Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06KUALALUMPUR1466
2006-08-04 07:35:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Cable title:  

OIC RELEASES STATEMENTS ON LEBANON AND PALESTINE

Tags:  PGOV PREL NACB IS LE MY 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXYZ0001
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHKL #1466/01 2160735
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 040735Z AUG 06
FM AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7269
INFO RUEHKL/ISLAMIC CONFERENCE COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 0273
RUEHTV/AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV PRIORITY 0134
RUEHJM/AMCONSUL JERUSALEM PRIORITY 0060
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA PRIORITY 0096
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0970
C O N F I D E N T I A L KUALA LUMPUR 001466 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/03/2016
TAGS: PGOV PREL NACB IS LE MY
SUBJECT: OIC RELEASES STATEMENTS ON LEBANON AND PALESTINE

REF: KUALA LUMPUR 1458

Classified By: Political Section Chief Mark D. Clark
for reasons 1.4 (b, d)

C O N F I D E N T I A L KUALA LUMPUR 001466

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/03/2016
TAGS: PGOV PREL NACB IS LE MY
SUBJECT: OIC RELEASES STATEMENTS ON LEBANON AND PALESTINE

REF: KUALA LUMPUR 1458

Classified By: Political Section Chief Mark D. Clark
for reasons 1.4 (b, d)


1. (C) Summary: The Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC)
released two documents concerning Lebanon and Palestine
following their August 3 meeting in Putrajaya, Malaysia
(reftel). While both documents reiterated old rhetoric
condemning Israel and predictably called for an immediate
ceasefire, the conference also adopted Lebanon's Seven Point
Plan en toto, including the call for the Lebanese government
and its "legitimate military" to gain full control over its
territory. Consensus requirements tempered the one-sided
documents, and only Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei agreed to
commit troops to a UN led peacekeeping force. According to
one attendee, internal discussion focused on fears that
public demonstrations would get out of control and that the
conflict was sowing the seeds of more terrorism. Although
Malaysia joined the loud and over the top rhetoric against
Israel, it also distanced itself and the OIC from
Ahmadinejad's statements calling for Israel's destruction,
while the OIC's Palestine statement reaffirmed support for a
permanent two-state solution. The OIC's endorsement of the
seven-point plan, particularly support for extending Lebanese
government authority over its own land, may open
opportunities for some common ground with Muslim leaders.
End Summary.

Mere statements of condemnation
--------------


2. (C) At the conclusion of the August 3 Meeting of the
Friends of the Chair of the 10th Islamic Summit Conference
(reftel),the OIC released two consensus documents: the
Putrajaya Declaration on the Situation in Lebanon; and the
Putrajaya Declaration on the Situation in the Occupied
Palestinian Territories. Contrary to Malaysian Prime Minister
Abdullah Badawi's calls to stop "issuing mere statements of
condemnation for the violence" the meeting and declarations
did little more.

Declaration on Lebanon
--------------


3. (C) The declaration on Lebanon repeated previous calls for
an immediate ceasefire in Lebanon; unequivocally condemned

Israel as the aggressor; did not mention Hizbollah; largely
avoided Abdullah's opening rhetoric of a Middle East plot;
and wholly endorsed Lebanon's Seven Point Plan rather than
produce new recommendations for creating peace. Again, the
declaration fell far short of Abdullah's call for new
commitments and action in his opening speech to the Meeting
of Friends. There was no general call for OIC members to
contribute troops to a peacekeeping mission and there were no
specific pledges of assistance. The adoption of the Lebanese
Seven Point Plan was the most balanced statement of the
conference and called for the Lebanese government to extend
its authority over its territory through its own legitimate
armed forces. An insider on Malaysian Foreign Minister Hamid
Albar's personal staff admitted to us that the conferees were
not able to come to a consensus on stronger language in the
declaration on Lebanon, nor on a pledge to send peacekeeping
troops to the region, noting as the press did, that only
Brunei and Indonesia were willing to join Malaysia in
committing peacekeepers. He characterized Abdullah's opening
remarks as strong but the final declarations "were much
weaker."

A few words on Palestine
--------------


4. (C) Similarly, the declaration on the situation in the
occupied Palestinian territories provided little more than a
restatement of previous positions. Predictably, the members
condemned Israel for its occupation and called for a complete
and unconditional withdrawal from Gaza and the West Bank,
including East Jerusalem. They called for the world to
accept the outcome of the recent Palestinian elections, and
endorsed the two-state solution and roadmap for peace. The
declaration on Palestine was only half the length of the one
on Lebanon, as Palestine apparently played less on the minds
of those in attendance. There were no new ideas or courses
of action regarding Palestine, and none of the countries in
attendance made any new pledges of assistance.

Action and reaction
--------------


5. (C) Following the Meeting of Friends, Abdullah held
bilateral talks with leaders from Iran, Turkey, Bangladesh
and Pakistan. Following these encounters, Abdullah advised
the press that he would send a personal letter to President
Bush to urge him to use his influence to bring an immediate
ceasefire. In addition, he would explain the position of the
OIC and Malaysia on the crisis in Lebanon. Malaysia's
Foreign Minister Syed Hamid Albar also made a series of media
appearances to explain the results of the Meeting of Friends.
Hamid made a point to distance the OIC from Iranian president
Ahmadinejad's calls for the destruction of Israel, deeming
those remarks Ahmadinejad's own views and not the position of
the OIC. Local newspapers all carried a summary of the
conference declarations on the front page, and most papers
headlined feature photos of Abdullah and Ahmadinejad shaking
hands. One daily repeated a New York Times editorial that
called into question Iran's actions and motives related to
Lebanon.


Leaders concerned over the Muslim street
--------------


6. (C) An Embassy contact at the Pakistani High Commission
who attended the conference advised us that "all the leaders
were really concerned about public agitation (connected with
events in Lebanon) in their home countries." Many commented
that "It's getting difficult to control the streets."
Indonesian President Yudhoyono reportedly made especially
strong statements in condemnation of Israel and referenced
the large demonstrations hitting the streets in response to
Israel's actions in Lebanon. Our contact further commented
that nearly all the countries were concerned that "Israel is
trying to expand the conflict beyond Lebanon to other
countries in the region." It was further mentioned that other
OIC members discussed sending peacekeepers to southern
Lebanon, but only under the auspices of the United Nations,
and "only if Hizbollah agrees." Conferees expressed fear
that the latest conflict was actually "sowing the seeds of
more terrorism."

Comment
--------------


7. (C) The OIC's statement on Lebanon was obviously and
disappointingly one-sided in tone and condemnation of Israel.
However, the seven-point plan, particularly its call for
Lebanese government to extend its authority over its own
territory, does not appear to be so far from what we are
working to achieve. The OIC's endorsement of the plan may
open opportunities for some common ground with Muslim leaders.
LAFLEUR