Identifier
Created
Classification
Origin
06JOHANNESBURG202
2006-06-08 12:47:00
UNCLASSIFIED
Consulate Johannesburg
Cable title:  

SOUTH AFRICA: ROLE OF NEDLAC

Tags:  ELAB ECON SF 
pdf how-to read a cable
VZCZCXRO2106
RR RUEHDU RUEHHM RUEHMR
DE RUEHJO #0202/01 1591247
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 081247Z JUN 06
FM AMCONSUL JOHANNESBURG
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5092
INFO RUEHXI/LABOR COLLECTIVE
RUCNSAD/SADC COLLECTIVE
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHINGTON DC
RUEHJO/AMCONSUL JOHANNESBURG 1726
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 JOHANNESBURG 000202 

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ELAB ECON SF
SUBJECT: SOUTH AFRICA: ROLE OF NEDLAC


JOHANNESBU 00000202 001.2 OF 003


UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 JOHANNESBURG 000202

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: ELAB ECON SF
SUBJECT: SOUTH AFRICA: ROLE OF NEDLAC


JOHANNESBU 00000202 001.2 OF 003



1. Summary: The National Economic Development and Labor
Council (NEDLAC) celebrated its tenth anniversary last year,
amid some questions about its utility in creating social
consensus on government policy. NEDLAC, established in 1995, is
a forum designed to promote social dialogue and brings together
government, business, labor and civil society to reach consensus
on labor legislation and significant social and economic
legislation through negotiation. The three social partners
(government, business, and organized labor) are represented in
equal numbers in all NEDLAC's chambers and the Executive
Council, while civil society is represented by NGOs, CBO's and
other stakeholders. NEDLAC has achieved a working compromise
with Parliament, but has been unable to buy labor peace through
its functioning. Despite this inability, Labor Minister
Mdladlana said on May 17 that the South African example of
social dialogue exemplified by NEDLAC was the "envy of the
world." End Summary.

Background


2. NEDLAC's origins lie in the struggle against apartheid,
against unilateral government decision making, and in the calls
from civil society for government decisions to be taken in a
more inclusive and transparent manner. While many governments
have a tripartite (government, business and labor) consultative
structure, NEDLAC, according to its Chief Executive, Herbert
Mkhize, is the only four-part organization in existence, since
it includes civil society in addition to the more usual grouping
of government, business and labor. Under the act creating
NEDLAC, the organization was given the mandate to review all
labor legislation and all significant changes to social and
economic policy before being implemented or introduced in
parliament. (Mkhize, however, noted that the government set
the broad macroeconomic agenda, and that this was not/not
subject to debate.)


3. NEDLAC's broader mandate as defined by the Act is to:
-- strive to promote the goals of economic growth,
participation in economic decision-making and social equity;
-- seek to reach consensus and conclude agreements pertaining
to economic and social policy;
-- consider all proposed labor legislation relating to labor
market policy before it is introduced in Parliament;

-- consider all significant changes to social and economic
policy before it is implemented or introduced to parliament, and
-- encourage and promote the formulation of coordinated policy
on social and economic matters.

Structure and Funding


4. The Act also makes provision for three constitutional
structures: the Executive Council, the Management Committee,
and the Four Chambers (the Labor Market Chamber, the Trade and
Industry chamber, the Public Finance and Monetary Policy
Chamber, and the Development Chamber). The four chambers report
to the Executive Council, in which agreements are concluded,
before being sent on to Parliament.


5. NEDLAC's core activities are funded from the Department of
Labor budget, and the Minister of Labor is the chief of the
government delegation. Mkhize said that NEDLAC obtains
additional funding from other sources for specific projects.
NEDLAC's budget was approximately R9 million in 2004/5. Mkhize
stressed that NEDLAC was set up as a non-profit organization and
the government had "zero control" on how its funding could be
used. Funds were often made available to provide expertise and
build capacity for one party or other: labor, for example,
might request the services of a consultant to help in analyze a
proposal by business.


6. Agreements which were hammered out in NEDLAC include the
Labor Relations Act of 1995, the Basic Conditions of Employment
Act of 1996, and the Mine Safety Act of 1996.

Representation


7. The government delegation is comprised of ministers, deputy
ministers, and director-generals from several ministries and
departments, including labor, finance, trade and industry,
public works, mineral and energy affairs, with the Minister of
Labor as the chief representative of government. Labor is
represented by three federations, the Congress of South African
Trade Unions (COSATU),the Federation of South African Labor
Union (FEDUSA),and National Council of Trade Unions (NACTU).
Business Unity South Africa (BUSA) was created by legislation to
represent business interests and its membership is drawn from
various industry and professional associations, chambers of
commerce and employers' organizations. The governor of the
Reserve Bank is an ex-officio member of the Chamber on Public
Finance and Monetary Policy, and one session a year is devoted
to monetary policy.

JOHANNESBU 00000202 002.2 OF 003



Role of Civil Society


8. According to Mkhize, NEDLAC is unique in that it offers a
place at the table to civil society. Although government
claims that by virtue of being democratically elected, it
represents broader society, NEDLAC also makes space for
community-based and non-governmental organizations. Their
representatives sit on the basis of mandates, which are
sometimes hard to formulate among competing interests. Mkhize
noted that although the presence of civil society added to the
"sense of accountability", the difficulty of formulating and
revising mandates lead to coalitions, which in turn required
"leadership from the front" in order to push items through.

How NEDLAC Works in Practice


9. Government departments are supposed to bring draft
legislation to be negotiated in NEDLAC. The first draft, a
"green paper" outlines the relevant ministry's conceptual
approach and is discussed the appropriate chamber. A second
draft or "white paper" then incorporates the sometimes
conflicting suggestions of various participants. However any
of the four constituencies (or subgroups thereof) can table
issues for discussion. After draft legislation has been
discussed in the Chambers, it moves forward in sections: 1)
areas of agreement; 2) areas of disagreement; and 3) areas for
further discussion.


10. Mkhize noted that times when issues arise are either when a
government department first tables its proposal cabinet, before
going to NEDLAC or when the policy but not the legislation is
brought to NEDLAC. In the first instance, the government
department generally has a very tight mandate to make changes --
but NEDLAC's constituencies generally dislike "faits accomplis"
giving rise to tension with in the organization and leading to
delays in Parliament. In the second instance, the details of
the legislation may not correspond to the understanding of the
policy as developed by one or more of the constituencies. This
can also arise when policy issues are put into legal language
needed for draft legislation, and nuances in the negotiation are
not understood by the legal drafters.


11. Mkhize said that the secretariat role was that of project
management. The secretariat had to fuse government timelines
with the project plan. Mkhize noted that "leadership from the
front" was sometimes needed to reconcile a variety of
viewpoints. He said that often the secretariat would receive
four distinct inputs on a subject with no semblance of
convergence which they needed to synthesize and consolidate.

Interaction with Parliament


12. In theory, the various constituencies have several means of
continuing to influence the legislative process after draft
legislation has been debated in NEDLAC. Issues can be raised
within the Portfolio Committee and also in the National Chamber.
Areas of draft legislation in which NEDLAC has reached
agreement cannot however be reopened. Mkhize said that he often
attended parliamentary sessions to ensure that this agreement
was respected by the constituencies and the portfolio committee
chairs supported him in this.

Labor Law Reform


13. Mkhize said that so far six papers had been commissioned on
labor law reform, from a variety of sources. He said that
NEDLAC had received "mixed messages" on the reforms needed.
Four of the six papers said that no reforms were needed with the
law but only with its implementation. According to Mkhize, the
IMF representative, when asked directly what changes he would
recommend, only noted that it was hard to dismiss workers.
Mkhize also noted that labor was "not interested in reversing
hard-fought gains."

Future of NEDLAC


14. Mkhize noted that some critics said the institution had
outlived its usefulness since all of the policies were now in
place and implementation was the issue of the day. He noted
however that NEDLAC was the object of substantial interest from
other countries, and thought it structure could be exported to
other African countries. Rwanda had sent a team to study
NEDLAC, as both Kenya and Tanzania, as well as French-speaking
Africa were interested. The IMF had also expressed interest in
using NEDLAC as a model to create a common vision and support
for reform. (Labor Minister Mdladlana, in his May 17 budget
speech (septel),noted that NEDLAC was the "envy of the world."
)


15. Within South Africa, Mkhize argued that the next step for

JOHANNESBU 00000202 003.2 OF 003


NEDLAC would be to establish social dialogue at the provincial
and local level. He noted that labor in particular was
uncomfortable with this proposal, partly because of a fear that
local leaders might not be sufficiently articulate to best
represent them and partly because they resisted federalism.


Comment


16. NEDLAC comes in for a fair share of criticism since it
inevitably brakes the government's process of moving from
establishing a policy to implementing legislation, while
parliamentary groups see it as usurping their role. It also
exposes the government to criticism when departments don't send
representatives at the policy-making level. Nevertheless, it
functions as a forum where stakeholders can make their points
and where business and labor can unite to pressure government if
need be, without the involvement of pricy lobbyists. End
Comment.
COFFMAN