Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06KATHMANDU271
2006-01-27 12:23:00
CONFIDENTIAL
Embassy Kathmandu
Cable title:  

AMBASSADOR DISCUSSES NEPAL WITH CONCERNED JAPANESE

Tags:  PREL PGOV NP JA 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO4336
OO RUEHCN
DE RUEHKT #0271/01 0271223
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 271223Z JAN 06
FM AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0076
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 3867
RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO PRIORITY 4113
RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA PRIORITY 9176
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD PRIORITY 2095
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 3534
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 9109
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 0699
RUEHCN/AMCONSUL CHENGDU PRIORITY 0270
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 1066
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KATHMANDU 000271 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR SA/INS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/27/2016
TAGS: PREL PGOV NP JA
SUBJECT: AMBASSADOR DISCUSSES NEPAL WITH CONCERNED JAPANESE
COUNTERPART

REF: KATHMANDU 200

Classified By: Ambassador James F. Moriarty. Reasons 1.4 (b/d).

Summary
-------

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KATHMANDU 000271

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

DEPT FOR SA/INS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 01/27/2016
TAGS: PREL PGOV NP JA
SUBJECT: AMBASSADOR DISCUSSES NEPAL WITH CONCERNED JAPANESE
COUNTERPART

REF: KATHMANDU 200

Classified By: Ambassador James F. Moriarty. Reasons 1.4 (b/d).

Summary
--------------


1. (C) On January 26, Japanese Ambassador Hiraoka told the
Ambassador he was concerned about the deteriorating situation
in Nepal. He noted that 2006 was the 50th anniversary of
establishing diplomatic relations with Nepal, and although
Japan had not planned any major celebration, the Japanese
Foreign Ministry Southwest Asia Director would visit Nepal in
early February. Hiraoka appeared interested in Chinese
influence in Nepal, pointing out that the Chinese Foreign
Ministry had issued a statement saying China "hopes the
situation in Nepal can stabilize as soon as possible and all
parties in Nepal can narrow their differences through
dialogue and commit themselves to national development and
prosperity." End Summary.

Fifty-years of Diplomatic Relations in 2006
--------------


2. (C) On January 26, Japanese Ambassador Hiraoka told the
Ambassador that though 2006 was the golden jubilee of Japan's
establishing diplomatic relations with Nepal, the
celebrations would be muted due to the deteriorating
situation in Nepal. He noted it was unlikely that the
Nepalese King would visit Japan or that any members of the
Japanese royal family would visit Nepal. However, Hiraoka
informed the Ambassador that the Japanese Foreign Ministry
Southwest Asia Director would visit Nepal in early February.

Japan Worried About Chinese Influence in Nepal
-------------- -


3. (C) Hiraoka explained he was concerned about the
deteriorating situation in Nepal, saying he saw "no progress"
since February 1, 2005. Hiraoka noted that Beijing had even
uncharacteristically issued a statement on January 24.
(Note: The Chinese Foreign Ministry website quoted the
spokesman as saying "Nepal is a friendly neighbor of China.
Recently there have been some changes in Nepal's political
situation, which we certainly follow. Essentially speaking,
it is Nepal's internal affair. As a friendly neighbor of
Nepal, China hopes the situation in Nepal can stabilize as
soon as possible and all parties in Nepal can narrow their
differences thorough dialogue and commit themselves to
national development and prosperity." China had refrained
from commenting on political developments in Nepal since
February 1, when it had only referred to the royal takeover
as an "internal" matter of Nepal. Equally uncharacteristic,
Japan has been forward leaning in Nepal over the past few
weeks and was the first country to issue a statement
criticizing the arrest of political party activists on
January 19 and 20 (reftel). End note.)


4. (C) Apparently interested about Chinese influence in
Nepal, Hiraoka asserted that China was concerned about
"Taiwan, Tibet and economic development." He noted that the
Director would bring up the issue of Tibetan refugees in
Nepal. (Note: A Japanese emboff planned to visit the
Tibetan Reception Center for the first time on January 27 to
gather information. End note.) Hiraoka highlighted the
large numbers of Nepali government and military officials who
visited China in 2005, apparently at the Chinese government's
expense. The Ambassador noted that some of these visits
could have been in conjunction with the celebration of fifty
years of diplomatic relations between China and Nepal.
Hiraoka mentioned a rumor that the King had planned to visit
China in December 2005, but had apparently decided against
the visit, perhaps because of Indian opposition. Hiraoka
reported that the Indian Ambassador had assured him that
India would continue economic cooperation with Nepal and

KATHMANDU 00000271 002 OF 002


would not close the border with Nepal as it had in 1989.

Future Steps
--------------


5. (C) Hiraoka wondered when the government would release all
political prisoners, expressing specific concern over second
tier political leaders in detention. He also noted that the
political parties had removed "constitutional monarchy" from
their party manifestos. He added that the political parties
appeared unpopular among ordinary Nepalis and opined that the
12-point understanding meant to pressure the King had
backfired for the Parties. He worried about the Maoists'
call for a Nepal strike around the planned municipal election
and explained that Japan was looking at its travel advisory
for Nepal in light of the changing security situation.

Comment
--------------


6. (C) As the largest donor, and one which generally remains
neutral about the political situation, Japan is respected in
Nepal. We should stay in close touch with Japan on Nepal;
the Japanese have clout here and appear increasingly willing
to speak out.
MORIARTY