reasons such as the recent consolidation of voting
tables and people who applied for national identification
cards or changed their addresses after the December deadline.
End Note.)

-- The recurring complaint observers heard from voting table
members was that the process was too bureaucratic and
required them to sign too many certification forms (e.g., the
president of each table had to sign each ballot and the three
table members each had to sign numerous certification forms.)
(Note: The most common complaint from the voting table
members was the quality of the pre-packaged snacks offered as
sustenance for the table members. End Note.)

-- There was an incident observed in Tacna where the Voting
Table President was urging voters to vote for presidential
candidate Alan Garcia, JNE and ONPE intervened, the behavior
stopped, but no action was taken.

-- Many polling facilities were not conducive to people with
disabilities. However, observers saw ONPE and JNE officials
making efforts to accommodate disabled voters.

-- Some voters who had to travel large distances to vote
complained of transportation cost price gouging. For
example, voters reported that the price of a ticket from Lima
to Piura tripled for election weekend.

-- Many observers recommended that ONPE increase the training
for the field staff and voting table personnel. Though ONPE
and JNE staff on site were capable and dedicated, there was
some inconsistency from one polling site to another on how
they handled voters who were not on the official polling
list. Also, observers reported that some voting table
members were unclear on how to handle improperly completed
ballots.

-- Security was adequate with police at all polling locations
and multiple armed soldiers at most sites. There were
limited reported incidents of violence. The most notable
incident was at Ricardo Palma University when presidential
candidate Ollanta Humala voted and the situation turned tense
with poor security preparation and provoking protesters and

media (Reftel). Another group of observers in central Lima
received reports of an isolated fistfight between voters in
line from different parties and a problem of rocks being
thrown through windows from outside the polling site.

-- Observers were uniformly impressed with the dedication and
attention to task of the citizens conscripted to be voting
table members who worked all day and processed, depending on
the table, between 150 to 250 voters.


3. OAS Mission Ambassador Lloyd Axworthy told Emboffs on 4/11
that the OAS Mission will observe the second round run-off.
However, Post's understanding is that the current OAS Mission
budget was fully allocated to the first round of elections.


4. Comment: The OAS Election Observation Mission was a
success and Post volunteers were actively engaged in the
process. If asked, Post would be happy to provide volunteers
to observe the second round elections. End Comment.
STRUBLE