Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06LAPAZ2732
2006-10-11 21:41:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy La Paz
Cable title:  

BOLIVIAN-VENEZUELAN MILITARY AGREEMENT

Tags:  ECON PGOV PREL BL 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO6343
PP RUEHLMC
DE RUEHLP #2732/01 2842141
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 112141Z OCT 06
FM AMEMBASSY LA PAZ
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0835
INFO RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION 6175
RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA 3489
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 7350
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES 4612
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS 1866
RUEHPE/AMEMBASSY LIMA 1907
RUEHMN/AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO 4076
RUEHQT/AMEMBASSY QUITO 4502
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO 9077
RHMFISS/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RUMIAAA/USCINCSO MIAMI FL
RUEHLMC/MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORP
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 LA PAZ 002732 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/12/2016
TAGS: ECON PGOV PREL BL
SUBJECT: BOLIVIAN-VENEZUELAN MILITARY AGREEMENT

REF: LA PAZ 2726

Classified By: Ambassador Philip S. Goldberg for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d
).

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 LA PAZ 002732

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/12/2016
TAGS: ECON PGOV PREL BL
SUBJECT: BOLIVIAN-VENEZUELAN MILITARY AGREEMENT

REF: LA PAZ 2726

Classified By: Ambassador Philip S. Goldberg for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d
).


1. (C) Summary: The Bolivian senate suspended its October 10
vote on a Bolivian-Venezuelan military agreement signed by
Presidents Morales and Chavez May 26, postponing further
debate to the week of October 16. The agreement provides for
a wide range of military cooperation, including high level
political visits, a joint military working group, "democratic
control of the armed forces," coordination regarding arming
and disarming, information and communication systems,
education and training, as well as "standardization and
interoperational ability" and "other areas of mutual
agreement." Reaction from the opposition, as well as from
Bolivia's neighbors, has been strong. While the agreement
provides further concrete evidence of the growing ties
between Bolivia and Venezuela, the opposition has taken
advantage of the opportunity to secure extensive negative
press regarding Venezuelan meddling in Bolivian internal
affairs. End summary.

--------------
SENATE DEBATE POSTPONED
--------------


2. (C) The Bolivian senate suspended its October 10 vote on
a Bolivian-Venezuelan military agreement signed by Presidents
Morales and Chavez May 26, postponing further debate to the
week of October 16. The agreement is intended to "complement"
the 1973 defense treaty between the two countries. According
to Foreign Minister Choquehuanca, the Bolivian military
provided input for the agreement and approved the final
version. The lower house already approved the treaty; it has
been pending in the senate since September 28. Press reports
indicate that the senate will resume debate after its defense
committee has an opportunity to prepare a report on the
treaty.

--------------
THE TREATY'S SPECIFIC TERMS
--------------


3. (C) The agreement provides for a wide range of military
cooperation. Its goal is to "establish mechanisms of
technical cooperation between the parties to improve and
complement the defense capacity of each country, with the
purpose of contributing to the integrated development of both

peoples." It provides for high level political visits (both
civilian and military authorities); establishment of a joint
military working group; military cooperation regarding both
militaries' legal framework and organization; and cooperation
on crisis management, information and communication systems,
education and training, control of chemical and biochemical
agents, arming and disarming, defense and budgetary plans,
and search and rescue missions (as well as humanitarian
missions). The agreement also refers to cooperation
regarding the "democratic control of the armed forces,"
"standardization and interoperational ability" and "other
areas of mutual agreement." The treaty further provides for
the exchange of information and for construction of a
military "port" in Quijarro (Santa Cruz department) and a
military base in Riberalta (Beni department). Press reports
that the treaty provides for construction of more than twenty
military bases along Bolivia's borders are unfounded; the
agreement only mentions construction of the two military
bases along Bolivia's border with Brazil.

--------------
STRONG OPPOSITION REACTION
--------------


4. (C) Reaction from the opposition, as well as from
Bolivia's neighbors, has been strong. In fact, concerned by
Venezuelan Ambassador Montes' recent declarations that
Venezuelan blood would be shed if the Bolivian revolution

LA PAZ 00002732 002 OF 002


were threatened, even leading MAS deputy Javier Zavaleta,
president of the lower house's defense committee, criticized
Venezuelan interference. The principal opposition party,
Podemos, has described the agreement as "vague" and
"unsettling and risky" for Bolivia's national security.
Podemos' main concern pertains to the "standardization and
interoperational" language, which could be used to justify
the use of Venezuelan troops in an internal Bolivian
conflict. Similarly, Peru, Brazil, Paraguay, Argentina and
Chile have expressed concern regarding the agreement (Chile
initially said the agreement could impact Bolivia's access to
the sea, but President Bachelet later said Bolivia has the
sovereign right to sign defense agreements).

--------------
COMMENT: MORE MEDDLING IN INTERNAL AFFAIRS
--------------


5. (C) While this agreement provides further concrete
evidence of the growing ties between Bolivia and Venezuela,
the opposition has taken advantage of the opportunity to
secure extensive negative press regarding Venezuelan meddling
in Bolivian internal affairs. The treaty, along with the
Venezuelan ambassador's October 7 comments (reftel),are
dragging Venezuelan designs on Bolivia into the open. The
senate's postponement of debate on the treaty is a positive
sign and an opportunity for the opposition to attempt to
limit Venezuelan military influence in Bolivia. We welcome
comments from Santiago, Asuncion, Lima, Buenos Aires and
Brasilia on how their countries are viewing this development.
Press reporting here has alleged significant concern from
neighboring states. End comment.
GOLDBERG